Skip to main content

Microscopic Image and Text Examination of Conventional and Digital Printouts

  • Conference paper
  • 1571 Accesses

Abstract

The widespread use of printers and computers has led to an increase in the use of print documents in daily life. Mass print and automatic print quality evaluation is necessary in the fast print process to avoid the quality defect immediately when it appears. Furthermore, in many cases, print materials are dangerous tools for many criminal and terrorist acts. For instance, there were accounts of forged contracts before which led to the implementation of print identification. With the technology that is evolving for both conventional and digital printing, it is easy to lose track of the many processes and the many variables in each process. Digital printouts often appear similar. Nevertheless, comparing digital and conventional printouts can be confusing. This research aims to examine digital and conventional printouts and investigate whether digital printouts are significantly different than conventional printouts which can then be used for management and control purposes. Prior efforts to characterize digital and conventional printouts have been made. Microscopic examinations were employed in order to evaluate the printout quality and identify the source of the printouts intelligently; with the use of stereo microscope that provides a magnified view (up to approximately 20× 40×) of its edges and surface, additional information will be gathered. The print identification checklist was employed to keep track of the observations during identification. The experimental results are presented and analyzed. Based on the findings, stereo microscopic examination reveals that every printing process has its own strength and weaknesses. This revelation helps the researcher to classify the printing processes according to its potential application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Waite, J. J. (2003). Conventional offset lithography and direct digital printing devices: How do they compete on print characteristics? Visual Communications Journal, 1–15. http://www.igaea.org/International-Graphic-Arts-Education-Association/visual-communications-journal.html; http://www.igaea.org/images/stories/vcj/2003VCJ.pdf

  2. Viluksela, P., Kariniemi, M., & Nors, M. (2010). Environmental performance of digital printing literature study. Vuorimiehentie Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tu Yankai, Chen Qinghu Lijuan, & Deng Wei. (2009). Print quality assessment and identification: Evaluation of print edge roughness. Wuhan: School of Electronic Information Wuhan University.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bann, D. (2006). Book reference, print production book “an introduction to the processes” (pp. 88–111).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johansson, K., et al. (2011). A guide to graphic print production (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Printing process descriptions environmental printing: The printer’s National Environmental Assistance Center. www.pnear.org

  7. Lentilucci, Emmett. 1994. Fundamentals of Xerography. http://www.cis.rit.edu/~ejipci/Reports/Xerography.pdfAccessed 30 April 2015.

  8. C. Baker, Ronald. 2011. Digital Printing Vs Traditional Printing. http://ezinearticles.com/?Digital-Printing-Vs-Traditional-Printing&id=6464931. Accessed 30 April 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (UiTM), for the financial support under the Dana Pembudayaan Penyelidikan (RAGS), Ministry Of Education (MOE) Malaysia, and Faculty of Art and Design, UiTM, and to all the printing companies which took part in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Yusuf Masod .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Masod, M.Y., Mohamad, M., Yahya, M.F.Z.R. (2015). Microscopic Image and Text Examination of Conventional and Digital Printouts. In: Hassan, O., Abidin, S., Legino, R., Anwar, R., Kamaruzaman, M. (eds) International Colloquium of Art and Design Education Research (i-CADER 2014). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-332-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics