Abstract
In recent times, there exists an increasing interest in the concept of embodiment in all disciplines dealing with knowledge and intelligent behaviour, especially that of the learning sciences. While embodiment has often been used in its simplest form, i.e. ‘intelligence requires a body’ (Weigmann 2012), there now exist deeper issues concerning the complex interplay between problems of physical-virtual embodiment, complexities of the environment, and the principles of neural development within today’s evolved culture of participation where more and more students communicate, interact, and socialise through immersive new media environments, represented by avatars. This chapter looks at the major conceptual developments in embodiment research from the works of ancient philosopher Aristotle to contemporary roboticist Moravec, positing that the current state of embodiment research reverberates of dichotomised conceptualisations of natural states vis-à-vis artificial forms of embodiment. Against this binary backdrop, concepts of autopoiesis and allopoiesis are reconceptualised in the context of twenty-first century media, pointing to the need for a new theoretical understanding of embodying. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the pedagogical possibilities in this realm of new media and learning where conventional constraints of embodiment are challenged, advocating the need for educators to devise creative pedagogical approaches that work with these new articulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Second Life is chosen as a concretising example among the multitude of other virtual interfaces (e.g. hypertext websites, online games, online chatrooms) due to its pervasiveness at the current time of writing, demonstrated by 41 million registered SL users, with an average of about 40,000 users logged on at any one time in world.
References
Anderson, J., Reder, L., & Simon, H. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25, 5–11.
Arkin, R. (1998). Behavior-based robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Arnold, M. (2002). The glass screen. Information, Communication and Society, 5(2), 225–236.
Barlow, J. P. (1996). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. San Francisco: Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Barsalou, L., Niedenthal, P., Barbey, A., & Ruppert, J. (2003). Social embodiment. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego: Academic. Retrieved December 10, 2012, from http://www.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html
Bayne, T. (2004). The bodies of learners. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Publishing.
Benjamin, A. (1994). Affordable, restructured education: A solution through information technology. RSA Journal, 142, 45–49.
Breazeal, C., & Scassellati, B. (2000). Infant-like social interactions between a robot and a human caregiver. Adaptive Behavior, 8(1), 47–72.
Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159.
Brooks, R. A., & Stein, A. (1993). Building brains for bodies (Memo No. 1439). Cambridge, MA: MIT AI Laboratory.
Burkitt, I. (1999). Bodies of thought: Embodiment, identity and modernity. London: Sage.
Chee, Y. S. (2007). Embodiment, embeddedness, and experience: Game-based learning and the construction of identity. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 3–30.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper and Row.
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (1999). Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition. In W. Betchel & G. Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
de Freitas, S. (2006). Using games and simulations for supporting learning. In C. Martin & L. Murray (Eds.), Learning, media and technology special issue on gaming, 31(4), 343–358.
Dreyfus, H. L. (2001). On the Internet. London: Routledge.
Everard, J. (2000). Virtual states: The internet and the boundaries of the nation-state. London: Routledge.
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Clarendon.
Greeno, J. (1996) On claims that answer the wrong questions (Response to Anderson et al.). Educational Researcher, 25, 5–11.
Haugeland, J. (1998). Mind embodied and embedded. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Having thought(pp. 3–38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N. K. (2002). Flesh and metal: Reconfiguring the mindbody in virtual environments. Configurations, 10, 319.
Hocking, B., Haskell, J., & Linds, W. (2001). Unfolding bodymind: Exploring possibility through education. Brandon: Foundation for Educational Renewal.
Hoffman, G. (2012). Embodied cognition for autonomous interactive robots. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 759–772.
Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. London: Harvard University Press.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jenkins, H. (2012). Quentin Tarantino’s star wars? Digital cinema, media convergence, and participatory culture. In M. G. Durham & D. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (pp. 567–568). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kelso, S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kirsh, D. (1992). Today the earwig, tomorrow man? In D. Kirsh (Ed.), Foundations of artificial intelligence (pp. 161–184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klich, R. (2007). Performing posthuman perspective: Can you see me now? Journal of Media Arts Culture, 4(1). Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=91
Krois, J. M., Rosengren, M., Steidele, A., & Westerkamp, D. (2008). Embodiment in cognition and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=91
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Land, R. (2004). Issues of embodiment and risk in online learning. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE conference (pp. 530–538). Perth: ASCILITE.
Linden Lab. (2014). Linden Lab is developing the next-generation virtual world. Retrieved July 11, 2014, from http://www.lindenlab.com/releases/linden-lab-is-developing-the-next-generation-virtual-world
Marocco, D., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, K., & Belpaeme, T. (2010). Grounding action words in the sensorimotor interaction with the world: Experiments with a simulated iCub humanoid robot. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 4.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
McWilliam, E., & Taylor, P. (1996). Pedagogy, technology and the body. New York: Peter Lang.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
Moravec, H. (1988). Mind children: The future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peters, M. (2002). Dreyfus on the Internet: Platonism, body talk and nihilism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(4), 403–406.
Pfeifer, P., & Bongard, J. (2007). How the body shapes the way we think: A new view of intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Port, R., & van Gelder, T. (1995). Mind as motion: Dynamics, behavior, and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Poster, M. (2001). Cyberdemocracy: The Internet and the public sphere. In M. Poster (Ed.), The information subject. Amsterdam: G + B Arts International.
Regier, T. (1996). The human semantic potential. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, termites and traffic jams. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shapiro, S. (1994). Re-membering the body in critical pedagogy. Education and Society, 12(1), 61–79.
Sharkey, N., & Ziemke, T. (2001). Mechanistic vs. phenomenal embodiment – Can robot embodiment lead to strong AI? Cognitive Systems Research, 2(4), 251–262.
Shim, Y., & Husbands, P. (2012). Chaotic exploration and learning of locomotion behaviours. Neural Computation, 24(8), 2185–2222.
Suchman, A. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433–460.
Turkle, S. (1996). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. London: Phoenix.
Turvey, M., & Carello, C. (1995). Some dynamical themes in perception and action. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion (pp. 373–401). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Von Uexkull, J. (1934). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In C. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior. New York: International Universities Press.
Weigmann, K. (2012). Does intelligence require a body? Science and Society, 13(12), 1066–1069.
Weiss, H. (1948). Aristotle’s teleology and Uexkull’s theory of living nature. The Classical Quarterly, 42(1/2), 44–58.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 625–636.
Ziemke, T. (1999). Rethinking grounding. In A. Riegler et al. (Eds.), Understanding representation in the cognitive science. New York: Plenum Press.
Ziemke, T. (2001). The construction of ‘reality’ in the robot. Foundations of Science, 6(1), 163–233.
Ziemke, T. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on situated and embodied cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 3(3), 271–274.
Ziemke, T. (2003). What’s that thing called embodiment? In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1134–1139). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zlatev, J. (1997). Situated embodiment: Studies in the emergence of spatial meaning. Stockholm: Gotab.
Zlatev, J. (2001). The epigenesis of meaning in human beings, and possibly in robots. Minds and Machines, 11, 155–195.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jamaludin, A. (2015). Learning, Becoming, Embodying: A Review of Embodiment in an Era of Learning with Contemporary Media. In: Lin, TB., Chen, V., Chai, C. (eds) New Media and Learning in the 21st Century. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-326-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-326-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-325-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-326-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)