Skip to main content

Research Methodology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lean Construction Management
  • 9834 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explains the choice of research methodology for this study. It begins with an overview of the general approach and methods used in the research. As the focus of the research is on investigating Toyota Way-styled practices within large Chinese construction firms, the methods commonly applied to lean construction studies are discussed. The choice of the mixed research method is justified as an appropriate research strategy. The determination of the study sample and the techniques of data collection are also described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Beijing VENCI has partnered with the CIOB (Chartered Institute of Building) China to set up the VENCI-CIOB learning centre for Chinese building professionals.

References

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2003). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, J. E., Krewedl, M., Balonick, J., Stewart, T., & Won, S. (2004). Application of lean manufacturing principles to construction. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolen, T., & Hacker, M. (2005). A review of Lean assessment in organizations: An exploratory study of lean practices by electronic manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 24(1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellows, R., & Liu, A. M. M. (2008). Research methods for construction (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, R. R., & McWatters, C. S. (2001). The production performance benefits from JIT implementation. Journal of Operations Management, 19(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowicz, A. D. (2000). Business research project (3rd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, E., & Walter, L. (2007). Lean construction: Prospects for the German construction industry. Lean Construction Journal, 3(1), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P., & Harris, D. (2002). Qualitative and quantitative issues in research design. In D. Partington (Ed.), Essential skills for management research (pp. 99–116). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. (2006). Strategic analysis of large local construction companies in China. Unpublished PhD thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. Y. (2002). Exploratory study of lean consruction: Assessment of lean implementation. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenke, K. (2008). Qualitative research in the study of leadership. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, J. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K., & Meier, D. (2006). The Toyota way field book: A practical guide for implementing Toyota’s 4Ps. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. W., Shen, Q. P., Li, H., & Shen, L. Y. (2004). Factors constraining the development of professional project management in China’s construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 22(3), 203–211.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Naoum, S. G. (2007). Dissertation research and writing for construction students (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC). (2003). China statistic yearbook 2003. Beijing: China Statistic. Available at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/. Accessed March 2, 2009.

  • O’Keefe, R. M., Balci, O., & Smith, E. P. (1986). Validation of expert system performance. Working paper (TR 86–37), Virginia Tech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizzolo, R. (1998). Applying the lessons learned from 27 lean manufacturers: The relevance of relationships management. International Journal Production Economics, 55(3), 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem, O., Solomon, J., Genaidy, A., & Mihkarah, I. (2006). Lean construction: From theory to implementation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 22(4), 168–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, A. (1999). Application of fow principles in the production management of construction sites. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Salford, Salford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Valmohammadi, C. (2011). The impact of TQM implementation on the organizational performance of Iranian manufacturing SMEs. The TQM Journal, 23(5), 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(2), 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (2000). Dissertation skills for business and management students. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. E., Pearson, J. N., & Wilson, J. R. (1999). JIT manufacturing: A survey of implementation in small and large U.S. manufacturers. Management Science, 45(1), 1–15.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2006). Case study methods. In L. G. Judith, C. Gregory, & B. E. Patricia (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A., & Dan, G. (2007). Implementation of TQM in China and organizational performance: An empirical investigation. Total Quality Management, 18(5), 509–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. H., Waszink, A., & Wijngaard, J. (2000). An instrument for measuring TQM implementation for Chinese manufacturing companies. International Journal of Quality and Reliability, 17(7), 730–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gao, S., Low, S.P. (2014). Research Methodology. In: Lean Construction Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-014-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-014-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-013-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-014-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics