Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Shifts in the Field of Mathematics Education pp 139–150Cite as

Turning Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Social

Abstract

I will develop and then reflect on two inter-related claims in this chapter. The first is that the sets of concepts that have emerged through research on mathematics knowledge for teaching (MKT), while relatively recent, have nevertheless proliferated. This is not surprising given that as part of educational knowledge, it is part of a horizontal knowledge structure with a relatively weak grammar (Bernstein, Br J Sociol Educ 20(2):157–173, 1999). The second is that a key ‘new’ position producing and produced by this knowledge development is that of mathematics-teacher-educator-researcher working simultaneously as knowledge producer and recontextualiser in the university. A number of questions, about research and practice emerge from the grammar of MKT and the dual, perhaps ambiguous positioning of its agents. This chapter thus offers a story about mathematical knowledge for teaching framed by Steve Lerman’s contributions to the field, and the possibilities evoked for further work.

Keywords

  • Teacher Education
  • Mathematics Education
  • Mathematics Teacher
  • Pedagogic Content Knowledge
  • Mathematical Knowledge

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

We might suggest that the field [of mathematics education research] exhibits a weak grammar, in that we can see a proliferation of new specialised languages, creating new positions within the field.

(Lerman et al. 2002, p. 37)

… [the] privileged position [of mathematics as a field of knowledge] can be seen to place mathematics education in great danger as the research community feels itself free to pursue “internal” issues of teaching and learning mathematics whilst policy makers put pressure on teachers to perform according to their own pedagogical and curricular demands …

(Lerman 2014, p. 13)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 270–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2011). Modelling teaching in mathematics teacher education and the constitution of mathematics for teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 139–160). New York: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., & Patahuddin, S. M. (2012). Recontexualising items that measure mathematical knowledge for teaching into scenario based interviews: An investigation. Journal of Education, 56, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotna, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60(3), 359–381. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-5072-6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J., Hossain, S., Stevenson, M., & Clarke, J. (2014). Mathematics for teaching and deep subject knowledge: Voices of Mathematics Enhancement Course students in England. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 129–148.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2000a). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). Westport: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2000b). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In D. Phillip (Ed.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, constructivism in education (pp. 193–224). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., Bass, H., & Hill, H. (2004). Knowing and using mathematical knowledge in teaching: Learning what matters. In A. Buffler & R. C. Laugksch (Eds.), Proceeding of the 12th annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 51–65). Durban: SAARSMTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (2nd ed.). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (2011). Mathematics teachers’ subtle, complex disciplinary knowledge. Science, 332(6037), 1506–1507. doi:10.1126/science.1193541.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Graven, M. (2002). Mathematics teacher learning, communities of practice, and the centrality of confidence. PhD, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Ball, D., Sleep, L., & Lewis, J. (2007a). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts? In F. Lester (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 111–155). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Dean, C., & Goffney, I. (2007b). Assessing elemental and structural validity: Data from teachers, non-teachers, and mathematicians. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 5(2–3), 81–92. doi:10.1080/15366360701486999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Blunk, M., Charalambos, Y., Lewis, J., Phelps, G., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430–511.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huillet, D., Adler, J., & Berger, M. (2011). Teachers as researchers: Placing mathematics at the core. Education as Change, 15(1), 17–32. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2011.580769

  • Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1993). Talking science: Language learning and values. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S. (2006). Theories of mathematics education: Is plurality a problem? Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(1), 8–13. doi:10.1007/bf02655902.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S. (2014). Mapping the effects of policy on mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S., Xu, G., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2002). Developing theories of mathematics education research: The ESM story. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1–2), 23–40. doi:10.1023/a:1022412318413.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K., & Muller, J. (2007). A sociology for the transmission of knowledges. In F. Christie & J. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 14–33). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. (2009). The specialisation of pecgogic identities in initial mathematics teacher education in post-apartheid South Africa. PhD, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., & Adler, J. (2005). Constraint or catalyst: The regulation of teacher education in South Africa. Journal of Education, 36, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., & Adler, J. (2014). Sociological tools in the study of knowledge and practice in mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255–281. doi:10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper forms part of the work of the Wits Maths Connect Project at the University of the Witwatersrand, supported by the FirstRand Foundation Mathematics Education Chairs Initiative of the First Rand Foundation the Department of Science and Technology and the National Research Foundation (NRF). Any opinion, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the FRF, DST, or NRF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Jill Adler

Authors
  1. Jill Adler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Adler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nottingham School of Education, Nottingham, United Kingdom

    Peter Gates

  2. Faculty of Education, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, Queensland, Australia

    Robyn Jorgensen (Zevenbergen)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adler, J. (2015). Turning Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Social. In: Gates, P., Jorgensen (Zevenbergen), R. (eds) Shifts in the Field of Mathematics Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-179-4_10

Download citation

search

Navigation