Skip to main content

History of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Core Techniques of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Abstract

Reducing the patient’s pain, accelerating recovery, and preventing degenerative changes and instability due to damage to normal tissues have been the concerns of many spine surgeons since the beginning of modern spine surgery. Thanks to the invention of various surgical methods and the development of surgical instruments, current spine surgery makes it possible to treat a wider area of the spine with fewer incisions and minor structural damage. Although at the stage of development of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), some treatments were regarded as treatments lacking evidence or were discontinued due to fatal side effects, spine surgeons did not get frustrated and overcame numerous trials and errors. MISS has reached the position of scientific, well-established, and genuinely patient-friendly treatment that should not be biased against commercial or unscrupulous care. MISS is not opposed to conventional spine surgery but is an advanced surgical technique that pursues the best results for the patient. It is a treatment that minimizes the patient’s damage through technological advances and resolves unnecessary hesitation in the patient’s treatment. As MISS experience has been accumulated, it is now possible to replace many areas of open spine surgery with MISS. MISS has become an essential skill that spine surgeons should have. MISS will lead the future of spine surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Park C-K. Minimally invasive spine surgery in Korea—a neurosurgeon’s view. J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech. 2016;1(1):3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith L. Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus in humans. JAMA. 1964;187:137–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Watts C, Dickhaus E. Chemonucleolysis: a note of caution. Surg Neurol. 1986;26(3):236–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koebbe CJ, Maroon JC, Abla A, El-Kadi H, Bost J. Lumbar microdiscectomy: a historical perspective and current technical considerations. Neurosurg Focus. 2002;13(2):E3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khandge AV, Sharma SB, Kim JS. The evolution of transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2021;145:643–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kambin P, Zhou L. History and current status of percutaneous arthroscopic disc surgery. Spine. 1996;21(24 Suppl):57s–61s.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hijikata S. Percutaneous nucleotomy. A new concept technique and 12 years’ experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;238:9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy. Arthroscopy. 1992;8(3):287–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikeuchi H. The early days of arthroscopic surgery in Japan. Arthroscopy. 1988;4(3):222–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kambin P, Nixon JE, Chait A, Schaffer JL. Annular protrusion: pathophysiology and roentgenographic appearance. Spine. 1988;13(6):671–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schreiber A, Suezawa Y, Leu H. Does percutaneous nucleotomy with discoscopy replace conventional discectomy? Eight years of experience and results in treatment of herniated lumbar disc. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;238:35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leu H, Hauser R. Die perkutan posterolaterale Foraminoskopie: Prinzip, Technik und Erfahrungen seit 1991. Arthroskopie. 1996;6:926–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tieber F, Lewandrowski K-U. Technology advancements in spinal endoscopy for staged management of painful spine conditions. J Spine Surgery. 2019;6:S19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayer HM, Brock M. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. J Neurosurg. 1993;78(2):216–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathews HH. Transforaminal endoscopic microdiscectomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1996;7(1):59–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yeung AT. Minimally invasive disc surgery with the Yeung endoscopic spine system (YESS). Surg Technol Int. 1999;8:267–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schubert M, Hoogland T. Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005;17(6):641–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee S, Kim SK, Lee SH, Kim WJ, Choi WC, Choi G, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM, Lee HY, Shin SW, Kang HY. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine. 2004;29(16):E326–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Shin SW. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: clinical outcome and radiographic changes. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23(4):362–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi G, Lee SH, Lokhande P, Kong BJ, Shim CS, Jung B, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique using rigid working channel endoscope. Spine. 2008;33(15):E508–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G. A New full-endoscopic technique for the interlaminar operation of lumbar disc herniations using 6-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 331 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006;49(2):80–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. A new full-endoscopic technique for cervical posterior foraminotomy in the treatment of lateral disc herniations using 6.9-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 87 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007;50(4):219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Soliman HM. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression. Spine J. 2015;15(10):2282–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hwa Eum J, Hwa Heo D, Son SK, Park CK. Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(4):602–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heo DH, Park CW, Son SK, Eum JH. Unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery. Singapore: Springer; 2022.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim HS, Wu PH, Jang IT. Current and future of endoscopic spine surgery: what are the common procedures we have now and what lies ahead? World Neurosurg. 2020;140:642–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Khoo LT, Fessler RG. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5 Suppl):S146–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Spetzger U, Bertalanffy H, Reinges MH, Gilsbach JM. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: clinical experiences. Acta Neurochir. 1997;139(5):397–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perez-Cruet MJ, Foley KT, Isaacs RE, Rice-Wyllie L, Wellington R, Smith MM, et al. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5 Suppl):S129–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Magerl FP. Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;189:125–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wiesner L, Kothe R, Rüther W. Anatomic evaluation of two different techniques for the percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine. Spine. 1999;24(15):1599–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathews H. Endoscopy assisted percutaneous anterior interbody fusion with subcutaneous suprafascial internal fixation: evolution of technique and surgical considerations. Orthopaedics. 1995;3:496–500.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(Suppl):S1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zucherman JF, Zdeblick TA, Bailey SA, Mahvi D, Hsu KY, Kohrs D. Instrumented laparoscopic spinal fusion. Preliminary results. Spine. 1995;20(18):2029–34; discussion 34–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 1997;22(6):691–9; discussion 700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6(4):435–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Knight RQ, Schwaegler P, Hanscom D, Roh J. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(1):34–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MA, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J. 2009;9(5):366–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bae J, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Bae Y, Jeon SH. Transumbilical retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical note and preliminary case series. Neurospine. 2021;18(2):399–405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jho HD. Endoscopic microscopic transpedicular thoracic discectomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(1):125–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mack MJ, Regan JJ, Bobechko WP, Acuff TE. Application of thoracoscopy for diseases of the spine. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56(3):736–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee S-H, Bae J, Jeon S-H. Minimally invasive thoracic spine surgery. Singapore: Springer; 2021.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Jho HD. Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy: a new approach to cervical disc herniation. J Neurosurg. 1996;84(2):155–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jho HD, Kim MH, Kim WK. Anterior cervical microforaminotomy for spondylotic cervical myelopathy: part 2. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5 Suppl):S54–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, Chae YS, Jung B, Lee S. Modified transcorporeal anterior cervical microforaminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: a technical note and early results. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(9):1387–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Roh SW, Kim DH, Cardoso AC, Fessler RG. Endoscopic foraminotomy using MED system in cadaveric specimens. Spine. 2000;25(2):260–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Choy DS, Ascher PW, Ranu HS, Saddekni S, Alkaitis D, Liebler W, et al. Percutaneous laser disc decompression. A new therapeutic modality. Spine. 1992;17(8):949–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Davis JK. Early experience with laser disc decompression. A percutaneous method. J Fla Med Assoc. 1992;79(1):37–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Onik G, Maroon J, Day A, Helms C. Automated percutaneous discectomy: preliminary experience. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1988;43:58–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Saal JA, Saal JS. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Clin Sports Med. 2002;21(1):167–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lee SH, Kang HS. Percutaneous endoscopic laser annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(3):198–206; discussion e33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D. [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty]. Neuro-Chirurgie. 1987;33 (2):166–8.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jensen ME, Dion JE. Vertebroplasty relieves osteoporosis pain. Diagn Imaging. 1997;19(9):68, 71–2.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26(14):1511–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Kun Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Park, CK., Jeong, SK., Ahn, Y. (2023). History of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. In: Ahn, Y., Park, JK., Park, CK. (eds) Core Techniques of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9849-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9849-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9848-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9849-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics