Skip to main content

Ecological Conceptualization of Halal-Haram Divide

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1425 Accesses

Abstract

Halal and haram are evaluative concepts that refer to what is permissible or impermissible, respectively, in Islamic law. When applied to minerals, plants, or animals, the duo refers to what is permissible or impermissible to consume therein. There has been upsurge in the production and proliferation of halal products which enormously serves the Muslim religious as well as economic interests. However, in a world of market-driven economy when market profit often clashes with the environmental interests and safety, there is a need to address halal and haram within a broader ecological framework. In attempt to proffer an alternative modality of appreciating nature and its biodiversity, this study explores symbiotic relations in nature and subsume halal-haram divide under two Qur’anic ecological keywords of rizq (sustenance) and haqq (truth). The study reveals that, ecologically conceptualized, haram things are simply haram for humans to consume or to make a direct contact with, but not necessarily haram for other nature’s constituents upon which human existence and sustenance depend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abu-Sway, M. (1998). Towards an Islamic jurisprudence of the environment (Fiqh al-Bi’ah fil-Islam). Retrieved April 15, 2013, from http://wise.fau.edu/~mabusway/Islam_and_Environment.pdf

  2. Adams, I. A. (2011). Globalization: Explaining the dynamics and challenges of the halal food surge. Intellectual Discourse, 19(1), 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Ghazali, A. H. (1987). Al-halal wa-al-haram. Beirut: Dar al-Jil.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1995). The lawful and the prohibited in Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Sha’rawi, M. M. (1991). Al-halal wa-al-haram. Cairo: Mu’assasat Akhbar al-Yawm.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Shirazi, A. A. (1985). Al-luma’ fi usul al-fIqh. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baqader, A. A., El-Sabbagh, A. T. E., Al-Glayand, M. A., & Samarrai, M. Y. I. (1994). Environmental protection in Islam (IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 20 Rev). Gland: IUCN World Conservation Union.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Black, R. (2011, August 23). Species count put at 8.7 million. BBC News Science and Environment. Retrieved October 17, 2012, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14616161

  9. Buj Buj, A. (1995). International experimentation and control of the locust plague: Africa in the first half of the 20th century. Nature et environnement, Vol. 3, Les sciences hors d’Occident au XXe siècle, París (ORSTOM Éd., pp. 93–105). Retrieved April 16, 2013, from http://www.ub.edu/geocrit/sv-31.htm

  10. Emon, A. M. (2010). Islamic natural law theories. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang, J. (2010). Ecology: A world without mosquitoes. Nature, 466, 432–434. Retrieved October 11, 2012, from http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100721/full/466432a.html

  12. Foltz, R. C. (2003). Bibliography on Islam and ecology. In R. C. Foltz, F. M. Denny, B. Azizan, et al. (Eds.), Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust (pp. 537–547). Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Foltz, R. C. (2003). Islamic environmentalism: A matter of interpretation. In R. C. Foltz, F. M. Denny, B. Azizan, et al. (Eds.), Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust (pp. 249–279). Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foltz, R. C., Denny, F. M., Baharuddin, A., et al. (Eds.). (2003). Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust (pp. 121–154). Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Global Halal Food Market. (2011, May). Ottawa: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Retrieved April 18, 2013, from http://www.ats-sea.agr.gc.ca/inter/4352-eng.htm

  16. Jawhari, T. (1930). Al-jawahir fi tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kormondy, E. J. (1996). Concepts of ecology (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krebs, C. (2008). The ecological world view. Carolina: University of Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Locusts in Egypt. (1930, April 9). Barrier miner. Broken Hill: 1888–1954, p. 2. Retrieved April 17, 2013, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-page3262025

  20. Lundquist, M., Kramer, L., & Liu, D. (2012). Mosquito reference manual. Chevy Chase, MD: Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Retrieved October 8, 2012, from http://www.hhmi.org/biointeractive/activities/mosquito/mosquito_reference_manual.pdf

  21. Manzoor, P. (1985). Islam and the challenge of ecology. Afkar Inquiry: Magazine of Events and Ideas, 2(2), 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nasr, S. H. (1990). Islam and environmental crisis. MAAS Journal of Islamic Science, 6(2), 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nomanul Haq, S. (2003). Islam and ecology: Toward retrieval and reconstruction. In R. C. Foltz, F. M. Denny, B. Azizan, et al. (Eds.), Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust (pp. 121–154). Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Özdemir, I. (2003). Toward an understanding of environmental ethics from a Qur’anic perspective. In R. C. Foltz, F. M. Denny, B. Azizan, et al. (Eds.), Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust (pp. 3–29). Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rahman, F. (1999). Major themes of the Qur’an. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  26. World Health Organization. (2012). Mosquito wars. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. Retrieved October 12, 2012, from http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/3/09-020309/en/index.html

  27. Zimmer, C. (2011, August 23). How many species? A study says 8.7 million, but it’s tricky. New York Times. Retrieved October 17, 2012, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/30/science/30species.html?_r=0

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul Kabir Hussain Solihu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Solihu, A.K.H. (2014). Ecological Conceptualization of Halal-Haram Divide. In: Kasim, A., Wan Omar, W., Abdul Razak, N., Wahidah Musa, N., Ab. Halim, R., Mohamed, S. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (ICSTSS) 2012. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-077-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics