Abstract
The overarching purpose of this research is to critically evaluate the evolving interaction between governmental policies and processes in the implementation of Assistive Technology (AT) for inclusive education. The authors primarily assess the teachers’ knowledge and skills to employ inclusive pedagogy, specifically through the use of AT in inclusive classrooms. This study employs quantitative analysis to investigate the knowledge and skills of teachers in inclusive classrooms. Data were collected from 200 teachers across India. Partial least squares (PLS)—Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the proposed hypotheses. Specifically, it examined the parameters such as, teachers’ knowledge on foundation (TWF), strategies to teach AT to students (STR), student assessment using technology (SAT), professional and ethical practice of technology (PEP) as well as learning environment and social interaction (LSI).TWF, STR and LSI have a strong and direct impact on SAT. STR has a direct impact on PEP. However, TWF and LSI do not predict PEP. The results indicate a lack/inadequacy in knowledge and skills of Indian teachers to employ AT in inclusive classrooms. This study is the first attempt to quantitatively assess teacher’s knowledge and skills for the use of AT in an inclusive-Indian-classrooms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmad FK (2015) Use of assistive technology in inclusive education: making room for diverse learning needs. Transcience 6(2):62–77
Amaltas (2020) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5ed6321bd3bf7f4606f1e15b/DFID-AT_Report.pdf, last accessed 25/8/2022
Atanga C, Jones BA, Krueger LE, Lu S (2020) Teachers of students with learning disabilities: assistive technology knowledge, perceptions, interests, and barriers. J Spec Educ Technol 35(4):236–248
Bangel NJ, Moon SM, Capobianco BM (2010) Preservice teachers’ perceptions and experiences in a gifted education training model. Gifted Child Quart 54(3):209–221
Bausch ME, Ault MJ (2012) Status of assistive technology instruction in university personnel preparation programs. Assistive Tech Outcomes Benefits 8(1):1–14
Chakraborti-Ghosh S (2017) Inclusive education in India: a developmental milestone from segregation to inclusion. J Education Syst 1(1):53–62
Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods Business Res 295(2):295–336
Edyburn DL, Rao K, Hariharan P (2017) Technological practices supporting diverse students in inclusive settings. In: The Wiley handbook of diversity in special education, 357
Falk RF, Miller NB (1992) A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press
Finkelstein S, Sharma U, Furlonger B (2021) The inclusive practices of classroom teachers: a scoping review and thematic analysis. Int J Incl Educ 25(6):735–762
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Babin BJ, Black WC (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, 7th edn. Pearson Upper Saddle River
Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg Manag J 20(2):195–204
Lahm EA (2003) Assistive technology specialists: Bringing knowledge of assistive technology to school districts. Remedial Spec Educ 24(3):141–153
Lersilp S, Putthinoi S, Lersilp T (2018) Facilitators and barriers of assistive technology and learning environment for children with special needs. Occupational Therapy Int
Matter R, Harniss M, Oderud T, Borg J, Eide AH (2017) Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 12(2):105–114
Powell W, Kusuma-Powell O (2011) How to teach now: five keys to personalized learning in the global classroom. Ascd.
Rao P, Shrivastava S, Sarkar T (2020) Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy. https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/InclusiveEducationReport_final_28April_0527PM-1.pdf last accessed 25/8/2022
Sharma U, Das A (2015) Inclusive education in India: past, present and future. Support Learn 30(1):55–68
Tiwari S, John J (2017) Special educators’ knowledge and training on autism in Karnataka: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Psych 59(3):359
Tuli U (2019) Inclusive education in India: from concept to reality. Learning Curve 5:86–91
University of Kentucky Assistive Technology (UKAT) Project (2002) UKAT toolkit instructions. University of Kentucky Assistive Technology (UKAT) Toolkit, University of Kentucky and Kentucky Public Schools, 1–11
Willems J, Farley H, Campbell C (2019) The increasing significance of digital equity in higher education: an introduction to the digital equity special issue. Australasian J Educ Techn 35(6):1–8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saha, S., Mallya, D. (2023). Inclusion, Assistive-Technology and Teacher-Preparedness: Empirical Evidence from India. In: Goar, V., Kuri, M., Kumar, R., Senjyu, T. (eds) Advances in Information Communication Technology and Computing. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 628. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9888-1_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9888-1_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9887-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9888-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)