Abstract
Tourism and pilgrimage in the twenty-first century have evolved as major drivers of local, regional, and even national economies. Indeed, pilgrimage has long been an important social and economic facet of many communities. Nevertheless, need and desire for pilgrimage generates multi-layered issues of contested spaces and competing uses between different religious persuasions and secular communities. Such issues have occurred throughout the history of pilgrimage and tourism, triggering political and other conflicts. This chapter addresses specific issues of modern tourism, leisure, and pilgrimage with English case-studies and reference to stakeholder perceptions of pagans and non-pagans today.
Perceptions and attitudes are significant forces raising difficult issues when mainstream, mass tourism and outdoor recreation impact on pagan sites and landscapes. When perceived sacred sites become landscapes for outdoor sporting activities, there are potential conflicts. In English National Parks, originally designated in the 1940s and 1950s, priorities were quiet recreation and conservation. However, increasing demand for outdoor active leisure and mass tourism, and regional economic benefits, means a change in basic assumptions. This generates issues of site and space ‘ownership’. Whilst traditional mainstream locations, e.g., medieval Christian churches, are recognised as places of quiet reverence, pagan landscape-based religious sites are not. Additional conflict occurs in now recreational landscapes between secular spiritual visitors to ‘wild’ sites seeking nature-therapy through solitude, and mass tourism or active sports. With National Park management increasingly driven by potential economic impacts, decision-makers overlook these issues and less mainstream stakeholders like modern-day pagans and those seeking spiritual experiences in nature. For pilgrimage and wider tourism, the study triggers questions of whose religion, heritage, landscape, and benefit. Long-term action research in English National Parks and other protected areas suggests these are rarely addressed by mainstream conservation of nature and heritage, by tourism managers, or regional planners.
The chapter reviews issues, long-term observations, and action research with stakeholders, with reference to detailed case-studies and stakeholder feedback to consider paradigms. Specific questions are (1) of ‘ownership’ of space and nature as sacred sites in National Parks and other protected areas in England; (2) of attitudes and connection to nature and landscape by pagan and non-pagan communities; (3) the degree to which connection to nature in English National Parks represents spiritual experience; and (4) how pagan stakeholders in English National Parks represent an invisible community. It is argued that mass tourism destinations, National Parks, and other protected areas creates contested spaces between multiple stakeholder groups with these spiritual landscapes overlooked by managers and decision-makers. The issues and findings are transferrable to other geographical and social settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitchison, C., Macleod, N. E., & Shaw, S. (2000). Leisure and tourism landscapes. Routledge.
Alexander, M. A. (2008). Management planning for nature conservation: A theoretical basis and practical guide. Springer.
Alexander, M. A. (2010). Guide to management planning. CMS Consortium.
Anon. (2009). Peak District landscape character assessment. 8. The eastern moors landscape strategy and action plan. Peak District National Park Authority.
Anon. (2010). Sheffield’s great outdoors green & open space strategy 2010–2030. Parks and Countryside, Sheffield City Council.
Anon. (2012). Conservation plan guidance. Heritage Lottery Fund.
Anon. (2013). Sheffield moors masterplan 2013–2028 revised draftv2 making connections. A landscape scale vision for the Sheffield moors. Sheffield Moors Partnership, Peak District National Park Authority & partners.
Anon. (n.d.-a). Action for habitats. Eastern moors partnership: Peak District National Park. https://www.peakdistrict.gov.uk/looking-after/biodiversity/action-for-wildlife/action-for-habitats. Accessed Feb 2021.
Anon. (n.d.-b). Landscape strategy. https://www.peakdistrict.gov.uk/looking-after/strategies-and-policies/landscape-strategy. Accessed Feb 2021.
Anon. (n.d.-c). World religions or belief systems by number of adherents. http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html. Accessed May 2017.
Anon. (n.d.-d). Forest school association/What is forest school. https://www.forestschoolassociation.org/. Accessed May 2021.
Arvay, C. G. (2018). The biophilia effect: The healing bond between humans and nature: A scientific and spiritual exploration of the healing bond between humans and nature. Sounds True.
Barnatt, J. (1997). Excavation and restoration of the Doll Tor stone circle, Stanton, Derbyshire, 1994. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal, 117, 81–85.
Beard, C., Egan, D., & Rotherham, I. D. (2000). The changing role of outdoor leisure: a critical review of countryside tourism. In M. Robinson, J. Swarbrooke, N. Evans, P. Long & R. Sharpley (eds.). Reflections on international tourism. Environmental management and pathways to sustainable tourism. Centre for travel and tourism (pp. 1–19). University of Northumbria.
Beard, C., Swarbrooke, J., Leckie, S., & Pomfret, G. (2003). Adventure tourism: The new frontier. Routledge.
Bishop, K., & Phillips, A. (Eds.). (2004). Countryside planning: New approaches to management and conservation. Earthscan.
Blain, J., & Wallis, R. J. (2004a). Sacred sites, contested rites/rights: Contemporary pagan engagements with the past. Journal of Material Culture, 9(3), 237–261.
Blain, J., & Wallis, R.J. (2004b). Comments on Stanton moor with respect to lees cross and Endcliffe quarrying proposals: Landscape, spiritual meanings and pagan objections to proposals. Unpublished comments submitted to Peak District National Park Authority, 4 March 2004.
Blain, J., & Wallis, R. J. (2004c). Draft outline proposal for ethnographic work within the Peak District National Park: Spiritual dimensions of the park and implications for recognising and developing spiritual tourism. Unpublished draft proposal for submission to PDNPA.
Blain, J., & Wallis, R. (2007). Sacred sites. Contested rites/rights. Pagan engagements with archaeological monuments. Sussex Academic Press.
Blain, J., Exzzy, D., & Harvey, G. (Eds.). (2004). Researching paganisms. Altamira Press.
Blythe, R. (1998). Divine landscapes. A pilgrimage through Britain’s sacred places. Canterbury Press.
Bonewits, I. (2007). Defining paganism: Paleo-, meso-, and neo-. http://www.neopagan.net/PaganDefs.html. Accessed May 2017.
Butler, S., & Comley, V. (2014). Reconomics: The economic impact of outdoor recreation in the UK. Liverpool John Moores University/Sport and Recreation Alliance.
Chamberlain, K. (1997). Carrying capacity. UNEP Industry and Environment 8. UNEP.
Clark, K. (Ed.). (1999). Conservation plans in action: Proceedings of the Oxford conference. Published English Heritage.
Clarke, R., & Mount, D. (1998). Management planning: A guide. The Countryside Commission.
Coccossis, H., Mexa, A., & Collovini, A. (2002). Defining, measuring and evaluating carrying capacity in European tourism destinations. University of the Aegean.
Croney, M. (2007). Eastern moors estate – PDNPA objectives. Peak District National Park Authority.
Firth, S. (2021). The potential for the UK’s National Parks to be utilised as a resource for the nation’s mental health and wellbeing. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University.
Graefe, A. R., Vaske, J. J., & Kuss, F. R. (1984). Social carrying capacity: An integration and synthesis of twenty years of research. Leisure Sciences, 6(4), 395–431.
Graefe, A. R., Kuss, F. R., & Vaske, J. J. (1990). Visitor impact management: The planning framework. National Parks and Conservation Association.
Gregory, M., Davies, L., Kokolakakis, Y., & Barrett, D. (2014). Everything grows outside – including jobs and the economy: Valuing the contribution of the outdoor economy in Sheffield: Summary report. Sports Industry Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University.
Harvey, G. (Ed.). (2000). Indigenous religions. A companion. Cassell.
Harvey, G. (2004). Pagan studies or the study of paganisms? A case study in the study of religions. In J. Blain, D. Exzzy, & G. Harvey (Eds.), Researching paganisms (pp. 241–255). Altamira Press.
Hinnells, J. R. (Ed.). (1984). Dictionary of religions. Penguin Books.
Howden, D. (2005). The destruction of Mecca: Saudi hardliners are wiping out their own heritage. The independent, 6th August.
ICOMOS-UK. (2000). To be a pilgrim. Meeting the needs of visitors to cathedrals and churches in the United Kingdom. ICOMOS-UK.
Jenkins, S. (2006). The curse of Stonehenge will remain until it is handed back to the druids. The Guardian, 27th January, p. 34.
Jones, P., & Pennick, N. (1997). A history of pagan Europe. Routledge.
Khan, N. J. (2020). Pagan pathways to nature connectedness: An exploration of the human-nature relationship. Unpublished MSc Dissertation, Sheffield Hallam University.
Manning, R. E. (2002). How much is too much? Carrying capacity of National Parks and protected areas. In A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg, & A. Muhar (Eds.), Monitoring and management of visitor flows in recreational and protected areas conference proceedings (pp. 306–313). Bodenkultur University.
Mayor, K. (2017). Managing recreational impacts in the uplands and great outdoors. Unpublished MSc Dissertation, Sheffield Hallam University.
McCool, S. F. (2013). Limits of acceptable change and tourism. In A. Holden & D. A. Fennel (Eds.), Routledge handbook of tourism and the environment (pp. 285–298). Routledge.
McGuire, S., & Smith, K. (2007). Stanton moor conservation plan 2007. Peak National Park Authority.
Middleton, V. C., & Hawkins, R. (1998). Sustainable tourism: A marketing perspective. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Norberg-Shultz, C. (1979). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.
Palmer, M., & Palmer, N. (1997). Sacred Britain: A guide to the sacred sites and pilgrim routes of England. Scotland & Wales. Judy Piakus.
Piggott, S. (1985). William Stukeley: An eighteenth-century antiquary (Revised edition). Thames & Hudson Ltd.
Plevin, J. (2019). The healing magic of Forest bathing: Finding calm, creativity, and connection in the natural world. Ten Speed Press.
Pungetti, G., Oviedo, G., & Hooke, D. (2012). Sacred species and sites. Cambridge University Press.
Ratcliffe, D. (1977). A nature conservation review. Volume 1. Cambridge University Press.
Rotherham, I. D. (2007). Sacred sites and the tourist: Sustaining tourism infrastructures for religious tourists and pilgrims. In R. Raj & N. D. Morpeth (Eds.), Religious tourism and pilgrimage festivals management: An international perspective (pp. 64–77). CABI.
Rotherham, I. D. (2013). Emerging concepts and case studies of eco-cultural tourism. In K. Griffin, N. D. Morpeth, & R. Raj (Eds.), Cultural Tourism (pp. 74–89). CABI.
Rotherham, I. D. (2014). Eco-History: A Short History of Conservation and Biodiversity. The White Horse Press.
Rotherham, I. D. (2015a). Sacred sites and the tourist: Sustaining tourism infrastructures for religious tourists and pilgrims – A UK perspective. In R. Raj & K. Griffin (Eds.), Religious tourism and pilgrimage management: An international perspective (2nd ed., pp. 37–56). CABI.
Rotherham, I. D. (2015b). The rise and fall of countryside management. Routledge.
Rotherham I. D. (2017). Champions of grassroots conservation: A future for local authority countryside services? ECOS, 38(1).
Rotherham, I. D. (2019). Issues and approaches in managing visitors to pagan sacred sites. In M. Griffiths & P. Wiltshier (Eds.), Managing religious tourism (pp. 92–111). CABI.
Rotherham, I. D., & Mayor, K. (2019). Challenges for managing access in the great outdoors. Ranger, Spring 2019, 14–16.
Ryan, C. (1998). Kakadu National Park (Australia). A site of natural and heritage significance. In M. Shackley (Ed.), Visitor management. Case studies from world heritage sites (pp. 121–138). Butterworth Heinemann.
Self, W. (2014). Has english heritage ruined stonehenge? The guardian review, Saturday 21st June 2014, p. 2.
Shackley, M. (Ed.). (1998). Visitor management. Case studies from world heritage sites. Butterworth Heinemann.
Shackley, M. (2003). Managing sacred sites (2nd ed.). Thomson.
Sharman, P. (2012). Exmoor dreaming. In G. Pungetti, G. Oviedo, & D. Hooke (Eds.), Sacred species and sites. Advances in biocultural conservation (pp. 111–123). Cambridge University Press.
Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. H. (1984). A conceptual framework for carrying capacity determination. Leisure Science, 6(4), 433–451.
Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Oregon State University Press.
Sidaway, R. (1995). Outdoor recreation and nature conservation: Conflicts and their resolution. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Sidaway, R. (2005). Resolving environmental disputes: From conflict to consensus. Routledge.
Stankey, G. H. (1984). Carrying capacity in recreational settings: Evolution, appraisal, and application. Leisure Science, 6(4), 453–473.
Stankey, G. H., & McCool, S. F. (1984). Carrying capacity in recreational settings: Evolution, appraisal and application. Leisure Sciences, 6(4), 453–473.
Stankey, G. H., & McCool, S. F. (1991). Recreation use limits: The wildland manager’s continuing dilemma. Western Wildlands, 16(4), 2–7.
Stankey, G. H., McCool, S. F., & Stokes, G. L. (1984). Limits of acceptable change: A new framework for managing the bob Marshall wilderness. Western Wildlands, 10(3), 33–37.
Stausberg, M. (2011). Religion and tourism: Crossroads, destinations and encounters. Routledge.
Taylor, P. (2016). The Spirit of rewilding: Steps toward a shamanic ecology. Ethos.
Tresidder, R. (1999). Tourism and sacred landscapes. In D. Crouch (Ed.), Leisure/tourism geographies (pp. 137–163). Routledge.
Wallis, R. J. (2003). Shamans/Neo-Shamans. Routledge.
Woodward, S. C. (2003, April 24–27). Faith and tourism: accommodating visitor and worshipper in the historic city. In 6th US/ICOMOS international symposium, ‘managing conflict and conservation in historic cities’, 24–27 April 2003, Annapolis, Maryland.
Acknowledgments
Anonymous referees and the editors are thanked for their helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rotherham, I.D. (2023). Tourism Visitors, Pilgrimage and Contested Spaces: Community, Heritage, Ecology and Perception. In: Progano, R.N., Cheer, J.M., Santos, X.M. (eds) Host Communities and Pilgrimage Tourism. Perspectives on Asian Tourism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9677-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9677-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9676-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9677-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)