Online Legal Risks in Social Media: Lessons from a Few Court Cases in Hong Kong

Conference paper

Abstract

There are two objectives in this research (a) it outlines some online legal risks in social media in Hong Kong and (b) it provides a basis for further discussion and research on online legal risks and/or online behaviours in the explosive growth of social media. The author conducted literature review and basic legal research on online legal risks in social media and examined court cases to illustrate such risks in Hong Kong. In particular, defamation, reasonable care by providers of social media, and criminal liability were reviewed. Limitations of the study are discussed and future directions for research are proposed at the end of the chapter.

Keywords

Legal risks Social media Court cases Hong Kong 

References

  1. Amoroso, D., & Dembla, P. (2009, March 12–14). Music sharing in China: Theoretical foundations. In Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems conference (pp. 175–181). Charleston, South Carolina.Google Scholar
  2. Bhatnagar, A., Misra, S., & Rao, H. R. (2000). On risk, convenience, and Internet shopping behavior. Communications of the ACM, 43(11), 98–105. doi:10.1145/353360.353371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiu, C., Lin, D., & Silverman, A. (2012). China’s social-media boom. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/marketing_sales/chinas_social-media_boom
  5. Crespo, Á. H., del Bosque, I. R., & de los Salmones Sánchez, M. M. G. (2009). The influence of perceived risk on Internet shopping behavior: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Risk Research, 12(2), 259–277. doi:10.1080/13669870802497744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eyrich, N., Padman, M. L., & Sweetser, K. D. (2008). PR practitioners’ use of social media tools and communication technology. Public Relations Review, 34(4), 412–414. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forsythe, S. M., & Shi, B. (2003). Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research, 56, 867–875. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00273-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat – The globalized world in the twenty-first century (Rev. and exp. ed.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Georgescu, M. (2006). Some issues about risk management for e-banking. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=903419
  11. Goh, B. (2009, September 8). Asian social networking sites profit from virtual money. Reuters. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/09/09/us-asia-socialnetworking-idUSTRE58800D20090909
  12. HKSAR v Chan Yau Hei. [2014] HKEC 383. Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  13. John Raymond Luciw v Wolfgang Derler. [2013] HKEC 1206. Court of First Instance of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  14. Kane, G. C., Alavi, M., Labianca, G.(. J.)., & Borgatti, S. P. (2014). What’s different about social media network? A framework and research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 275–304.Google Scholar
  15. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A. R., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media: The use of social media gains a greater foothold in teen life as they embrace the conversational nature of interactive online media. Washington, DC, USA: Pew Internet & American Project. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Teens_Social_Media_Final.pdf.pdf
  17. Li, Z. (2011, August 24). Hong Kong social media use higher than United States. CNN Travel. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://travel.cnn.com/hong-kong/life/hong-kong-social-media-use-higher-united-states-520745
  18. Liao, C., Lin, H.-N., & Liu, Y.-P. (2010). Predicting the use of pirated software: A contingency model integrating perceived risk with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 237–252. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0081-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lim, N. (2003). Consumers’ perceived risk: sources versus consequences. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2(3), 216–228. doi:10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00025-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU Kids Online: final report 2009 (EU Kids Online, Deliverable D6.5). London: EU Kids Online Network. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24372/1/EU%20Kids%20Online%20final%20report%202009%28lsero%29.pdf
  22. Madden, M., & Smith, A. (2010). Reputation management and social media: How people monitor their identity and search for others online. Washington, DC, USA: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Reputation_Management_with_topline.pdf
  23. Mahler, T. (2007, June 13–16). Defining legal risk. In Conference proceedings of “Commercial contracting for strategic advantage – Potentials and prospects” (pp. 10–31). Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.Google Scholar
  24. Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mourtada, R., & Salem, F. (2012). Social media in the Arab world: Influencing societal and cultural change? Arab Social Media Report, 2(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  26. Munnukka, J., & Järvi, P. (2013). Perceived risks and risk management of social media in an organizational context. Electronic Markets (published online: 1 August 2013). doi:10.1007/s12525-013-0138-2.
  27. Oriental Press Group Ltd & Others v Fevaworks Solutions Ltd & Others. [2013] HKEC 1025. Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  28. R v Legare 2009 SCC 56, [2009] 3 SCR 551. Supreme Court of Canada.Google Scholar
  29. Savell, L. (2010). Minimizing the legal risks of using online social networks. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202462946165&slreturn=20131030063802
  30. Schoder, D., & Yin, P. L. (2000). Building firm trust online. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 73–79. doi:10.1145/355112.355127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28–41.Google Scholar
  32. Staksrud, E. (2013). Children in the online world: Risk, regulation, rights. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  33. Vance, K., Howe, W., & Dellavalle, R. P. (2009). Social Internet sites as a source of public health information. Dermatologic Clinics, 27(2), 133–136. doi:10.1016/j.det.2008.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vellido, A., Lisboa, P. J. G., & Meehan, K. (1999). Segmentation of the on-line shopping market using neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 17(4), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiang, Z., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management, 31, 179–188. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Open University of Hong Kong, Barrister (England & Wales)Kwai ChungChina

Personalised recommendations