Skip to main content

Practical Tips to Facilitate CO:PO Mapping and Documentation

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Constructive alignment is an approach commonly used to align teaching and learning activities to the stipulated course outcome(s) (COs). Nevertheless, many lecturers find it a daunting task to establish the linking between COs and programme outcome(s) (POs), for each lesson and assessment. In order to facilitate the proper alignment of teaching and learning activities to its respective COs and POs, firstly preset all the CO:PO mapping (based on approved CO:PO matrix) in the course outline as well as lesson plan and update them accordingly. Secondly, request all lecturers to assign the assessments and examination questions with the correct COs:POs. Lecturers involved in the course need to understand well the course content and its CO:PO measurements. Thirdly, for each type of assessment, allocate a table with predetermined COs:POs and scoring marks. Lecturers will then have to fill in the marks in the predesigned table format, which will facilitate the analysis of CO:PO measurements. Then an Excel spreadsheet with proper allocation of COs:POs need to be constructed to capture all assessment marks scored by students. The scores for each CO and PO can then be converted into an average percentage score. Finally, with the average percentage score of COs and POs, the lecturer can proceed with continuous quality improvement (CQI) where a comparison of scores from previous semester(s) can be made. This is to identify any potential drawbacks from the teaching and learning activities, where alternative solutions can be figured out to improve the delivery of the course. With the aforementioned steps, we have found that we were able to systematically measure and analyse COs:POs. The Excel spreadsheet not only serves as a crosscheck tool whilst filling but also allow us to continuously monitor and improve the quality of our course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (2003). Outcome-based education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 30(3), 258–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R. M., Crosby, J. R., & Davis, M. H. (1999a). AMEE Guide No.14: Outcome-based education: Part 1-An introduction to outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R. M., Crosby, J. R., Davis, M. H., & Friedman, M. (1999b). AMEE Guide No.14: Outcome-based education: Part 5-From competency to meta-competency: A model for the specification of learning outcomes. Medical Teacher, 21(6), 546–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (2005). Best practice in outcome teaching and learning at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Center for learning Enhancement and Research, Carmel McNaught.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S. (2012). Outcome-based curriculum development and student evaluation in nursing education. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 42(7), 917–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roziah, et al. (2012). Edisi 2 Garis Panduan Kesetaraan Kualiti Penilaian Pelajar UiTM. Unit Hal Ehwal Kurikulum (UHEK) UiTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spady, W. G. (1993). Outcome-based education. ACSA report no 5. Belconnen: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuet Yen Wong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wong, Y.Y., Mei, Y.S., Muhammad, A.M., Neoh, C.F., Ming, L.C. (2015). Practical Tips to Facilitate CO:PO Mapping and Documentation. In: Tang, S., Logonnathan, L. (eds) Taylor’s 7th Teaching and Learning Conference 2014 Proceedings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-399-6_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics