Skip to main content

Centralized Charging Control of Plug-in Electric Vehicles and Effects on Day-Ahead Electricity Market Price

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plug In Electric Vehicles in Smart Grids

Part of the book series: Power Systems ((POWSYS))

Abstract

Global policy targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions have led to increased interest in plug-in electric vehicles (PEV) and their integration into the electricity network. Existing electricity markets, however, are not well suited to encourage direct participation of flexible demand from small consumers such as PEV owners. The introduction of an aggregator agent with the functions of gathering, aggregating, controlling and representing the energy needs of PEV owners in the electricity market could prove useful in this regard. In this chapter, a mathematical model of PEV aggregator for participation in the day-ahead electricity market is described. The modeling is done by treating each of the individual vehicle batteries as a single large battery. The centralized charging and discharging of this battery is then scheduled based on the traveling needs of the PEV owners determined by an aggregated driving profile and the cumulative electrical energy needs of vehicles over the optimization horizon. Two methods for scheduling PEV demand named as joint scheduling method (JSM) and aggregator scheduling method (ASM) are presented. The two methods are subsequently used to observe the effects of introducing flexible scheduling of PEVs on the day-ahead market price in an IEEE test system and a Nordic test system. Results from the IEEE test system case studies will indicate that the scheduling of PEV energy through direct centralized control at high PEV penetration levels of 50 % or greater could lead to potential lowering of day-ahead market prices as compared to an indirect control method such as the use of fixed period charging. Results from the Nordic test system case study shows that controlled scheduling of PEV demand could lead to only a small increase in day-ahead market price of electricity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC. Official J Eur Union

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD Publishing (2010) World energy outlook 2010. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Ebrary, Inc. (distributor), Washington, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boulanger AG, Chu AC, Maxx S, Waltz DL (2011) Vehicle electrification: status and issues. Proc IEEE 99:1116–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nord Pool Spot (2013) The nordic electricity exchange and the nordic model for a liberalized electricity market. http://nordpoolspot.com/globalassets/download-center/rules-and-regulations/the-nordic-electricity-exchange-and-the-nordic-model-for-a-liberalized-electricity-market.pdf . Accessed 10 November 2014

  5. Nord Pool Spot (2013) Nord Pool Spot—Europe’s leading power markets. http://nordpoolspot.com/globalassets/download-center/annual-report/nord-pool-spot_europes-leading-power-markets.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2014

  6. Kirschen D, Strbac G (2005) Basic concepts from economics. Fundamentals of power system economics. Wiley, New York, pp 11–47

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gellings CW, Barron W, Betley FM, England WA, Preiss LL, Jones DE (1986) Integrating demand-side management into utility planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.1986.4334958

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lampropoulos I, Kling WL, Ribeiro PF, van den Berg J (2013) History of demand side management and classification of demand response control schemes. In: 2013 IEEE power and energy society general meeting (PES), pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smart Energy Demand Coalition (2014) Mapping demand response in Europe today. http://sedc-coalition.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/SEDC-Mapping_DR_In_Europe-2014-04111.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2014

  10. PJM (2014) Demand response. http://www.pjm.com/markets-and-operations/demand-response.aspx. Accessed 5 May 2014

  11. Monitoring Analytics (2009) Barriers to demand side response in PJM. The independent market monitor for PJM. http://www.monitoringanalytics.com/reports/Reports/2009/Barriers_to_Demand_Side_Response_in_PJM_20090701.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2014

  12. Lopes JAP, Soares FJ, Almeida PMR (2011) Integration of electric vehicles in the electric power system. Proc IEEE 99:168–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hay C et al (2010) Introducing electric vehicles into the current electricity market. EDISON Project. http://www.edison-net.dk/Dissemination/Reports/Report_004.aspx. Accessed 10 November 2014

  14. Andersson SL, Elofsson AK, Galus MD, Göransson L, Karlsson S, Johnsson F, Andersson G (2010) Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles as regulating power providers: case studies of Sweden and Germany. Energy Policy 38:2751–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Balram P, Tuan LA, Bertling Tjernberg L (2012) Effects of plug-in electric vehicle charge scheduling on the day-ahead electricity market price. In: 2012 3rd IEEE PES international conference and exhibition on innovative smart grid technologies (ISGT Europe), pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arroyo JM, Conejo AJ (2002) Multiperiod auction for a pool-based electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17:1225–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhattacharya K, Bollen MH, Daalder JE (2001) Operation of restructured power systems. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  18. Balram P, Tuan LA, Bertling Tjernberg L (2013) Stochastic programming based model of an electricity retailer considering uncertainty associated with electric vehicle charging. In: 2013 10th international conference on the European energy market (EEM), pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Silva V (2011) Estimation of innovative operational processes and grid management for the integration of EV. Grid for Vehicles. http://www.g4v.eu/datas/reports/G4V_WP6_D6_2_grid_management.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2014

  20. Work Package 1.3: Parameter manual. Grid for vehicles (G4 V) project. http://g4v.eu/datas/Parameter_Manual_WP1_3_RWTH_101216.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2014

  21. Battery university (2014) Charging lithium-ion batteries. http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/charging_lithium_ion_batteries

  22. Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Li Z (2002) Market operations in electric power systems: forecasting, scheduling, and risk management. Wiley Online Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. EURELECTRIC (2009) Statistics and prospects for the European electricity sector, 37th edn, EURPROG 2009

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nord Pool Spot (2012) Power plant units (installed generation capacity greater than 100 MW)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Swedish Energy Agency (2004) The energy market 2004. https://energimyndigheten.a-w2m.se/FolderContents.mvc/Download?ResourceId=2163. Accessed 10 November 2014

  26. Energy in Sweden (2014) Facts and figures (excel) 2014

    Google Scholar 

  27. Doorman G, Kjølle GH, Uhlen K, Huse ES, Flatabø N (2004) Vulnerability of the Nordic power system. Report to the Nordic Council of Ministers, SINTEF Energy Research

    Google Scholar 

  28. Statistics Norway (2012) Stock of vehicles and population, by County

    Google Scholar 

  29. Statistics Sweden (2013) Vehicles in counties and municipalities at the turn of year 2013/2014

    Google Scholar 

  30. Statistics Finland (2013) Motor vehicle stock

    Google Scholar 

  31. Statistics Denmark (2012) Motor vehicles registered 1 January by reporting country, vehicle and time

    Google Scholar 

  32. ENTSO-E (2014) Maximum NTC. European network of transmission system operators for electricity (ENTSO-E)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grigg C, Wong P, Albrecht P et al (1999) The IEEE reliability test system-1996. A report prepared by the reliability test system task force of the application of probability methods subcommittee. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14:1010–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support provided by E.ON Sverige AB for the project ‘E.ON A2Future Electric Power Systems’ within the E.ON-Chalmers collaboration framework.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavan Balram .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balram, P., Tuan, L.A., Tjernberg, L.B. (2015). Centralized Charging Control of Plug-in Electric Vehicles and Effects on Day-Ahead Electricity Market Price. In: Rajakaruna, S., Shahnia, F., Ghosh, A. (eds) Plug In Electric Vehicles in Smart Grids. Power Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-317-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-317-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-316-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-317-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics