Skip to main content

Enhancing Students’ Learning of Factual Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Using Blended Learning

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

Factual knowledge is one of the most common types of knowledge that students are expected to learn. Factual knowledge may be described as the basic information about a particular subject or discipline that students must be acquainted with. This may include the terminology and the specific details or elements of a subject (Anderson and Krathwohl in A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. Longman, New York, 2001). Acquiring factual knowledge is important to students because it serves as basic building blocks to understand the larger relationships among important information that define a subject. This chapter reports two recent empirical studies that examined the effect of using blended learning approaches on the learning of a particular factual knowledge—English vocabulary. The first study (Jung and Lee in Multimedia Assist Lang Learn 16(4):67–96, 2013) employed a one-group pre- and post-test design to investigate the impact of a blended learning approach that utilized Internet video clips on 21 Korean students’ vocabulary development. Overall, students showed a significant increase in test scores. The second study (Jia et al. Comput Educ, 58:63–76, 2012) employed a quasi-experiment design to study the effects of a blended learning approach utilizing individualized vocabulary review and assessment in Moodle on 47 Chinese students’ vocabulary knowledge. The results from an independent t-test revealed that students who used the blended learning approach performed significantly better in vocabulary tests compared to the control class which did not use the approach. We summarize the main lessons learned by cross comparing the key pedagogical and instructional strategies used in the two studies, and present these in the Conclusion section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggam, J. (2001). Defining knowledge: An epistemological foundation for knowledge management. Paper presented at the 34th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clariana, R. B., & Lee, D. (2001). The effects of recognition and recall study tasks with feedback in a computer based vocabulary lesson. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. Boston: MA Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, J., Chen, Y., Ding, Z., & Ruan, M. (2012). Effects of a vocabulary acquisition and assessment system on students’ performance in a blended learning class for English subject. Computers and Education, 58, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, R., & Lee, C. H. (2013). Using Internet video clips for university students’ vocabulary development in blended learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 16(4), 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Mason, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P. M. (1992). EFL vocabulary tests. Swansea: Centre for Applied Language Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paribakht, S. T., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In J. Coady & T. N. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174–200). New York: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. A. L. (2005). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khe Foon Hew .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S. (2014). Enhancing Students’ Learning of Factual Knowledge. In: Using Blended Learning. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-089-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics