Advertisement

Intuitions All Around Us

  • David Hung
  • Lyna
Chapter

Abstract

Cognitive, emotive and social dimensions are intertwined and each is unpacked to understand the respective interrelations. Portes (Annu Rev Sociol 24:1–24, 1998) has used the term ‘social glue’ to describe the process of building social relationships through trust and confidence between persons in a community. Such social glue bridges individual thought and action thereby increasing an athlete’s confidence in embodied action. There is ‘glue’ when individuals learn of similar tensions and struggles that are experienced. In doing so, a theory of learning which interconnects thought, emotion and action is framed. Building from Vygotsky, thought is explored to be not just linked to language but also influenced by the body. An embodied perspective is critical to the Disciplinary Intuitions approach because of how intuitions are understood throughout this book; they are innate modules of the mind – which by themselves are rudimentary and are exercised and developed (only) if and when the individual utilises them as he or she interacts with his or her (physical (including ‘virtual’) and/or social) environment. It is therefore suggested that thought is also mediated by corporeal action and emotion.

Keywords

Social Level Intermental Level Canonical Solution Spontaneous Concept Reactive Ball 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arievitch, I. M., & Haenen, J. P. P. (2005). Connecting sociocultural theory and educational practice: Galperin’s approach. Educational Psychologist, 40(3), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.) (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boekaerts, M. (2003). Toward a model that integrates motivation, affect, and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series, II, 173–189.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cole, M. (2000). Struggling with complexity: The handbook of child psychology at the millennium. Human Development, 43, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Csordas, T. J. (2008). Intersubjectivity and intercorporeality. Subjectivity, 22, 110–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  14. Engestrom, Y. (2006). Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Building activity theory in practices: Toward the next generation (pp. 1–43). Osaka: Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University.Google Scholar
  15. Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jamaludin, A., Kim, M. S., & Hung, D. (2012). Unpacking self socio dialectics in learners’ interactive play. Computers and Education, 59(3), 1009–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A Sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Luria, A. R. (1987). Afterword to the Russian edition. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.) (N. Minick, Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 359–373). New York: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
  20. Marratto, S. L. (2012). The intercorporeal self: Merleau-Ponty on subjectivity. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  21. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  22. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petroski, H. (1994). The evolution of useful things. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  25. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar
  27. Ratey, J. (2001). A user guide to the brain. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  28. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of ideas of a community of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 209–229.Google Scholar
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Development of higher mental functions. In A. N. Leont’ev, A. R. Luria, & A. Smirnol (Eds.), Psychological research in the USSR (Vol. 1, pp. 11–45). Moscow: Progress. (Original work published 1930)Google Scholar
  31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
  32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
  33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.) (N. Minick, Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–288). New York: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
  34. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wertsch, J. V., del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (Eds.). (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Yamazumi, K. (2008). A hybrid activity system as educational innovation. Journal of Education Change, 9, 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case studies research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage. (Original work published 1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office of Education ResearchNational Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Centre for Research in Pedagogy and PracticeNational Institute of Education (NIE)SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations