Abstract
The digital transformation of higher education, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has led to much greater use of digital learning resources, including digital texts, images, videos, interactive programmes, quizzes and so on. While the digitalisation of the publishing industry and the rise of new media businesses are well-documented, questions of who now produces digital education resources and who pays for them have been largely overlooked. This chapter examines the ways in which new business models are shaping universities’ and students’ access to educational content, distinguishing between content paid for by students, content paid for by universities and open access content whose production is sponsored by a wide range of organisations with diverse motivations. Traditional academic publishers, slow to respond to the shift to digital learning platforms, now find themselves in fierce competition with edutech firms, media companies, individual online content producers, governments and non-government organisations. The chapter concludes by observing that the proliferation of digital educational content requires academics to more often and more actively select appropriate content from a rapidly growing smorgasbord of options provided across multiple platforms, by thousands of producers, of variable quality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altbach, P. G. (1981). The University as Centre and Periphery. Teachers College Record, 82(4), 601–621.
Annand, D., & Jensen, T. (2017). Incentivizing the Production and Use of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education Institutions. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3009
Baas, M., Admiraal, W., & van den Berg, E. (2019). Teachers’ Adoption of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.510
Barrett, B. (2019). The Radical Transformation of the Textbook. Wired, April 2019. https://www.wired.com/story/digital-textbooks-radical-transformation/
Castro, B., MarĂa, L., Arias, J. A. T., Serna, M. D. A., Bedoya, J. W. B., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors. NLM (Medline). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291
Cunningham, S., Ryan, Y., Stedman, L., Tapsall, S., Bagdon, K., Flew, T., & Coaldrake, P. (2000). The Business of Borderless Education. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Canberra. http://www.detya.gov.au/highered/eippubs/eip00_3/bbe.pdf
Cunningham, S., Tapsall, S., Ryan, Y., Stedman, L., Bagdon, K., & Flew, T. (1997). New Media and Borderless Education: A Review of the Convergence Between Global Media Networks and Higher Education Provision. Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Canberra. http://www.deetya.gov.au/archive/highered/eippubs/eip97-22/eip9722.pdf
Devaney, J., Shimshon, G., Rascoff, M., & Maggioncalda, J. (2020). Higher Ed Needs a Long-Term Plan for Virtual Learning Higher Ed Needs a Long-Term Plan for Virtual Learning. Harvard Business Review, May, 5, 2–6.
Educause. (2014). 7 Things You Should Know About: Competency-Based Education. Boulder. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2014/2/7-things-you-should-know-about-competencybased-education
Lau, K. H., Tri, L., Booi, H. K., Mathews, N., Richardson, J., & Thomas, S. (2018). The Role of Textbook Learning Resources in E-Learning: A Taxonomic Study. Computers and Education, 118(March), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.005
Liber, O. (2005). Learning Objects: Conditions for Viability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(5), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00143.x
OECD. (2009). Beyond Textbooks: Digital Learning Resources as Systematic Innovation in the Nordic Countries. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/beyond-textbooks_9789264067813-en
Oliver, B. (2019). Making Micro-Credentials Work for Learners, Employers and Providers. Deakin University. Deakin University.
UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the Impact of Open Courseware for Higher Education in Developing Countries Final report. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000128515
UNESCO. (2019a). Draft Recommendation on Open Educational Resources: 40th General Conference. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-educational-resources-oer
UNESCO. (2019b). Understanding the Impact of OER: Achievements and Challenges. UNESCO. https://iite.unesco.org/publications/understanding-the-impact-of-oer-achievements-and-challenges/
Valdiviezo, A. D., & Crawford, M. (2020). Fostering Soft-Skills Development Through Learning Experience Platforms (LXPs). In S. Allen, K. Gower, & D. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of Teaching with Technology in Management, Leadership, and Business (pp. 312–321). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901658.00040
Ziguras, C. (2018). Will Global Online Education Ever Take Off?, Chronicle of Higher Education, January.
Zimmerman, J. (2020). The Amateur Hour: A History of College Teaching in America. The Amateur Hour. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ziguras, C. (2023). The Political Economy of Digital Educational Content and the Transformation of Learning and Teaching in Global Higher Education. In: Kath, E., Lee, J.C.H., Warren, A. (eds) The Digital Global Condition. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9980-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9980-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9979-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9980-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)