Advertisement

Inventing Youth Wellbeing

Chapter

Abstract

Calls to address wellbeing are now so commonplace and widespread that they can mean both everything and nothing. Across policy and popular discourses, improving wellbeing is offered as a solution to the myriad issues facing young people today. This chapter explores the invention of youth wellbeing as a concept and a category of concern, noting its ambiguity and changing applications. It introduces a case for defamilarizing the status and truth claims of the construct of youth wellbeing, by exploring its invention as well as its movements and productive effects. Two sets of conceptual resources are outlined for developing this analysis: the first is informed by Somers’ approach to developing an historical sociology of concept formation, and the second is Bacchi’s account of the construction of policy problems. The chapter concludes with an overview of the papers in this volume which, in drawing on a range of approaches and intellectual traditions, take a step back from taken-for-granted assumptions about youth wellbeing and provide provocations to think anew about this category, the problems it addresses and the promises it makes.

Keywords

Defamilarization Historical sociology Policy Problematization Youth wellbeing 

References

  1. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Sydney: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  2. Bacchi, C. (2012). Introducing the “what’s the problem represented to be?” Approach. In A. Bletsas & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges (pp. 21–24). Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dodge, R., Daly, A. P., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. D. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ereaut, G., & Whiting, R. (2008). What do we mean by “wellbeing”? And why might it matter? London: Department for Schools and Families.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. (1996). The concern for truth. In S. Lotringer (Ed.), Foucault live: Interviews, 1961–84 (pp. 455–464). New York: Semiotext.Google Scholar
  6. Goldin, N., Patel, P., & Perry, K. (2014). The global youth wellbeing index. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Manderson, L. (2005). Introduction: The social context of well-being. In L. Manderson (Ed.), Rethinking wellbeing: Essays on health, disability and disadvantage (pp. 1–25). Perth: API Network.Google Scholar
  8. Morrow, V., & Mayall, B. (2009). What is wrong with children’s well-being in the UK? Questions of meaning and measurement. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31(3), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. NLA. (2014). Trove: Digitized Australian newspapers from 1803 to 1954. Canberra: National Library of Australia. http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper.
  10. OECD. (2013). How’s life? 2013: Measuring well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Sointu, E. (2005). The rise of an ideal: Tracing changing discourses of wellbeing. The Sociological Review, 53(2), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Somers, M. (1999). The privatization of citizenship: How to unthink a knowledge culture. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture (pp. 121–161). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Somers, M. (2008). Genealogies of citizenship: Markets, statelessness, and right to have rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. UNICEF. (2013). Child well-being in rich countries: A comparative overview (Innocenti Report Card 11). Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.Google Scholar
  15. Watson, D., Emery, C., & Bayliss, P. (2012). Children’s social and emotional wellbeing in schools: A critical perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  16. WHO. (1948). Constitution of the World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations