Technology in Education

  • John Vong
  • Insu Song
Part of the Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics book series (TIEI, volume 11)


Supporting diverse and rapidly changing learning styles of new digital age generations is a major hurdle in the age of massification of education markets. The institutions must now utilize the unprecedented network speed and mobile technology to stimulating learning environments for the new digital age generations. Institutions need to accommodate different learning styles of students often comprising of working professionals, different age groups and students from cultural backgrounds. Researchers have been trying solve these challenges through flexible learning and blended learning approaches. Faced with new digital age generations, unprecedented network speed and mobile technology, researchers now frequently quote mobilized curriculum, social-interaction oriented learning, personalized learning and collaborative mobile learning. This chapter reviews relevant education models, learning styles, literature, and technology to help identify new emerging research problems and research methodologies in m-learning.


Technology in education Blended learning Mobile learning Collaborative learning m-Learning 


  1. Boticki I, Wong LH, Looi CK (2013) Designing technology for content-independent collaborative mobile learning. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 6(1):14–24. doi: 10.1109/tlt.2012.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Churchill D, Churchill N (2008) Educational affordances of PDAs: a study of a teacher’s exploration of this technology. Comput Educ 50(4):1439–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conole G (2004) E-learning: the hype and the reality. J Interact Media Educ 2004(2):21. doi: 10.5334/2004-12
  4. Coulby C, Hennessey S, Davies N, Fuller R (2011) The use of mobile technology for work-based assessment: the student experience. Br J Educ Technol 42(2):251–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01022.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. David BT, Yin C, Chalon R (2007) Contextual mobile learning for appliance mastery. In: Proceedings of mobile learning:3–10Google Scholar
  6. Devlin M (2012) Non-traditional student achievement: theory, policy and practice in Australian higher education. In: FYHE 2010 Aspiration, Access, Achievement: Proceedings of the 13th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference 2010. Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  7. Ellaway R (2010) Apples and architraves: a descriptive framework for e-learning research. Med Teach 32(1):95–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hardyman W, Bullock A, Brown A, Carter-Ingram S, Stacey M (2013) Mobile technology supporting trainee doctors’ workplace learning and patient care: an evaluation. BMC medical education 13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-6
  9. James PT (2011) mobile-learning-thai HE student perceptions and potential technology impacts. Int Educ Stud 4(2):182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones A, Issroff K (2007) Motivation and mobile devices: exploring the role of appropriation and coping strategies. Res Learn Technol 15(3):247–258Google Scholar
  11. Kneebone R, Brenton H (2005) Training perioperative specialist practitioners. Mobile learning: a handbook for educators and trainers. Routledge, Milton Park, pp 106–115Google Scholar
  12. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, vol 1. Prentice-Hall Englewood, CliffsGoogle Scholar
  13. Kramer M (2009) Deciphering the future of learning through daily observation. Paper presented at the 3rd WLE mobile learning symposium: mobile learning cultures across education, work and leisure, WLE Centre, IOE, London, 27 March 2009Google Scholar
  14. Laurillard D (2007) Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: framing research questions. WLE Center, London, pp 151–173Google Scholar
  15. Lefoe GE, Hedberg J (2006) Blending on and off campus: a tale of two cities. In Bonk C, Graham CR (eds) The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs, pp 325–337Google Scholar
  16. McInnis C, Hartley R (2002) Managing study and work: the impact of full-time study and paid work on the undergraduate experience in Australian Universities. DEST, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Norris C, Soloway E (2008) Getting mobile handhelds help bring K-12 classrooms into the 21st century. District Administration Magazine, Professional Media Group, LLC, CT. Available at Accessed 20 Oct 2010
  18. Patten B, Arnedillo Sánchez I, Tangney B (2006) Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Comput Educ 46(3):294–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schank RC, Fano A, Bell B, Jona M (1994) The design of goal-based scenarios. J Learn Sci 3(4):305–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharpe R, Benfield G, Roberts G, Francis R (2006) The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. Higher Education Academy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Song YJ, Wong LH, Looi CK (2012) Fostering personalized learning in science inquiry supported by mobile technologies. Educ Technol Res Dev (ETRD) 60(4):679–701. doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9245-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ting YL (2013) Using mobile technologies to create interwoven learning interactions: an intuitive design and its evaluation. Comput Educ 60(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.004
  23. Zhang B, Looi C-K, Seow P, Chia G, Wong L-H, Chen W, So H-J, Soloway E, Norris C (2010) Deconstructing and reconstructing: transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum. Comput Educ 55(4):1504–1523. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.016

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Financial IT AcademySingapore Management UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.School of Business (IT)James Cook UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations