Abstract
At present, many AI models are used in medical image analysis and disease detection. Coupled with extended understanding of imaging and clinical phenotypes toward a more precision-based approach for managing spine patients, the multidimensionality of data-driven results and analysis become exponentially more complex. However, with the use of AI, ML platforms and efforts of spine surgeons, computer-aided diagnosis and detection, decision support and prognosis prediction, and computer-aided surgical education and assessment models seem to have reduced complications and improved outcomes with MISS. Like all medical specialties, MISS is subjected to changes in clinical practices based on cutting-edge research. Quality control systems should be employed to ensure the algorithms continue to be relevant as data collection and clinical practices change over time. Recent studies clearly demonstrate the power of AI, ML in pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases of spinal surgeries. Future work requires the integration of AI and ML models to combine pre-, intra-, and postoperative algorithms into a single model where the best preoperative planning, intraoperative surgical intervention, and postoperative follow-up work with associated risk, financial cost, and considerations can be suggested to surgeons. Such algorithms not only can benefit spine surgeons in their decision-making but also facilitate the delivery of high-quality healthcare to low resources settings and facilitate personalized surgical and postsurgical care with MISS.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Katsuura Y, Colón LF, Perez AA, Albert TJ, Qureshi SA. A primer on the use of artificial intelligence in spine surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2021;34(9):316–21.
Bounds D, Lloyd PJ, Mathew BG, Waddell G. A multilayer perceptron network for the diagnosis of low back pain. IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw. 1988;2:481–9.
Merali ZA, Colak E, Wilson JR. Applications of machine learning to imaging of spinal disorders: current status and future directions. Global. Spine J. 2021;11(1_suppl):23s–9s. 23S
Rodrigues N, dos Reis K, Evans S, McDonnell JM, Ahern DP, Butler JS. Artificial intelligence and the future of spine surgery: a practical supplement to modern spine care? Clin spine Surgery. 2021;34(6):216.
Glissen Brown JR, Berzin TM. Adoption of new technologies: artificial intelligence. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2021;31(4):743–58.
Mehta P, Bukov M, Wang C-H, et al. A high-bias, low-variance introduction to machine learning for physicists. Phys Rep. 2019;810:1–124.
Galbusera F, Casaroli G, Bassani T. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine research. JOR Spine. 2019;2(1):e1044.
McGirt MJ, Sivaganesan A, Asher AL, Devin CJ. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(6):E13.
Belykh E, Krutko AV, Baykov ES, Giers MB, Preul MC, Byvaltsev VA. Preoperative estimation of disc herniation recurrence after microdiscectomy: predictive value of a multivariate model based on radiographic parameters. Spine J. 2017;17(3):390–400.
Pan Y, Chen Q, Chen T, et al. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the cobb angle on chest X-rays. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(12):3035–43.
Lewandrowsk IK, Muraleedharan N, Eddy SA, et al. Feasibility of deep learning algorithms for reporting in routine spine magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(s3):S86–s97.
Yang D, Xiong T, Xu D, et al. Automatic vertebra labeling in large-scale 3D CT using deep image-to-image network with message passing and sparsity regularization. In: International conference on information processing in medical imaging. Cham: Springer; 2017.
Yang HS, Kim KR, Kim S, Park JY. Deep learning application in spinal implant identification. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021;46(5):E318–e24.
Bodenstedt S, Rivoir D, Jenke A, et al. Active learning using deep Bayesian networks for surgical workflow analysis. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019;14:1079–87.
Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. npj Digit Med. 2020;3(1):17.
Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):70–6.
Cui P, Shu T, Lei J, Chen W. Nerve recognition in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy using convolutional neural network. Med Phys. 2021;48(5):2279–88.
Yamada K, Nagahama K, Abe Y, Hyugaji Y, Takahata M, Iwasaki N. Morphological analysis of Kambin's triangle using 3D CT/MRI fusion imaging of lumbar nerve root created automatically with artificial intelligence. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(8):2191–9.
Kim HS, Paudel B, Jang JS. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for all types of lumbar disc Herniations (LDH) including severely difficult and extremely difficult LDH cases. Pain Physician. 2018;21(4):E401–e8.
Fan G, Liu H, Wang D, et al. Deep learning-based lumbosacral reconstruction for difficulty prediction of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy at L5/S1 level: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020;82:162–9.
Azimi P, Mohammadi HR, Benzel EC, Shahzadi S, Azhari S. Use of artificial neural networks to predict recurrent lumbar disk herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(3):E161–5.
Staartjes VE, de Wispelaere MP, Vandertop WP, Schröder ML. Deep learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for patient-reported outcomes following lumbar discectomy: feasibility of center-specific modeling. Spine J. 2019;19(5):853–61.
Kim JS, Merrill RK, Arvind V, Kaji D, et al. Examining the ability of artificial neural networks machine learning models to accurately predict complications following posterior lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(12):853–60.
Lewandrowski KU, Muraleedharan N, Eddy SA, et al. Artificial intelligence comparison of the radiologist report with endoscopic predictors of successful Transforaminal decompression for painful conditions of the lumber spine: application of deep learning algorithm interpretation of routine lumbar magnetic resonance imaging scan. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(s3):S75–s85.
Sonnadara RR, Mui C, McQueen S, et al. Reflections on competency-based education and training for surgical residents. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(1):151–8.
Maier-Hein L, Eisenmann M, Sarikaya D, et al. Surgical data science–from concepts toward clinical translation. Med Image Anal. 2022;76:102306.
Palmisciano P, Jamjoom AAB, Taylor D, Stoyanov D, Marcus HJ. Attitudes of patients and their relatives toward artificial intelligence in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2020;138:e627–e33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yang, H. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. In: Ahn, Y., Park, JK., Park, CK. (eds) Core Techniques of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9849-2_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9849-2_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9848-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9849-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)