A Review of Social Life Cycle Assessment Methodologies
Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) is emerging as a powerful and necessary tool in sustainability science. With its great flexibility, SLCA can be applied toward quantifying social impacts on a system. However, the literature lacks a review of the current methods that hinder its applicability. This chapter provides an overview of the popular methods in SCLA, including process identifications and quantifications. Specifically, we review the four methods of Dreyer, Norris, Hunkeler, and Weidema. We found that the definition of human well-being seems to be the basis for all SLCAs. The SLCA method can effectively measure social impacts and provide a sound basis for decision-making. Case studies are included in the chapter to illustrate the applications.
KeywordsSLCA Tutorial Quantification Measurement Social indicator
We would like to thank the National Science Foundation (NSF) Sustainable Energy Pathways Program for their financial support of our sustainability research in the production of thin-film solar cells from earth-abundant, environmentally benign materials. The fund is under CHE—1230246 to Yanfa Yan and others at the University of Toledo.
- Baumann, H., & Tillman, A. M. (2004). The Hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA, an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Sweden: Baltic University Press.Google Scholar
- Bloch, A. (2003). Murphy’s Law. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Fava, J.A., & Society of Toxicology and Chemistry (1993). A conceptual framework for life-cycle impact asessment: February 1–7, 1992. Sandestin: SETAC.Google Scholar
- Fowler, F. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Freudenburg, W. R. (1986). Social impact assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 451–478.Google Scholar
- Goedkoop, M., & Spriensma, R. (1999). The Eco-indicator 99, methodology report. A damage oriented LCIA method.” The Hague: VROM.Google Scholar
- Grießhammer, R., Benoît, C., Dreyer, L., Flysjö, A., Manhart, A., Mazijn, B., Méthot, L., Weidema, B. (2006). “Feasibility study: Integration of social aspects into LCA”. Retrieved September 11, https://biblio.ugent.be/input/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=512499&fileOId=633083.pdf.
- Kraut, R. (2002). Aristotle: Political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Weidema, BP (2006b). Social Impact Categories, Indicators, Characterisation and Damage Modelling. Presentation for the 29th Swiss LCA Discussion Forum.Google Scholar