Skip to main content

Supporting the Needs of Twenty-First Century Learners: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Motivation, Leadership and Curriculum design

Abstract

Across cultural contexts, individuals who persist in digital virtual worlds largely do so because the experience satisfies students’ desires for autonomy, relatedness, and competence. Similarly, in nondigital learning environments, the alignment of teachers’ practices with students’ needs has been shown to reflect positive in-class engagement and learning outcomes. New technologies provide learners with increased opportunities for interaction with learning material, from individual smartphone and tablet applications to digital whiteboards structuring whole-class instruction to entirely online learning environments with no classroom structure. As the use of these advances becomes increasingly normalized in the sphere of education, students rapidly grow accustomed to their use. As of yet, a gap still exists between the design of online learning environments and their ability to satisfy both motivational and learning outcomes. From a self-determined motivational perspective, however novel and initially interesting these technologies may be, their use will have a limited long-term effect on learning and instruction if they are not able to meet students’ basic psychological needs of autonomy, relatedness, and competence. This chapter offers a discussion of the self-determination theory of motivation in relation to previous findings on engagement with digital environments, classroom learning environments, and offers a theoretical discussion on how the differences and similarities may be reconciled in order to better motivate learners of the Net Generation toward positive learning outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States (pp. 1–47). Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf. Retrieved 4 October 2013.

  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. doi:10.1348/000709902158883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1773–1802. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00428.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120(3), 322–330. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (2009). Connecting with the big picture. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 147–157. doi:10.1080/00461520902832400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Narcissism on Facebook: Self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 482–486. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K.-C., & Jang, S.-J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741–752. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (2013). Children’s and young people’s reading in 2012: Findings from the 2012 national literacy trust’s annual survey (pp. 1–68). London: National Literacy Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 347–362. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143. doi:10.3102/003465430298563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27. doi:10.3102/00346543071001001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, S. E., James, B., Eslick, A. N., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012). Cognitive pitfall! Videogame players are not immune to dual-task costs. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 803–809. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0323-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J., & Garza, A. (2011). Call of (civic) duty: Action games and civic behavior in a large sample of youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 770–775. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J., & Olson, C. K. (2012). Friends, fun, frustration and fantasy: Child motivations for video game play. Motivation and Emotion, 37(1), 154–164. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9284-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906–914. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, L. K., Bovee, H. N., & Nakao, K. (2014). E-learning: Reasons students in language learning courses don’t want to. Computers & Education, 74(C), 26–36. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D. (2000). “You can always look it up…” or can you? American Educator, 24(1), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, M., Schmid, S., Fries, S., Kilian, B., & Kuhnle, C. (2010). Reciprocal relationships between value orientation and motivational interference during studying and leisure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 623–645. doi:10.1348/000709910x492180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, M., Kuhnle, C., Kilian, B., Marta, E., & Fries, S. (2011). Motivational interference in school-leisure conflict and learning outcomes: The differential effects of two value conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 301–316. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 588–600. doi:10.1037/a0019682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175–1188. doi:10.1037/a0028089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Job, V., Dweck, C., & Walton, G. (2010). Ego depletion—is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1686–1693. doi:10.1177/0956797610384745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2006). When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 429–442. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, I., Kaplan, A., & Gueta, G. (2009). Students’ needs, teachers’ support, and motivation for doing homework: A cross-sectional study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(2), 246–267. doi:10.1080/00220970903292868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, I., Eilot, K., & Nevo, N. (2013). “I’ll do it later”: Type of motivation, self-efficacy and homework procrastination. Motivation and Emotion. doi:10.1007/s11031-013-9366-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan Academy. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2013 from https://www.khanacademy.org.

  • Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Vallerand, R. J., Donahue, E. G., & Lavigne, G. L. (2009). On the costs and benefits of gaming: The role of passion. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(3), 285–290. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating and inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. doi:10.1080/00220480009596759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K. J., Tan, O. S., Koh, C., & Ee, J. (2008). A self-determination approach to understanding students’ motivation in project work. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 139–145. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., Parada, R. H., Craven, R. G., & Hamilton, L. R. (2011). Construct validity of the multidimensional structure of bullying and victimization: An application of exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 701–732. doi:10.1037/a0024122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365. doi:10.3102/0034654308325583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuthall, G. (2002). The cultural myths and realities of teaching and learning. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 11, 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154–166. doi:10.1037/a0019440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. K. (2009). Virtual worlds and the learner hero: How today’s video games can inform tomorrow’s digital learning environments. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 214–223. doi:10.1177/1477878509104326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344–360. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L., & Gagné, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 159–168. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62(C), 24–31. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, L. (2011). The multiplayer classroom. Boston: Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57–68. doi:10.1348/000709908x304398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. doi:10.1037/a0012840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J., Higgins, S. E., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91–101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroback, T., Frensch, P. A., & Schubert, T. (2012). Video game practice optimizes executive control skills in dual-task and task switching situations. Acta Psychologica, 140(1), 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torff, B., & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(2), 379–383. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia. (2009). UVa first year student computer inventory. http://itc.virginia.edu/students/inventory/2009/. Retrieved 15 October 2013.

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Timmermans, T., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & van den Broeck, A. (2008). Does extrinsic goal framing enhance extrinsic goal-oriented individuals’ learning and performance? An experimental test of the match perspective versus self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 387–397. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 883–898. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. K. J., Khoo, A., Liu, W. C., & Divaharan, S. (2008). Passion and intrinsic motivation in digital gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 39–45. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Chye, S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2011). Understanding motivation in internet gaming among Singaporean youth: The role of passion. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1179–1184. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. T. (2010). Have technology and multitasking rewired how students learn? American Educator, 34(2), 23–28. http://www.aft.org/pdfs/americaneducator/summer2010/Willingham.pdf. Retrieved 11 August 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265. doi:10.1037/a0031311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772–775. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F., Slota, S. T., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., et al. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 61–89. doi:10.3102/0034654312436980

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. L. Quint Oga-Baldwin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oga-Baldwin, W. (2015). Supporting the Needs of Twenty-First Century Learners: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. In: Koh, C. (eds) Motivation, Leadership and Curriculum design. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-230-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics