Advertisement

Games-to-Teach or Games-to-Learn: Addressing the Learning Needs of Twenty-First Century Education Through Performance

  • Yam San CheeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Education Innovation Series book series (EDIN)

Abstract

In this chapter, I describe my observation of the two main approaches to game-based learning evident in research today. The dominant approach is one characterized by games-to-teach. This approach is rooted in cognitive science and instructional theory. It is driven by the goal of meeting the present needs of schooling, as predominantly practiced, and by meeting perceived needs related to schooling: assessing student learning outcomes objectively, improving test scores, increasing student motivation, and deepening learning engagement. While these objectives are legitimate in their own right, they ignore, or at the very least fail to respond to, the increasingly urgent learning needs and lifeworlds of students living in the twenty-first century. By way of contrast, the games-to-learn approach is grounded in sociocultural and hermeneutic approaches to education and based on learning design. Within the context of the latter, I articulate a performance-centric approach to game-based learning that subsumes play and dialog as a model of learning befitting our times.

Keywords

Games-to-teach Games-to-learn Educating Schooling Performance Play Dialog 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The National Research Foundation, Singapore, provided initial funding for the Statecraft X project through grant number NRF2007–IDM005–MOE–007CYS. Exemplar data is drawn from project OER 2/11CYS funded by the Office of Education Research. The assistance of Swati Mehrotra, Liu Qiang, Shoon Ming Hui, Ong Jing Chuan, and Tien Yuan is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Abt, C. C. (1970). Serious games. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, G., & Evans, M. D. (2006). A different three Rs for education: Reason, relationality, rhythm. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baumann, R. (1989). Performance. In E. Barnouw (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 3, pp. 262–266). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, E. (2008). Theories of performance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Bergson, H. (1913/2007). An introduction to metaphysics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
  10. Broadfoot, P. (2009). Signs of change: Assessment past, present and future. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century: Connecting theory and practice (pp. v–xi). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Buckingham, D. (Ed.). (2008). Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bunin, N., & Yu, J. (2009). The Blackwell dictionary of western philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Caillois, R. (1958/2001). Man, play and games (M. Barash, Trans.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, M. (2004). Performance: A critical introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Castronova, E. (2007). Exodus to the virtual world: How online fun is changing reality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Chee, Y. S. (2010). Studying learners and assessing learning: A process-relational perspective on the learning sciences. Educational Technology, 50(5), 5–9.Google Scholar
  17. Chee, Y. S. (2011). Learning as becoming through performance, play, and dialog: A model of game-based learning with the game Legends of Alkhimia. Digital Culture and Education, 3(2), 98–122.Google Scholar
  18. Chee, Y. S. (2013). Video games for “deep learning”: Game-based learning as performance in the Statecraft X curriculum. In C. B. Lee & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Fostering conceptual change with technology: Asian perspectives (pp. 199–224). Singapore: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  19. Chee, Y. S., Gwee, S., & Tan, E. M. (2011a). Learning to become citizens by enacting governorship in the Statecraft curriculum: An evaluation of learning outcomes. International Journal of Gaming and Computer Mediated Simulations, 3(2), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chee, Y. S., Loke, S. K., & Tan, E. M. (2011b). Learning as becoming: Values, identity, and performance in the enaction of citizenship education through game play. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Discoveries in gaming and computer-mediated simulations: New interdisciplinary applications (pp. 128–146). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chee, Y. S., Mehrotra, S., & Liu, Q. (2012a). Effective citizenship education through mobile game based learning: The Statecraft X curriculum. In P. Felicia (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th European conference on games based learning (pp. 117–124). Reading: Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Chee, Y. S., Mehrotra, S., & Ong, J. C. (2012b). Reflective, reflexive guided appropriation: Facilitating teacher adoption of game based learning in classrooms. In P. Felicia (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th European conference on games based learning (pp. 109–116). Reading: Academic.Google Scholar
  23. Chee, Y. S., Tan, K. C. D., Tan, E. M., & Jan, M. (2012c). Learning chemistry performatively: Epistemological and pedagogical bases of design-for-learning with computer and video games. In K. C. D. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research: Moving forward (pp. 245–262). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Collen, A. (2003). Systemic change through praxis and inquiry. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Dewey, J. (1897/2004). My pedagogic creed. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 17–23). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  27. Dewey, J. (1911/1998). The problem of truth. In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey (Ethics, logic, psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 101–130). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dewey, J. (1916/1980). An added note as to the “practical”. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works (Vol. 10, pp. 366–369). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dewey, J. (1925/1988). Experience and nature (John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Vol. 1). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Dewey, J. (1938/1991). Logic: The theory of inquiry (The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, Vol. 12). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Dewey, J. (1949/1991). Importance, significance, meaning. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 16, pp. 318–332). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949/1991). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 16, pp. 1–294). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Dovey, J., & Kennedy, H. W. (2006). Game cultures: Computer games as new media. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Fairfield, P. (2000). Theorizing praxis: Studies in hermeneutical pragmatism (New perspectives in philosophical texts and issues, Vol. 15). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Fairfield, P. (2011). Philosophical hermeneutics reinterpreted: Dialogues with existentialism, pragmatism, critical theory and postmodernism. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  36. Ferré, F. (1996). Being and value: Toward a constructive postmodern metaphysics. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ferré, F. (1998). Knowing and value: Toward a constructive postmodern epistemology. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gadamer, H.-G. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. E. Linge, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (Second Rev. ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  40. Garrison, J. (1999). John Dewey’s theory of practical reasoning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31(3), 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional “trans-action”: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(4), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gascoigne, N. (2008). Richard Rorty: Liberalism, irony, and the ends of philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Gee, J. P. (2004). New times and new literacies: Themes for a changing world. In A. F. Ball & W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 279–306). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (Rev. and updated ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Greetham, B. (2006). Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  48. Heidegger, M. (1953/1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  49. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Huizinga, J. (1938/1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (Eds.). (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Kirschner, S. R., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (2010). The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Klabbers, J. (2006). The magic circle: Principles of gaming and simulation. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Klages, M. (2006). Literary theory: A guide for the perplexed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  55. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1999). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 2, affective domain (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  56. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Lanvin, T. Z. (1991). Introduction. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 16, pp. ix–xxxviii). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (2009). New media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Marzano, R. J., & Heflebower, T. (2012). Teaching and assessing 21st century skills. Bloomington: Marzano Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  60. Maxwell, G. S. (2009). Defining standards for the 21st century. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century: Connecting theory and practice (pp. 263–286). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McMillan, J. H. (2008). Assessment essentials for standards-based education (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  62. Mesle, C. R. (2008). Process-relational philosophy: An introduction to Alfred North Whitehead. West Conshohocken: Temple Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  63. Miller, L. M., Chang, C.-I., Wang, S., Beier, M. E., & Klisch, Y. (2011). Learning and motivational impacts of a multimedia science game. Computers and Education, 57, 1425–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nayar, P. K. (2010). An introduction to new media and cybercultures. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers and Education, 52, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Postman, N. (1995). The end of education: Redefining the value of school. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  68. Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. (1969). Teaching as a subversive activity. New York: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
  69. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  70. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  71. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  72. Rescher, N. (1996). Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  73. Rescher, N. (2000). Process philosophy: A survey of basic issues. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rescher, N. (2006). Process philosophical deliberations. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Ryle, G. (1949/2009). The concept of mind (60th anniversary ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Schechner, R. (2003). Performance theory (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Schechner, R. (2006). Performance studies: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Selfe, C. L., & Hawisher, G. E. (Eds.). (2007). Gaming lives in the twenty-first century: Literate connections. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  80. Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, education, and becoming. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  82. Stites, R. (1999). A user’s guide to standards-based educational reform: From theory to practice. Focus on Basics: Connecting Research & Practice, 3(C). Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/?id=352
  83. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  84. Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (Corrected ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  85. Zyda, M. (2005). From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. IEEE Computer, 38(9), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations