Language as a Bridge Connecting Formal and Informal Language Learning Through Mobile Devices



Informal learning plays an important role in language learning and mobile device ownership fuels its growth, thanks to the availability of educational apps, massive scale services delivered by network operators and emerging designs for situated learning in authentic communication contexts beyond the traditional classroom. This chapter shows how connections between formal and informal language learning may be made through the use of mobile technologies and explores the mutual influence of these spheres, with particular reference to the role of language. Language is the focus of learning but also the means by which learning happens, which gives it a unique mediating and facilitative role. The potential for conversational language to act as a new bridge between formal and informal settings is explored. Motivations for language learning are changing and they will have an influence over what types of learning appeal to new generations of language learners of all ages. Faced with an abundance of resources on the Internet and on their mobile phones, learners will often look for more structured environments and some degree of guidance. The opportunity is there to create learning environments and designs that incorporate the effective use of mobile technologies but that also consider how new social contexts influence the language that is being used and learnt. An example of this is described with reference to the MASELTOV project which is creating innovative context-aware smartphone services for migrants and provides a fertile ground for imagining the future of language learning.


Mobile Device Foreign Language Language Learning Mobile Technology Informal Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ACTFL. (2006). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century (3rd ed.). American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
  2. Adkins, S. S. (2012, April). The worldwide market for digital English language learning products and services: 2011–2016 forecast and analysis. Ambient Insight Premium Report.
  3. Arrigo, M., Di Giuseppe, O., Fulantelli, G., Gentile, M., Merlo, G., Seta, L., & Taibi, D. (Eds.). (2010). MOTILL mobile technologies in lifelong learning: Best practices. Palermo: Italian National Research Council - Institute for Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  4. Butow, P. N., Lobb, E., Jefford, M., Goldstein, D., Eisenbruch, M., Girgis, A., King, M., Sze, M., Aldridge, L., & Schofield, P. (2012). A bridge between cultures: Interpreters’ perspectives of consultations with migrant oncology patients. Support Care Cancer, 20(2), 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, J., Pachler, N., & Bradley, C. (2008). Bridging the gap? Mobile phones at the interface between informal and formal learning. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 4(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  6. Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Demouy, V., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: Using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 25(3), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Díaz-Vera, J. E. (Ed.). (2012). Left to my own devices: Learner autonomy and mobile assisted language learning (Innovation and Leadership in English Language Teaching, 6). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  11. Duff, P. A. (2008, January 14–17). Foreign language policies, research and educational possibilities. In APEC education symposium, Xi’an, China.
  12. Elliott, A. (2010, November 8). Mobile lives, digital emotions. Paper presented at the Birkbeck Institute for Social Research. Backdoor Broadcasting Company Archive. Retrieved from:
  13. European Commission. (2010). Education and training for social inclusion: European success stories. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from:
  14. European Commission. (2012). Commission staff working document – Language competences for employability, mobility and growth. Retrieved from:
  15. Fernández-López, A., Rodríguez-Fórtiz, M. J., Rodríguez-Almendros, M. L., & Martínez-Segura, M. J. (2013). Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support students with special education needs. Computers & Education, 61(February), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fortunati, L. (2002). The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication & Society, 5(4), 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  18. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  19. Gardner, D., & Miller, L. (Eds.). (1994). Directions in self-access language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gaved, M., Jones, A., Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Scanlon, E. (2012). A citizen-centred approach to education in the smart city: Incidental language learning for supporting the inclusion of recent migrants. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 3(4), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language research (pp. 349–381). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Incidental learning in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenning, M.-M. (2007). ICT and language learning: From print to the mobile phone. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerka, S. (2000). Incidental learning: Trends and issues: Alert No. 18. = ED446234
  26. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). Charting unknown territory: Models of participation in mobile language learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 4(2), 116–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Language learning defined by time and place: A framework for next generation designs. In J. E. Diaz-Vera (Ed.), Left to my own devices: Learner autonomy and mobile assisted language learning (pp. 1–13). Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  28. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & de los Arcos, B. (2011, April 13–15). Triumphs and frustrations of self-motivated language learners using mobile devices. In: The CAL conference 2011 – Learning futures: education, technology & sustainability, Manchester.Google Scholar
  29. Kukulska-Hulme, A., Gaved, M., Brasher, A., Jones, A., Scanlon, E., & Paletta, L. (2012). Designing for inclusion through incidental language learning. In ICT for language learning (5th ed., pp. 15–16). Florence: Pixel.Google Scholar
  30. Little, D. (2004). Autonomy and autonomous learners. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 69–72). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Lowden, K., Hall, S., Elliot, D., & Lewin, J. (2011). Employers’ perceptions of the employability skills of new graduates. Research commissioned by the Edge Foundation. University of Glasgow, The SCRE Centre.
  32. Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Macaro, E. (1997). Target language, collaborative learning and autonomy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  34. Mondada, L. (2012). The dynamics of embodied participation and language choice in multilingual meetings. Language in Society, 41(2), 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neumann, L., & Matas, J. (2012). Real-time scene text localization and recognition. In Proceedings of IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2012) (pp. 3538–3545).Google Scholar
  36. Palalas, A. (2012). Design guidelines for a mobile-enabled language learning system supporting the development of ESP listening skills. Doctoral dissertation, Athabasca University.Google Scholar
  37. Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 78–102.Google Scholar
  38. Petersen, S. A., Markiewicz, J.-K., & Bjørnebekk, S. S. (2009). Personalized and contextualized language learning: Choose when, where and what. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petersen, S., Procter-Legg, E., Cacchione, A., Fominykh, M., & Divitini, M. (2012). Creativity and mobile language learning. Presentation at MLCW EC-TEL 2012.
  40. Ros, A. (Ed.). (2012). Social and cultural needs. MASELTOV Deliverable D2.2.1. Retrieved from:
  41. Schwarz, R. L. (1997). Learning disabilities and foreign language learning. Online article.
  42. Shao, Y., Crook, C., & Koleva, B. (2007). Designing a mobile group blog to support cultural learning. In Proceedings of mLearn’07 (pp. 223–226), Melbourne. Retrieved from:
  43. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In C. Haythornthwaite & R. Andrews (Eds.), The Sage handbook of elearning research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, L., & Clayton, B. (2009). Recognising non-formal and informal learning: Participant insights and perspectives. A National Vocational Education and Training Research and Evaluation Program Report. Australian Government, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, R., Gray, J., Freeman, D., Wanjira Kiai, A., Tanaka, M, & Banegas, D. (2013). Report on a symposium on ELT coursebooks: Past, present and possible. In: T. Pattison (Ed.), IATEFL 2012 glasgow conference selections (pp. 74–77). Canterbury: IATEFL.Google Scholar
  46. Tammelin-Laine, T., Nieminen, L., & Martin, M. (2013). Editorial – Special issue on second language and literacy acquisition of low-educated adult immigrants. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 7(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  47. Tinsley, T. (2013). Languages: The state of the nation: Demand and supply of language skills. British Academy report.
  48. UNESCO. (2013). Policy guidelines for mobile learning.
  49. Wells, G. (1999). Language and education: Reconceptualizing education as dialogue. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wong, L.-H. (2012). A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E19–E23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang, W. (2012). Latching/rush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions in retrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation: Findings from Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes, 49(3–4), 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning Technology and Communication, Institute of Educational TechnologyThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations