Skip to main content

Simulation Study of the Effect of Smart Water on Relative Permeability During WAG-CO2 Injection for Light Oil Reservoir

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICIPEG 2014

Abstract

Water alternating gas (WAG) injection with its first successful field pilot application on the North Pembina field in Alberta, Canada, in 1957, is one of the most prominent EOR methods that substantially prolong the lives of the otherwise depleted and uneconomical oil fields. This technique is well established, but the practical challenges are often of the occurrence of viscous fingering, gravity segregation, and gas channeling or override, and consequently lower oil recovery rates. Previous researches have focused almost exclusively on modifying the salinity and the ionic composition of the injected water, also termed as smart waterflooding which proved to further enhance the oil recovery obtained from waterflooding. However, obscurity exists on whether the deployment of smart water during WAG-CO2 injection will be successful. This paper addresses the impacts of the implementation of a technique which combines smart waterflooding and WAG-CO2 injection on the oil/water relative permeability curves for a light oil reservoir. An analysis on the two-phase relative permeability functions is essential as to predict the effectiveness of the displacement process or the performance of smart water injection applied during WAG-CO2 injection. CMG STARS was used to simulate the effects of fine-tuning the salinity as well as varying the composition of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions in brine on the oil recovery factor. The optimum brine salinity for maximum oil recovery was also determined. The slight shifting of the relative permeability curves to the right which can be observed proves the capability of the smart water to modify the rock wettability toward a more water-wet system. Yet the findings from the simulation study suggest that the use of smart waterflooding is not ideal or has low potential in increasing the oil recovery during WAG-CO2 injection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmed, T. 2001. Principles OfWaterflooding. In Reservoir Engineering Handbook, second edition. Houston,Texas: Gulf Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amyx, J. W., Bass, D. M. and Whiting, R. L. 1960. Petroleum reservoir engineering: physical properties, 174-209. New York City: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, W. G. 1987. Wettability literature survey part 5: The effects of wettability on relative permeability. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 39(11), 1453-1468.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Awolola, K. A. 2012. Enhanced Oil Recovery For Norne Field (Statoil) C-Segment Using Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Flooding. PhD diss., Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, Y. B., Coats, B., and Nolen, J. 1998. A compositional model for CO2 floods including CO2 solubility in water. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1(2), 155-160.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, J. R., Stenby, E. H., and Skauge, A. 2001. Review of WAG field experience. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 4 (2), 97-106.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gorell, S. B. 1990. Implications of water-alternate-gas injection, for profile control and injectivity. In SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hasanov, B. 2010. Application of low salinity water injection to NORNE field E-segment.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Honarpour, M.M. and Maloney, D.R. 1990. Relative Permeability Technology And Applications. Paper NIPER 9008 presented at the 4th Annual SCA Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jadhunandan, P. P., and Morrow, N. R. 1995. Effect of wettability on waterflood recovery for crude oil/ brine/rock systems. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 10 (1), 40-46.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jerauld, G.R., Lin, C.Y., Kevin J. Webb, and Jim C. Seccombe. 2008. Modeling Low-Salinity Waterflooding, Paper SPE 102239 presented at Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24–27 September.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, H., Nuryaningsih, L., and Adidharma, H. 2010. The Effect of Salinity of Injection Brine on Water Alternating Gas Performance in Tertiary Miscible Carbon Dioxide Flooding: Experimental Study. SPE Western Regional Meeting. Anaheim, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kulkarni, M. M., and Rao, D. N. 2004. Experimental investigation of various methods of tertiary gas injection. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lager, A., Webb, KJ., Black, CJ.J., Singleton, M., and Sorbie, K.S. 2006. Low Salinity Oil Recovery- An Experimental Investigation, Paper SCA 2006-36 presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysis, Trondheim, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lager, A., Webb, K., Collins, I., and Richmond, D. 2008. LoSal enhanced oil recovery: Evidence of enhanced oil recovery at the reservoir scale. SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ligthelm, D.I., Gronsveld, J., Hoffman, I.P., Brusse, N.J., Marcelis, F. and Van Der Linde, H. 2009. Waterflooding Strategy by Manipulation of Injection Brine Composition. Paper SPE 119835.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maheshwari, Y. K. 2011. A Comparative Simulation Study of Chemical EOR Methodologies (Alkaline, Surfactant and/or Polymer) Applied to Norne Field E-Segment, PhD diss., Master thesis, NTNU.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McGuire, P.I., Chatman, J.R., Paskvan, F.K., Sommer D.M., and Carini F.H. 2005. Low Salinity Oil Recovery: An Exciting New EOR Opportunity for Alaska’s North Slope. Paper SPE 93903 presented at 2005 SPE Western Regional Meeting, Irvine, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Molina, N.N.1980. A Systematic Approach To The Relative Permeability Problem in Reservoir Simulation. Paper SPE 9234 presented at the 55th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SPE, Dallas, Texas, 21 – 24 September.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morrow, N. R., Tang, G. Q., Valat, M., and Xie, X. 1998. Prospects of improved oil recovery related to wettability and brine composition. Journal of Petroleum science and Engineering, 20 (3), 267-276.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Osoba, J. S., Richardson, J. G., Kerver, J. K., Hafford, J. A., and Blair, P. M. 1951. Laboratory measurements of relative permeability. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 3(2), 47-56.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sayegh, S. G., and Najman, J. 1987. Phase behavior measurements of CO2‐SO2‐brine mixtures. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 65 (2), 314-320.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Seccombe, J., Lager, A., Webb, K., Jerauld, G., and Fueg, E. 2008. Improving Wateflood Recovery: LoSalTM EOR Field Evaluation. In SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tang, G. Q., & Morrow, N. R. 1997. Salinity, temperature, oil composition, and oil recovery by waterflooding. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12 (4), 269-276.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tang, G. Q., & Morrow, N. R. 1999. Influence of brine composition and fines migration on crude oil/brine/rock interactions and oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 24(2), 99-111.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Webb, K. J., Black, C. J. J., and Edmonds, I. J. 2005. Low salinity oil recovery–The role of reservoir condition corefloods. In 13th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yildiz, H. O., and Morrow, N. R. 1996. Effect of brine composition on recovery of Moutray crude oil by waterflooding. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 14(3), 159-168.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yousef, A., Al-Saleh, S., Al-Kaabi, A., and Al-Jawfi, M. October. Laboratory investigation of novel oil recovery method for carbonate reservoirs. In Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali F. Alta’ee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yip, P.M., Alta’ee, A.F. (2015). Simulation Study of the Effect of Smart Water on Relative Permeability During WAG-CO2 Injection for Light Oil Reservoir. In: Awang, M., Negash, B., Md Akhir, N., Lubis, L. (eds) ICIPEG 2014. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-368-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-368-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-367-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-368-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics