Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Coopetition for Regional Competitiveness pp 47–59Cite as

Academe-Industry-Government (A-I-G) Towards Regional Competitiveness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 609 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

As the roles of knowledge economy , regional competitiveness and academe were explored in the previous chapters, this chapter examines concepts, dynamics and cooperation among academe-industry-government (A-I-G) to enhance regional competitiveness through cases in different regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sabato and Botana (1968) developed a single model to describe the importance of enterprise-university relationship for economic development, which became known as the “Sabato Triangle”.

References

  • Audretsch, D.B. (1995). Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, S., Healey, P., Rip, A., & Ziman, J. (2010). The research system in transition. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, M. and Fracasso, E. (2000). “Sabato’s triangle and triple helix: Expressions of the same concept?,” The Endless Transition: Book of Abstracts: Third Triple Helix International Conference. Rio de Janeiro: COPPE (Graduate School and Research in Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2000). The second academic revolution: MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science. London: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and Zhou, C. (2003). “Regional Innovation Initiator: The Entrepreneurial University in Various Triple Helix Models,” Singapore Triple Helix VI Conference Theme Paper. Available at: http://www.nus.edu.sg/nec/TripleHelix6/SingaporeConferenceThemePaper050107.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., et al. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 19, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. London, UK: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national system and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable GUIRR. (1998). National Science and Technology Strategies in a Global Context. Report of an International Symposium. Washington D.C: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intarakumnerd, P. and Chairatana, P. (2003). “Shifting S&T Policy Paradigm: An Experience of an RTO in Thailand.” Available at: http://www.sinal.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/globelics/pdfs/GLOBELICS_0025_ PI_PAC.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello, J., Neto, J., and Souza, F, (1998). Management of Technological Diffusion: A Case Study in Brazilian Technological Institute. Paper Presented at IAMOT, seventh International Conference on Management of Technology. Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLane, S. (1996). Should universities imitate industry? American Scientist, 84(6), 520–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, B, Webster, A., and Charles, D. (1999). “Making Sense of Diversity and Reluctance,” Research Policy, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, B., & Webster, A. (1998). Links between Universities and their Spin-Offs. Industry and Higher Education, 12(6), 332–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, J.A., & Botana, N. (1968). Science and technology in the future development of Latin America. Revista de la Integracion (3), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, D. (2006). “The Potential to Upgrade the Thai Innovation System by University-Industry Linkages,” Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol. 14(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, A., & Rappert, B. (1997). Regimes of ordering: The commercialization of intellectual property in industrial-academic collaborations. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 9, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (1994). Prometheus bound: science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Jomphong Mongkhonvanit

Authors
  1. Jomphong Mongkhonvanit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jomphong Mongkhonvanit .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mongkhonvanit, J. (2014). Academe-Industry-Government (A-I-G) Towards Regional Competitiveness. In: Coopetition for Regional Competitiveness. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-149-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation