Abstract
This paper examines auctions in the Kautiliya Arthasastra, the oldest Indian treatise on law, economic activities, and statecraft. It suggests that auctions of land and goods described in the treatise differ from modern auctions insofar as they were designed around the ideal of just prices. It also highlights the differences between auctions of land and goods in terms of the degree of competition allowed by the auction design. It argues that Kautilyan auctions of goods are Pareto-efficient but do not maximize the seller’s profit, whereas auctions of land are neither Pareto-efficient nor maximize the seller’s profit. The paper also discusses the exegetical problems raised by the comparative analysis of the two types of auctions.
We are grateful to Manfred Holler for comments on an earlier draft. The usual disclaimer applies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Cinematic renditions of the popular story of King Harishchandra such as the tele-serial Upanishad Ganga (The Human Goal: Dharma—Story of Raja Harishchandra—Episode 9) include two instances of auctions. However, auctions do not figure in ancient sources of this story such as Vyasa Mahabharata, Markandeya Purana and Devibhagavata and medieval sources such as Raghavanka's Harishchandra Kavya, a 12th Century Kannada text.
- 2.
There is perhaps no pre-modern Indian text that discusses economic activities outside the perimeter of law and statecraft.
- 3.
Soon after it was first translated into English by Shamasastry (1988 [1915]), the Arthasastra won instant recognition as “perhaps the most precious work in the whole of Sanskrit literature” (Thomas, 1922, p. 467) because it possibly “throws more light on the cultural environment and actual life in ancient India than any other work of Indian literature” (Maurice Winternitz quoted in Trautmann, 1971, p. 3; also see McClish, 2019; Olivelle, 2013, p. 39). The Arthasastra’s discovery transformed the ancient Indian from an otherworldly being to a calculative this-worldly being (Gowen, 1929, pp. 174, 178; Trautmann 1971, p. 2; Weber, 1946, pp. 123–124). Since then Kautilya has been equated with Machiavelli. But Kumar (2010, pp. 292–293) argues that popular imagination in India nurtures a complex image of Kautilya, unlike the West where Machiavelli is equated with cunning.
- 4.
The text differentiates between “scholars and practitioners” (I.5.8).
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
The scare quotes are necessary since these markets do not necessarily conform to our contemporary understanding. Consider, for instance, Rosenbaum’s (2000) criteria for identifying markets.
- 9.
Olivelle (2013, p. 555) suggests that “it may be in the interest of a trader to set an artificially high price, from which it could only come down as a result of bidding.” However, the text does not support this reading.
- 10.
In ancient Indian law, shouting/calling out played an important role in a variety of contexts in addition to auctions. For instance, shouting to attract potential rescuers played an important role in ancient Indian law regarding distress contracts (III.13.35, see also Asahaya’s commentary on Naradasmriti, Jolly, 1889, p. 130; Lariviere, 2003, p. 342). Also, shouting to alert others relaxed liabilities of a driver/rider of a cart/animal that has gone out of control (IV.13.14, also Manava Dharmasastra VIII.291–292 (Olivelle, 2006) and Yajnavalkya Dharmasastra II.298–299 [Dutt, 2011]). Manava Dharmasastra (VIII.233) suggests that a herdsman is not guilty if an animal is stolen “despite his shouts”, and IV.13.14, which suggests that one cutting a tree is not guilty of hurting others if he shouts, “get out of the way.” Also see Yajnavalkya Dharmasastra (II.303), Brihaspati (XVI.20), and Naradasmriti (VI.13.16) (Dutt, 2011; Jolly, 1889).
- 11.
- 12.
See Footnote 19 regarding the translation of “(due) price.”
- 13.
Trautmann introduces another condition, namely, witnesses should be knowledgeable. This is not mentioned in the treatise, even though it may be implied.
- 14.
The number forty is also important in other contexts in the Arthasastra, e.g., “for one doing harm to members from forty neighbouring families, the fine shall be 48 panas” (III.20.15, emphasis added). Cities were divided into “unit[s] of ten households, 20 households, or 40 households” (II.36.2, emphasis added). State officials could cheat people in forty different ways (II.8.20–21). The number forty also finds mention in the context of measurement. A nalika, which was a measure of time, consisted of 40 kalas (II.20.34). The denominations of weights manufactured included 40 suvarnas (II.19.8). Also, the “work month for the elephant corps [of the army]” (Rangarajan, 1992, p. 729) or “months for calculating wages of attendants of horses and elephants” (Kangle, 2003 [1972], p. 141) was equal to 40 days and nights (II.21.53). Even otherwise the number forty must have been important insofar as four, five, and eight were units of counting in a variety of contexts (for a compilation of a few usages see Olivelle, 2013, Appendix 2; Rangarajan, 1992, Appendix 1). In medieval India, a particular genre of poetry was known as chālisā, i.e., a collection of forty verses on a specific (mostly devotional) theme (e.g., Hanumān Chālisā, Durgā Chālisā, etc.). The number forty was also important across the world in ancient and medieval times. In the Biblical story of Noah it rained for forty days and nights (Genesis 7:4). Joseph mourned his father’s death for forty days (Genesis 50:1), Moses spent forty days on Mount Sinai (Exod 24:18), and Jesus fasted for forty days and nights (Matt 4:2; Mark 1:13; Luke 4:2). More generally, the number forty is closely associated with life cycle ceremonies across cultures. The widespread importance of the number could possibly be linked to its mathematical properties or astronomical facts of interest to ancient civilizations.
- 15.
The requirement of price announcement thrice reminds of modern English auctions. The number three is also used elsewhere in the Arthasastra where decision under uncertainty is involved, e.g., “when there is agreement in the reports of three (spies), credence (should be given)” (I.12.15), “In case of non-admission [of the claim], however, witnesses shall decide, those who are trustworthy, honest or approved, three at least in number” (III.11.26), and the period of retraction of sale for agricultural produce is “three days” (III.15.5) whereas for “quadrupeds” is “three fortnights… [f]or, it is by that time that purity or otherwise can be known” (III.15.17–18, emphasis added).
- 16.
The number seven is also important in other contexts in the Arthasastra, e.g., sale of “means of livelihood” could be retracted within “seven days” (III.15.6).
- 17.
As in the sutra that says that state officials can cheat people in forty different ways (II.8.20–21). For a discussion on the use of numbers in ancient Sanskrit literature see Doniger and Kakar (2003, pp. xxi–xxv).
- 18.
- 19.
There is no phrase in the Arthasastra that translates exactly as just price (Kumar, 2012). A wide range of closely associated expressions are used in the literature. Different authors use different phrases: “normal price” (Olivelle, 2013, p. 148), “(due) price” (Kangle, 2003 [1972], pp. 142–143), and “proper value” (Shamasastry, 1988 [1915], p. 122). At times even the same author uses several different expressions to capture the intent of the treatise. For instance, Trautmann (2012) uses several different expressions to describe the idea of fairness in transactions involving goods or land: fair (99, 129, 130, 140), true (99, 124, 125, 127), just (112, 124), proper (116, 124, 127), reasonable (129), stable (129), steady (130), customary (112, 124, 127), and commonly accepted (124).
- 20.
- 21.
II.16.4, II.16.11–13, 19, II.21.7–13, II.21.22–23, 31, II.22.8–14, III.9.5.
- 22.
Pana refers to the basic unit of currency—a silver coin, whereas the smallest unit was 1/2 Kakani = 1/128 Pana (II.12.24, Kangle, 2006 [1965], p. 181; Olivelle, 2013, pp. 458–459). The lowest annual salary of employees of the Kautilyan state was 60 panas and the highest legal fine was 1,000 panas. Among goods generally sold in market those priced 2 panas were considered to be high value goods.
References
Akerlof, G. A. (1976). The economics of caste and of the rat race and other woeful tales. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 599–617.
de Roover, R. (1951). Monopoly theory prior to Adam Smith: A revision. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65, 492–524.
Doniger, W., & Kakar, S. (2003). Kamasutra. Oxford University Press.
Doniger, W., & Smith, B. K. (1991). The laws of Manu. Penguin Books.
Doyle, R. A., & Baska, S. (2002, November). History of auctions: From ancient Rome to Todays high-tech auctions. Auctioneer. Available at http://web.archive.org/web/20080517071614/http://auctioneersfoundation.org/news_detail.php?id=5094. Last accessed 20 Mar 2012.
Dutt, M. N. (2011). Yajnavalkya-Smrtih: Text with Commentary Mitaksara of Vijnaneswara and English Translation with Notes (R. K. Panda, Ed.). Bharatiya Kala Prakashan.
Gowen, H. H. (1929). The Indian Machiavelli or political theory in India two thousand years ago. Political Science Quarterly, 44, 173–192.
Jolly, J. (1889). The minor law-books [The Sacred Books of the East, Vol. XXXIII, Part I]. Motilal Banarsidass.
Kangle, R. P. (2003 [1972]). The Kautilīya Arthaśāstra: An English translation with critical and explanatory notes Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Motilal Banarsidass.
Kangle, R. P. (2006 [1965]). The Kautilīya Arthaśāstra: A study Vol. 3 (1st ed.). Motilal Banarsidass.
Kangle, R. P. (2006 [1969]). The Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra: A critical edition with a Glossary Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Motilal Banarsidass.
Klemperer, P. (1999). Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13, 227–286.
Kumar, V. (2010). Strategy in the Kautiliya Arthasastra. Homo Oeconomicus, 27, 289–320.
Kumar, V. (2011). Scheming lovers and their secrets: Strategy-making in the Kamasutra. Homo Oeconomicus, 28, 479–498.
Kumar, V. (2012). Cartels in the Kautiliya Arthasastra. Czech Economic Review, 6, 59–79.
Lariviere, R. W. (2003). Naradasmrti: Critical edition and translation. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Liebermann, Y. (1985). Competition in consumption as viewed by Jewish Law. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 385–393.
Lingat, R. (1973). The classical law of India (translated from the French with additions by J. Duncan, M. Derrett). Thomson Press (India) Limited.
McClish, M. R. (2009). Political Brahmanism and the state: A compositional history of the Arthasastra [Ph.D. Dissertation]. University of Texas at Austin.
McClish, M. R. (2019). The history of the Arthaśāstra: Sovereignty and sacred law in Ancient India. Cambridge University Press.
Olivelle, P. (2006). Manu’s law code: A critical edition and translation of the Mānava-Dharmaśāstra. Oxford University Press.
Olivelle, P. (2013). King, governance, and law in Ancient India: Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra (A new annotated translation). Oxford University Press.
Rangarajan, L. N. (1992). The Arthashastra. Penguin Books.
Raskovich, A. (1996). You shall have no other gods besides me: A legal-economic analysis of the rise of Yahweh. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152, 449–471.
Rocher, L. (1985). The Kāmasūtra: Vātsyāyana’s Attitude toward Dharma and Dharmaśāstra. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 105, 521–529.
Rocher, L. (1993). Law books in an oral culture: The Indian “Dharmaśāstras.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 137, 254–267.
Rosenbaum, E. F. (2000). What is a market? On the methodology of a contested concept. Review of Social Economy, LVIII(4), 455–486.
Scharfe, H. (1993). Investigations in Kautalya’s manual of political science. Harrassowitz Verlag.
Shamasastry, R. (1988 [1915]). Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra (5th ed.). Mysore: Padam Printers.
Shubik, M. (1999). The theory of money and financial institutions (Vol. I). MIT Press.
Sihag, B. S. (2009). Kautilya on law, economics and ethics. Humanomics, 25, 75–94.
Sternbach, L. (1952). Contract of deposit in some non-juridical sources in Classical Sanskrit. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 72, 145–154.
Sternbach, L. (1953). Contract of deposit in some non-juridical sources in Classical Sanskrit (Concluded). Journal of the American Oriental Society, 73, 16–26.
Thomas, F. W. (1922). Chandragupta, the founder of Mauryan Empire. In E. J. Rapson (Ed.), The Cambridge history of India—Vol. I (Ancient India). Cambridge University Press.
Trautmann, T. R. (1971). Kautilya and the Arthashastra: A statistical investigation of the authorship and evolution of the text. E. J. Brill.
Trautmann, T. R. (2012). Arthashastra: The Science of Wealth. New Delhi: Penguin India.
Weber, M. (1946). Essays in sociology (H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Babu, P.G., Kumar, V. (2023). Auctions in Kautilya’s Arthasastra. In: Tiwari, P., Parikh, K. (eds) Axes of Sustainable Development and Growth in India. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9756-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9756-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9755-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9756-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)