Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to suggest the components of a framework that might help inform the design of student learning for, and in, a networked world. In thinking about how to design student learning within a networked world, we first need to consider broadly the knowledge, skills and dispositions that we want for our young people in order for them to operate with agency in this twenty-first-century world. Then, we need to explore what elements we should take into account when designing learning, specifically in terms of what we know about how young people learn and what engages them in learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
American Library Association. (1989). Presidential committee on information literacy: Final report. Chicago: American Library Association.
Bakia, M., Yang, E., & Mitchell, K. (2008). National educational technology trends study: Local-level data summary. US Department of Education. http://www.edpubs.org. Accessed 21 Oct 2009.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
Bereiter, C. (1995). A dispositional view of transfer. In Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 21–34). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Black, P., McCormick, R., James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Learning how to learn and assessment for learning: A theoretical inquiry. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 119–132.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2003). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington: National Academy.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice. Organizational Science, 2(1), 40–57.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Burn, A., Buckingham, D., Parry, B., & Powell, M. (2010). Minding the gaps: Teachers’ cultures, students’ cultures. In D. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents’ online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, and popular culture (pp. 183–202). New York: Peter Lang.
Candy, P. C. (2004). Linking thinking: Self-directed learning in the digital age. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
Combes, B. (2009a). Digital natives or digital refugees? Why we have failed Gen Y? Paper presented at the 38th Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship: Preparing students for the future, Padua, Italy, 2–4 September.
Combes, B. (2009b). Generation Y: Are they really digital natives or more like digital refugees? Synergy, 7(1), 9.
Cookson, P. W. I. (2009). What would Socrates say? Educational Leadership, 67(1), 8–14.
Cox, M., Abbot, C., Webb, M., Blakely, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2003a). ICT and attainment: A review of the research literature (A report to the DfES No 17). London: British Educational Communication and Technology Agency.
Cox, M., Abbot, C., Webb, M., Blakely, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2003b). ICT and pedagogy: A review of the research literature (A report to the DfES No 18). London: British Educational Communication and Technology Agency.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Delors, J. (1996a). Education: The necessary utopia. In Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Highlights. http://www.unesco.org/delors/delors_e.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2011.
Delors, J. (1996b). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO.
Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451–498.
Gaskill, P. J., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2002). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning: The dynamic duo in school performance. In J. M. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 185–206). San Diego: Academic.
Gee, J. P. (1997). Thinking, learning and reading: The situated sociocultural mind. In D. Krishner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives (pp. 235–259). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gilbert, J. (2007). Knowledge, the disciplines and learning in the digital age. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6(2), 115–122.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learning. Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 19–33.
Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong question. Educational Researcher, 26(5), 5–17.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hayes, D. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers and Education, 49, 385–395.
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520.
Hipkins, R. (2005). Information literacy and student research. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 2, 27–31.
Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. Austin: The New Media Consortium.
Johnson, M., Kazakov, D., & Svehla, M. (2005). ICT in schools 2005. Report prepared for the 2020 Communications Trust. Wellington: BBC Marketing and Social Research.
Ladbrook, J., & Probert, E. (2011). Information skills and critical literacy: Where are our digikids at with online searching and are their teachers helping? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 105–121.
Lenhart, A., Arafeh, A., Smith, A., & MacGill, A. R. (2008). Writing, technology and teens. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between internet- savvy students and their schools. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
McDougall, A., & Jones, A. (2006). Theory and history, questions and methodology: Current and future issues in research into ICT in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(3), 353–360.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
Mehlenbacher, B. (2010). Technology and instruction: Designs for everyday learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Millard, E. (2003). Towards a literacy of fusion: New times, new teaching and learning? Reading, 37(1), 3–8.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2011.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–587.
Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich: Information Age.
Pajares, F., & Vialante, G. (2008). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 158–170). New York: Guildford.
Pearson, M., & Somekh, B. (2006). Learning transformation with technology: A question of sociocultural contexts? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(4), 519–539.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1995). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Englewood Cliffs: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
Project Tomorrow. (2011). The new 3 E’s of education: Enabled, engaged, empowered. How today’s students are leveraging emerging technologies for learning. http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/pdfs/SU10_3EofEducation(Students).pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2012.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary 2003. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2011.
Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.
Schmitz, B; & Wiese, B. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time series analysis of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 64–96.
Schunk, D. H., & Meece, J. (2006). Self-efficacy in development in adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. 5, pp. 71–96). Greenwich: Information Age.
Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistic instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184.
Spires, H. A., Lee, J. K., & Turner, K. A. (2008). Having our say: Middle grade student perspectives on school, technologies, and academic engagement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 497–515.
Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Woolard, J., Graham, S., & Banich, M. (2009). Are adolescents less mature than adults? Minors’ access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty and the alleged APA flip-flop. American Psychologist, 64(7), 583–594.
Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s actions: A theory of human development (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Wan, Z., Fang, Y., & Neufeld, D. (2007). The role of information technology in technology-mediated learning: A review of the past for the future. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18, 183–192.
Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeider (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–41). London: Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ladbrook, J., Parr, J. (2015). Designing Student Learning for a Networked World. In: Koh, C. (eds) Motivation, Leadership and Curriculum design. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-230-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-230-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-229-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-230-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)