Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of Hong Kong’s political system and the development of the city’s civil society. How did Hong Kong become China’s democratic enclave? Why would the notoriously draconian Chinese authoritarian state permit the city to keep a relatively liberal political and media environment? How did the Chinese authoritarian state design the political institutions of Hong Kong in order to defend its political interests? These questions are addressed based on an analysis of the formal political institutions of postcolonial Hong Kong and the city’s political developments in the 1980s and 1990s.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Before Deng took the helm, Beijing had declined Portugal’s requests to return Macao in 1967 and 1974. Mao Zedong also indicated to a former British Prime Minister in 1975 that the time for resolving the Hong Kong issue was not ripe (Vogel 2011, p. 488).
- 2.
In 1985, Hong Kong’s investment in China accounted for 49 % of the country’s total FDI (State Statistical Bureau, the People’s Republic of China 1987, p. 221).
- 3.
The goal of Four Modernizations was to promote the country’s agriculture, industry, science and technology, and national defense.
- 4.
After the CCP took over China, it decided to adopt a pragmatic policy, known as “long-term planning and full utilization” (changqi dasuan, chongfen liyong),” to deal with Hong Kong (Yep 2009, p. 86). This is because the CCP saw Hong Kong as a British colony had certain strategic value to Beijing. For instance, during the Korean War, when the PRC faced Western trade embargoes, Hong Kong served as an important back door for Beijing to acquire foreign resources (Carroll 2007, p. 142).
- 5.
The British government was reluctant to return Hong Kong to the PRC. Margaret Thatcher once made a proposal that separated sovereignty from administration: while the mainland resumed Hong Kong’s sovereignty, Great Britain would continue to keep the city’s administration. Deng firmly rejected her proposal.
- 6.
The “one country, two systems” principle was originally designed for the reunification with Taiwan.
- 7.
What would happen after 50 years? Deng suggested that there was no need to worry, as the two systems would gradually converge after 50 years (Deng 2004, pp. 18, 38, and 64).
- 8.
Right of abode in Hong Kong has continued to be a contentious issue since the handover, as a number of court cases challenged the constitutionality of the government’s immigration policies.
- 9.
The membership size has expanded twice, from 400 to 800 and then from 800 to 1,200.
- 10.
The figure comes from the HKSAR Electoral Affairs Commission . http://www.elections.gov.hk/legco2012/chi/facts.html. Accessed May 26, 2014.
- 11.
The 2010 political reform produced five new functional constituencies representing the District Councils . Unlike the remaining 30 seats for functional constituencies, these 5 seats have an electorate that encompasses about 93 % of the total voting-age population.
- 12.
Prior to the retrocession, Beijing and the British government had a heated discussion about the scope and franchise of functional constituencies. See, for example, Lo (1994).
- 13.
- 14.
For a detailed discussion of the composition of the Hong Kong deputies to the NPC, see Young and Cullen (2010).
- 15.
The NPCSC ruled that people born outside Hong Kong do not have the right of abode unless their parents had already become Hong Kong permanent residents at the time of their birth. This interpretation drastically reduced the number of potential right of abode holders.
- 16.
See “The Interpretation by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of Article 7 of Annex I and Article III of Annex II to the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China,” adopted at the eighth session of the Standing Committee of the tenth National People’s Congress on April 6, 2004.
- 17.
The population of Hong Kong in 1971 was 3.94 million (Census and Statistics Department of Hong Kong 2012).
- 18.
A prevailing view at that time was that “Great Britain is not reliable and the Chinese Communist is not trustworthy” (yingguo bu kekao, zhonggong bu kexin) (Lam 1984, p. 461).
- 19.
There exist other explanations for the colonial government’s unlikely political liberalization since the mid-1980s. Some argue that the British government believed the CCP would fall soon after the June 4 Incident (Lu 2009, p. 70). Others point out that Patten had an incentive to present himself as a freedom fighter for Hong Kong, which would bring him considerable political credential back home after 1997 (Lo 1994, p. 194).
- 20.
Most of the elected opposition legislators gained their office popularly elected through geographical constituencies .
- 21.
- 22.
The largest one took place immediately after Beijing’s brutal crackdown on the student-led prodemocracy movement in 1989.
- 23.
Siu-kai Lau, head of the HKSAR’s official think tank, gave that conservative estimate.
- 24.
For instance, the “Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Issues Relating to the Methods for Selecting the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in the Year 2007 and for Forming the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in the Year 2008” states: “[S]ince the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong residents have enjoyed democratic rights that they have never had before.”
Bibliography
Carroll, J. M. (2007). A concise history of Hong Kong. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Census and Statistics Department of Hong Kong. (2012). Hong Kong monthly digest of statistics, 4 2012.
Cha, L. Y. (1984). On Hong Kong’s future. Hong Kong: Ming Pao Daily News.
Chan, J. M.-M., Fu, H., & Ghai, Y. (2000). Hong Kong’s constitutional debate: Conflict over interpretation (Vol. 1). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Cheng, J. Y.-S. (1984). Hong Kong: In search of a future. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Cheung, A. B. L. (2000). New interventionism in the making: Interpreting state interventions in Hong Kong after the change of sovereignty. Journal of Contemporary China, 9(24), 291–308.
Cho, Y. N. (2010). Local people’s congresses in China: Development and transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DeGolyer, M. E. (2004). How the stunning outbreak of disease led to a stunning outbreak of dissent. In C. Loh (Ed.), At the epicentre: Hong Kong and the SARS outbreak. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
DeGolyer, M. E., & Scott, J. L. (1996). The myth of political apathy in Hong Kong. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 547, 68–78.
Deng, X. (2004). Deng Xiaoping lun ‘Yiguo Liangzhi’ [Deng Xiaoping Discusses ‘One Country Two Systems’]. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing.
Feng, B. Y. (1997). Xianggang Huazi Caituan: 1841–1997 [Hong Kong Chinese Conglomerates]. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing.
Fong, P. K. W., & Yeh, A. G. O. (1987). Hong Kong. In Ha, K.-S. (Ed.), Housing policy and practice in Asia. New York: Croom Helm.
Gehlbach, S., & Keefer, P. (2011). Investment without democracy: Ruling-party institutionalization and credible commitment in autocracies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(2), 123–139.
Ghai, Y. P. (1999). Hong Kong’s new constitutional order: The resumption of Chinese sovereignty and the Basic Law. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Goodstadt, L. F. (2005). Uneasy partners: The conflict between public interest and private profit in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2008). The federalist papers. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hong Kong Economic Journal. (2012). Tsang Yok-sing: Central Government Has Reservations about Party Politics [Tsang Yok-sing chang: zhongyang dui zhengdang zhengzhi rengyou baoliu], 29 Feb 2012.
Hughes, R. (1968). Hong Kong: Borrowed place, borrowed time. London: Deutsch.
Kamo, T., & Takeuchi, H. (2013). Representation and local people’s congresses in China: A case study of the yangzhou municipal people’s congress. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 18(1), 41–60.
King, A. Y.-C. (1975). Administrative absorption of politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the grass roots level. Asian Survey, 15(5), 422–439.
Kuan, C.-H., Lau, K.-S., Louie, S.-K., & Wong, Y.-K. (Eds.). (1999). Power transfer and electoral politics: The first legislative election in the Hong Kong special administrative region. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Lam, C.-H. (1984). Thoughts and facts about the problems of Hong Kong’s future. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Economic Journal.
Lam, C.-H. (1989). Emigrants left with money drains funds for infrastructure, 28 Nov 1989.
Lam, M.-W. (2004). Understanding the political culture of Hong Kong: The paradox of activism and depoliticization. Armonk: ME Sharpe.
Lau, K.-S. (1981). The government, intermediate organizations, and grass-roots politics in Hong Kong. Asian Survey, 21(8), 865–884.
Lau, K.-S. (1984). Society and politics in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Lau, K.-S., & Kuan, H.-C. (1988). The ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Lee, E. W. Y. (1999). Governing post-colonial Hong Kong: Institutional incongruity, governance crisis, and authoritarianism. Asian Survey, 39(6), 940–959.
Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2011). Media, social mobilisation and mass protests in post-colonial Hong Kong: The power of a critical event. New York: Routledge.
Leung, S.-W. (1991). The “China factor” in the 1991 legislative council election: The june 4th incident and anti-Communist China syndrome. In S.-K. Lau & H.-C. Kuan (Eds.), The Hong Kong tried democracy: The 1991 elections in Hong Kong (pp. 187–235). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.
Leung, S.-W. (1996). The “China factor” and voters’ choice in the 1995 legislative council election. In H.-C. Kuan, et al. (Eds.), The 1995 legislative council elections in Hong Kong (pp. 201–44). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.
Levi, M. (1989). Of rule and revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lieberthal, K. (1992). The future of Hong Kong. Asian Survey, 32(7), 666–682.
Lo, S.-H. (1994). An analysis of Sino-British negotiations over Hong Kong’s political reform. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 16(2), 178–209.
Lu, P. (2009). Lu Ping’s oral history of Hong Kong’s reunification [Lu Ping Koushu Xianggang Huigui]. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing.
Lui, T.-L., Kuan, H.-C., Chan, K.-M., & Chan, S. C.-W. (2005). Friends and critics of the state: The case of Hong Kong. In R. P. Weller (Ed.), Civil life, globalization, and political change in Asia (pp. 58–75). London/New York: Routledge.
Ma, N. (2005). Civil society in self-defense: The struggle against national security legislation in Hong Kong. Journal of Contemporary China, 14(44), 465–482.
Ma, N. (2012). An oral history of democratic movement of Hong Kong in the 1980s [Xianggang 80 niandai minzhu yundong koushu lishi]. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
Ma, N., & Choy, I. (1999). The evolution of the electoral system and party politics in Hong Kong. Issues & Studies, 35(1), 167–194.
Ma, N., & Choy, I. (2003). Political consequences of electoral systems: The Hong Kong proportional representation system. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
Magaloni, B. (2008). Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4/5), 715.
Manion, M. (2008). When Communist party candidates can lose, who wins? Assessing the role of local people’s congresses in the selection of leaders in China. The China Quarterly, 195, 607–630.
Manion, M. (2014). “good types” in authoritarian elections the selectoral connection in Chinese local congresses. Comparative Political Studies, 0010414014537027.
Mathews, G., Ma, E., & Lui, T.-L. (2007). Hong Kong, China: Learning to belong to a nation (Vol. 10). London: Routledge.
Miners, N. (1995). The government and politics of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Ngo, T.-W. (2002). Industrial history and the artifice of laissez-faire colonialism. In T.-W. Ngo (Ed.), Hong Kong’s history: State and society under colonial rule. London/New York: Routledge.
Olson, M. (2008). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Petersen, C. J. (2005). Hong Kong’s spring of discontent: The rise and fall of the national security bill in 2003. In H. Fu, C. J. Petersen, & S. N. M. Young (Eds.), National security and fundamental freedoms: Hong Kong’s article 23 under scrutiny. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Qian, Q. (2004). Ten diplomatic anecdotes [waijiao shiji]. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing.
Qiang, S. (2008). Zhongguo Xianggang: Wenhua yu Zhengzhi Shiye [Chinese Hong Kong: Cultural and Political Perspectives]. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Schiffer, J. R. (1991). State policy and economic growth: A note on the Hong Kong model. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 15(2), 180–196.
Scott, I. (1989). Political change and the crisis of legitimacy in Hong Kong. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Scott, I. (2000). The disarticulation of Hong Kong’s post-handover political system. The China Journal, 43, 29–53.
Sing, M. (2004). Hong Kong’s tortuous democratization: A comparative analysis (Vol. 2). London/New York:RoutledgeCurzon.
So, A. Y. (2011). “One country, two systems” and Hong Kong-China national integration: A crisis-transformation perspective. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(1), 99–116.
State Statistical Bureau, the People’s Republic of China. (1987). China- trade and price statistics in 1987.
Ta Kung Pao. (2013). Tsang Yok-sing suggests chief executive should have party background [Tsang Yok-sing chang teshou ju zhengdang Beijing], 29 May 2013.
Tsang, S. Y.-S. (2001). Judicial independence and the rule of law in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Vogel, E. F. (2011). Deng Xiaoping and the transformation of China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Washington Post. (2000). Discontent Afflicts Hong Kong; Protest Epidemic Reflects Rising Anxiety of Midle Class, 28 June 2000.
Weng, B. (1998). The first year of the HKSAR: Changes in the political institutions. CSIS Hong Kong Update, 1–4.
Xia, M. (2007). The People’s congresses and governance in China: Toward a network mode of governance. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Xiao, Y. (1990). “One country, two systems” and Hong Kong basic legal system [Yiguo liangzhi yu xianggang jiben falu zhidu]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Xu, J. (1993). Xu jiatun xianggang huiyilu [xu jiatun’s Hong Kong memoir]. United Daily News.
Xu, J. (1998). Memoirs and thoughts of Xu Jiatun. New York: Mirror Books Limited.
Yep, R. (2009). ‘One country, two systems’ and special administrative regions: The case of Hong Kong. In J. H. Chung & T.-C. Lam (Eds.), China’s local administration: Traditions and changes in the sub-national hierarchy (pp. 86–110). London/New York: Routledge.
Young, S. N. M., & Cullen, R. (2010). Electing Hong Kong’s chief executive. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Young, S. N. M., Law, A., & Exchange, C. (2004). A Critical Introduction to Hong Kong’s Functional Constituencies. Hong Kong: Civic Exchange.
Youngson, A. J. (1982). Hong Kong, economic growth and policy. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wong, S.HW. (2015). Birds in a Cage: Political Institutions and Civil Society in Hong Kong. In: Electoral Politics in Post-1997 Hong Kong. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-387-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-387-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-386-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-387-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)