Skip to main content

The Role of Life Cycle Assessment in Analyzing Circular Economy Strategies in the Clothing Sector: A Review

Part of the Textile Science and Clothing Technology book series (TSCT)

Abstract

Clothes play a main role in societies. They protect people from weather conditions and are important means of communication and expression. However, the clothing industry is at the center of increasing criticism because of its contribution to climate change, resource depletion, water pollution, and waste generation, among others. These impacts are closely linked to the fast-paced, massive consumption-oriented, and linear model in which clothes are produced, marketed, distributed, used, and disposed of. The Circular Economy (CE) concept emerged as an alternative to the mainstream linear scheme, which seeks to recycle wastes into resources, keep products, components, and materials at their highest level of utility and value for as long as possible, while designing out waste and pollution and regenerating natural systems. Despite some identified challenges, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is very well suited to analyze CE strategies and contribute to a better environmental performance of products and systems. In this context, this research aims to contribute to a better understanding of the role of LCA in supporting CE strategies for the clothing industry by conducting a systematic literature review. After analyzing 256 papers, the results show that LCA has been applied to assess the environmental impacts of clothing since 1997, while CE and clothing publications start to appear almost 20 years later. Despite the CE framework being newer than the LCA, the speed in which CE publications increase is significantly faster. There is a wide range of LCA studies applied to different clothing life cycle stages that could be used to inform CE strategies. A number of these studies were specifically developed to inform CE. Our review shows that CE researchers today are mostly evaluating stakeholder perceptions and consumer attitudes, influenced by a business model mindset. However, CE strategies require a conscious analysis to be proved efficient and claiming that currently promoted generic circular fashion strategies have better environmental performance than traditional strategies in any scenario would still be inexact. Therefore, further work in landing CE strategies through a closer relationship with science-based tools like LCA is needed.

Keywords

  • Life cycle assessment
  • Circular economy
  • Clothing
  • Sustainability
  • Circularity
  • Literature review
  • Environmental assessment

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aguiar et al (2021) https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12246

  2. Albu AV, Caciora T, Berdenov Z, Ilies DC, Sturzu B, Sopota D, Herman GV, Ilies A, Kecse G, Ghergheles CG (2021) Digitalization of garment in the context of circular economy. Industria Textila 72(1):102–107. https://doi.org/10.35530/IT.072.01.1824

  3. Alves L, Ferreira Cruz E, Lopes SI, Faria PM, Rosado da Cruz AM (2022) Towards circular economy in the textiles and clothing value chain through blockchain technology and IoT: a review. In: Waste management and research, vol 40, issue 1. SAGE Publications Ltd, pp 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X211052858

  4. Amasawa E, Shibata T, Sugiyama H, Cleaner MHJ et al. (2020) Environmental potential of reusing, renting, and sharing consumer products: systematic analysis approach. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619333578?casa_token=YNA7WUEVtUgAAAAA:DKiRgpmqtmIqi7Z88En8_iL-jfSRNMKwkT8wi4XeYKDjGN1K0iVPC0hF_aC4A5ilZHcR6Vc

  5. Amaya J, Lelah A, Zwolinski P (2014) Design for intensified use in product–service systems using life-cycle analysis. J Eng Des 25:280–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2014.974523

  6. Baier D, Rausch TM, Wagner TF (2020) The drivers of sustainable apparel and sportswear consumption: a segmented kano perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072788

  7. Barnes EM, Daystar JS, Wallace ML (2018) Challenges of conducting a life cycle assessment for bio-based materials using a cotton example. ASABE 2018 annual international meeting, vol 1. https://doi.org/10.13031/AIM.201800013

  8. Baydar G, Ciliz N, Mammadov A (2015) Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey. Resour Conserv Recycl 104:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.007

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhardwaj V, Fairhurst A (2010) Fast fashion: response to changes in the fashion industry. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res 20(1):165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960903498300

  10. Bjørn A, Owsianiak M, Molin C, Hauschild MZ (2017) LCA history. Life Cycle Assessment: Theory Pract. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_3

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Blum P (2021) Circular fashion: making the fashion industry sustainable. https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=BT5PEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&dq=Circular+fashion+peggy&ots=EZVvRLVTtP&sig=ne90DBPgfcxbnoZqYYa3Ugt9QKU

  12. Böcker L, Meelen T (2017) Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Environ Innov Soc Trans 23:28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIST.2016.09.004

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Bressanelli G, Visintin F, Saccani N (2021) Circular economy and the evolution of industrial districts: a supply chain perspective. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108348

  14. Brydges T (2021) Closing the loop on take, make, waste: Investigating circular economy practices in the Swedish fashion industry. J Clean Prod 293:126245. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.126245

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Camacho-Otero J (2019) Consumer engagement in the circular economy: exploring clothes swapping in emerging economies from a social practice perspective. Wiley Online Library 28(1):279–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2002

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Castellani V, Sala S (2013) Beyond the throwaway society: a life cycle-based assessment of the environmental benefit of reuse. Wiley Online Library 11(3):373–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1614

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Castro-López A, Iglesias V, Puente J (2021) Slow fashion trends: are consumers willing to change their shopping behavior to become more sustainable? Sustainability 13(24):13858. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU132413858

  18. Chapagain A, Hoekstra A, Savenije H, Gautam R (2005) The water footprint of cotton consumption. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/the-water-footprint-of-cotton-consumption

  19. Chen X, Memon HA, Wang Y, Marriam I, Tebyetekerwa M (2021) Circular economy and sustainability of the clothing and textile industry. Mater Circ Econ 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42824-021-00026-2

  20. Circular Economy | World Economic Forum (n.d.). Retrieved August 5, 2022, from https://www.weforum.org/projects/circular-economy

  21. Circularity | UNEP - UN Environment Programme (n.d.). Retrieved August 5, 2022, from https://www.unep.org/circularity

  22. Claudio L (2007) Waste couture: environmental impact of the clothing industry. Environ Health Perspect 115(9). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP.115-A449

  23. Claxton S, Kent A (2020) The management of sustainable fashion design strategies: an analysis of the designer’s role. J Clean Prod 268:122112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.122112

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Colasante A, D’Adamo I (2021) The circular economy and bioeconomy in the fashion sector: emergence of a “sustainability bias.” J Clean Prod 329:129774. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.129774

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Colucci M, Vecchi A (2021) Close the loop: evidence on the implementation of the circular economy from the Italian fashion industry. Bus Strateg Environ 30(2):856–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2658

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Corvellec H, Stål HI (2017) Evidencing the waste effect of Product-Service Systems (PSSs). J Clean Prod 145:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.01.033

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  27. Dahlbo H, Aalto K, Eskelinen H, Salmenperä H (2017) Increasing textile circulation—consequences and requirements. Sustain Prod Consum 9:44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2016.06.005

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Daňo F, Drábik P, Review EH-CEB (2020) Circular business models in textiles and apparel sector in Slovakia. Cebr.vse.Cz. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.226

  29. Das M, Herweyers L, Moons I, du Bois E (2021) Strategic design opportunities to increase sustainable fashion awareness and behaviour. Proc Des Soc 1:2711–2720. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.532

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Daystar J, Chapman L, Moore M, Pires S, Golden J (2019) Quantifying apparel consumer use behavior in six countries: addressing a data need in life cycle assessment modeling. JTATM 11(1)

    Google Scholar 

  31. de Aguiar Hugo A, de Nadae J, Da R, Lima S, Shimomura Y, Hosono S (2021) Can fashion be circular? A literature review on circular economy barriers, drivers, and practices in the fashion industry’s productive chain. Sustainability 13(21):12246. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU132112246

  32. Defra UK (2011) Guidance on applying the waste hierarchy. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Guidance+on+applying+the+waste+hierarchy&btnG

  33. Dey PK, Malesios C, De D, Budhwar P, Chowdhury S, Cheffi W (2020) Circular economy to enhance sustainability of small and medium-sized enterprises. Bus Strateg Environ 29(6):2145–2169. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2492

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Diddi S, Yan RN (2019) Consumer perceptions related to clothing repair and community mending events: a circular economy perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195306

  35. Druckman A, Jackson T (2010) An exploration into the carbon footprint of UK households. Sock Res 02–10. http://resolve.sustainablelifestyles.ac.uk/sites/default/files/RESOLVE_WP_02-10.pdf

  36. Earley R, Goldsworthy K (2018) Circular textile design: old myths and new models. In: Designing for the circular economy. Routledge, pp 175–185

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ecotextiles (n.d.) Textile industry poses environmental hazards

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eder-Hansen J, Kryger J, Sisco C, Watson D, Kiorboe N, Burchardi I (2012) The nice consumer (Research Summary and Discussion Paper toward a framework for sustainable fashion in the EU). Danish Fashion Institute. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=The+nice+consumer&btnG

  39. Ellen Macarthur Foundation (2013) Toward the circular economy

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017) A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion future

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eryuruk SH (2012) Greening of the textile and clothing industry. Fibres Text Eastern Eur 20(95):22–27. https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BPW7-0024-0009

  42. Esbeih KN, Molina-Moreno V, Núñez-Cacho P, Silva-Santos B (2021) Transition to the circular economy in the fashion industry: the case of the inditex family business. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810202

  43. Esteve-Turrillas FA, de la Guardia M (2017) Environmental impact of Recover cotton in textile industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 116:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2016.09.034

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  44. Ethical Consumer (n.d.) Fast fashion’s addiction to synthetic fibres. Retrieved 19 March 2022, from https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/fashion-clothing/fast-fashions-addiction-synthetic-fibres

  45. European Comission (2020) A new circular economy action plan. Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0098&from=EN

  46. Farrant L, Olsen SI, Wangel A (2010) Environmental benefits from reusing clothes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(7):726–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11367-010-0197-Y

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Fletcher K (2009) Systems change for sustainability in textiles. In: Sustainable textiles. Elsevier, pp 369–380

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fletcher K (2013) Sustainable fashion and textiles: design journeys, second edition. Sustainable fashion and textiles: design journeys, second edition, pp 1–267. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857930/SUSTAINABLE-FASHION-TEXTILES-KATE-FLETCHER

  49. Fung Y-N, Choi T-M (2018) Product development process of an international luxury fashion brand: implications to Hong Kong fashion trading and manufacturing companies, pp 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7007-5_2

  50. Gazzola P, Pavione E, Pezzetti R (2020) Trends in the fashion industry. The perception of sustainability and circular economy: a gender/generation quantitative approach. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072809

  51. Geissdoerfer M, Savaget (2017) The circular economy–a new sustainability paradigm? J Cleaner Prod

    Google Scholar 

  52. Global Fashion Agenda (GFA), and The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (2017) Pulse of the fashion industry—global fashion agenda. https://globalfashionagenda.org/impact-initiatives/pulse-of-the-industry/

  53. Goldsworthy K, Ellams D (2019) Collaborative circular design. incorporating life cycle thinking into an interdisciplinary design process. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595416

  54. Gomes GM, Moreira N, Bouman T, Ometto AR, van der Werff E (2022) Towards circular economy for more sustainable apparel consumption: testing the value-belief-norm theory in Brazil and in The Netherlands. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020618

  55. Gonçalves A, Silva C (2021) Looking for sustainability scoring in apparel: a review on environmental footprint, social impacts and transparency. In: Energies, vol 14, issue 11. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113032

  56. Graedel TE (1997) Designing the ideal green product: LCA/SCLA in reverse. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978714

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  57. Han SLC, Chan PYL, Venkatraman P, Apeagyei P, Cassidy T, Tyler DJ (2017) Standard vs. upcycled fashion design and production. Fashion Pract 9(1):69–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2016.1227146

  58. Härtsiä A (2018) Future of sustainability in fast fashion. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/140544

  59. Hazen B (2016) Remanufacturing for the circular economy: an examination of consumer switching behavior. Wiley Online Lib 26(4):451–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1929

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  60. Henry BK, Russell SJ, Ledgard SF, Gollnow S, Wiedemann SG, Nebel B, Maslen D, Swan P (2015) LCA of wool textiles and clothing. In: Handbook of life cycle assessment (LCA) of textiles and clothing. Elsevier Inc, pp 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100169-1.00010-1

  61. Hole G, Hole A (2019) Recycling as the way to greener production: a mini review. J Clean Prod 212:910–915

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  62. Hur E (2020) Rebirth fashion: Secondhand clothing consumption values and perceived risks. J Clean Prod 273:122951. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.122951

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  63. ISO (2016a) ISO 14040:2006 environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Retrieved 19 March 2022, from https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html

  64. ISO (2016b) ISO 14044:2006 environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Retrieved 19 March 2022, from https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html

  65. James ASJ, Kent A (2019) Clothing sustainability and upcycling in ghana. Fash Pract 11(3):375–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2019.1661601

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  66. Jin Y, Song X, Tang J, Dong X, Ji H (2021) Business model of garment enterprises: a scientometric review. Text Res 91(13–14):1609–1626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517520985908

  67. Johnson E, Plepys A (2021) Product-service systems and sustainability: analysing the environmental impacts of rental clothing. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(4):1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042118

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  68. Kazan H, Akgul D, Kerc A (2020) Life cycle assessment of cotton woven shirts and alternative manufacturing techniques. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22(4):849–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10098-020-01826-X

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kim I, Jung HJ, Lee Y (2021) Consumers’ value and risk perceptions of circular fashion: comparison between secondhand, upcycled, and recycled clothing. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(3):1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031208

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  70. Kirchherr J, Reike D, Resources MH (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344917302835

  71. Koszewska M, Rahman O, Dyczewski B (2020) Circular fashion—consumers’ attitudes in cross-national study: Poland and Canada. Autex Research Journal 20(3):327–337. https://doi.org/10.2478/AUT-2020-0029

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  72. Laitala K, Klepp IG, Haugrønning V, Throne-Holst H, Strandbakken P (2021) Increasing repair of household appliances, mobile phones and clothing: experiences from consumers and the repair industry. J Clean Prod 282:125349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.125349

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  73. Laitala K, Klepp IG, Henry B (2018) Does use matter? Comparison of environmental impacts of clothing based on fiber type. Sustain (Switzerland) 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072524

  74. Laitla K, Klepp IG, Henry B (2017) Use phase of wool apparel: a literature review for improving LCA. In: 2nd conference on product lifetimes and the environment (PLATE)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Laurenti R, Moberg Å, Stenmarck Å (2017) Calculating the pre-consumer waste footprint: a screening study of 10 selected products. Waste Manage Res 35(1):65–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16675686

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  76. Lecerf L, De L, Skinner A, De S, Kunz S, De K (2017) Moving towards a circular economy with EMAS. Publications Office of the European Union

    Google Scholar 

  77. Li X, Chen L, Ding X (2019) Allocation methodology of process-level carbon footprint calculation in textile and apparel products. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164471

  78. Life Cycle Assessment—IPP—Environment—European Commission. (n.d.). Retrieved 3 Aug 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/lca.htm

  79. Liu Y, Zhu L, Zhang C, Ren F, Huang H, Liu Z (2020) Life cycle assessment of melange yarns from the manufacturer perspective. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(3):588–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11367-019-01705-8

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  80. Livia Firth (2015) The true cost. https://truecostmovie.com/

  81. López NM, Sáenz JLS, Biedermann A, Tierz AS (2020) Sustainability assessment of product-service systems using flows between systems approach. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083415

  82. Luo Y, Song K, Ding X, Wu X (2021) Environmental sustainability of textiles and apparel: a review of evaluation methods. Environ Impact Assess Rev 86:106497. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2020.106497

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  83. Machado MAD, de Almeida SO, Bollick LC, Bragagnolo G (2019) Second-hand fashion market: consumer role in circular economy. J Fash Mark Manag 23(3):382–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2018-0099

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  84. Manda BMK, Worrell E, Patel MK (2015) Prospective life cycle assessment of an antibacterial T-shirt and supporting business decisions to create value. Resour Conserv Recycl 103:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.010

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  85. Marques AD, Marques A, Ferreira F (2020) Homo Sustentabilis: circular economy and new business models in fashion industry. SN Appl Sci 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2094-8

  86. Martin M, Herlaar S (2021) Environmental and social performance of valorizing waste wool for sweater production. Sustain Prod Consum 25:425–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2020.11.023

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  87. Meyer DE, Curran MA, Gonzalez MA (2011) An examination of silver nanoparticles in socks using screening-level life cycle assessment. J Nanopart Res 13(1):147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0013-4

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Moazzem S, Crossin E, Daver F, Wang L (2021) Life cycle assessment of apparel consumption in Australia. Environ Clim Technol 25(1):71–111. https://doi.org/10.2478/RTUECT-2021-0006

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Moazzem S, Crossin E, Daver F, Wang L (2021) Assessing environmental impact reduction opportunities through life cycle assessment of apparel products. Sustain Prod Consum 28:663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2021.06.015

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  90. Moazzem S, Daver F, Crossin E, Wang L (2018) Assessing environmental impact of textile supply chain using life cycle assessment methodology. J Text Inst 109(12):1574–1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2018.1434113

  91. Moazzem S, Wang L, Daver F, Crossin E (2021) Environmental impact of discarded apparel landfilling and recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 166:105338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2020.105338

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Morais C, Carvalho C, Montagna G (2020) Dynamic wardrobe from a user’s perspective—a previous survey study for female students. Adv Intell Syst Comput 954:358–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20444-0_35

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  93. Munasinghe P, Druckman A, Dissanayake DGK (2021) A systematic review of the life cycle inventory of clothing. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.128852

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  94. Muthu SS (2015) Introduction. In: Handbook of life cycle assessment (LCA) of textiles and clothing. Woodhead publishing

    Google Scholar 

  95. Muthukumarana TT, Karunathilake HP, Punchihewa HKG, Manthilake MMID, Hewage KN (2018) Life cycle environmental impacts of the apparel industry in Sri Lanka: analysis of the energy sources. J Clean Prod 172:1346–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.10.261

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  96. Nagaraj AR (2015) Energy management in textile industry

    Google Scholar 

  97. Nencková L, Pecáková I, Šauer P (2020) Disposal behaviour of Czech consumers towards textile products. Waste Manage 106:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2020.03.001

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  98. Neto GC, de O, Teixeira MM, Souza GLV, Arns VD, Tucci HNP, Amorim M (2022) Assessment of the eco-efficiency of the circular economy in the recovery of cellulose from the shredding of textile waste. Polymers 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071317

  99. Nieminen-Kalliala E (n.d.) Environmental indicators of textile products for ISO (TYPE III) environmental product declaration. AUTEX Res J 3

    Google Scholar 

  100. Niinimäki K, Peters G, Dahlbo H, Perry P, Rissanen T, Gwilt A (2020) The environmental price of fast fashion. In: Nature reviews earth and environment, vol 1, issue 4. Springer Nature, pp 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9

  101. Norris L (2019) Waste, dirt and desire: fashioning narratives of material regeneration. Sociol Rev 67(4):886–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119854273

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  102. Olaru S, Badea I (2020) Circular product design assessment applied to clothing products. In: ICAMS proceedings of the international conference on advanced materials and systems, pp 429–434. https://doi.org/10.24264/icams-2020.IV.15

  103. O’Rourke D (2014) The science of sustainable supply chains. Science 344(6188):1124–1127. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1248526

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  104. Pal R (2016) Extended responsibility through servitization in PSS: an exploratory study of used-clothing sector. J Fash Mark Manag 20(4):453–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-12-2015-0100/FULL/PDF

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  105. Pandey K (2018) Fashion industry may use quarter of world’s carbon budget by 2050. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/environment/fashion-industry-may-use-quarter-of-world-s-carbon-budget-by-2050-61183

  106. Parisi ML, Fatarella E, Spinelli D, Pogni R, Basosi R (2015) Environmental impact assessment of an eco-efficient production for coloured textiles. J Cleaner Prod 108(PartA):514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.032

  107. Park J, Waqar Z (2022) Life cycle assessment of returnable mailers used for apparel electronic commerce: a case study in Canada. Packag Technol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/PTS.2653

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  108. Payet J (2021) Assessment of carbon footprint for the textile sector in France. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(5):1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052422

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  109. Pedersen ERG, Earley R, Andersen KR (2019) From singular to plural: exploring organisational complexities and circular business model design. J Fashion Market Manage

    Google Scholar 

  110. Peña C, Civit B, Gallego-Schmid A, Druckman A, Caldeira-Pires A, Weidema B, Mieras E, Wang F, Fava J, Milà I, Canals L, Cordella M, Arbuckle P, Valdivia S, Fallaha S, Motta W (2020) Using life cycle assessment to achieve a circular economy, vol 10

    Google Scholar 

  111. Peters G, Sandin G (2019) Environmental prospects for mixed textile recycling in Sweden. ACS Publ 7(13):11682–11690. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01742

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Petrescu L, Fermeglia M (2016) Life cycle analysis applied to acrylic acid production process with different fuels for steam generation. Elsevier

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  113. Piippo R, Niinimäki K, Aakko M (2022) Fit for the future: garment quality and product lifetimes in a CE context. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020726

  114. Pohl J, Suski P, Haucke F, Piontek FM, Jäger M (2019) Beyond production—the relevance of user decision and behaviour in LCA. Sustain Prod Life Cycle Eng Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12266-9_1/COVER

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  115. Prieto-Sandoval V, Jaca C, Ormazabal M (2018) Towards a consensus on the circular economy. J Clean Prod 179:605–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.12.224

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  116. Provin AP, Dutra AR, de A, de Sousa e Silva Gouveia ICA, Cuba, ALV (2021) Circular economy for fashion industry: use of waste from the food industry for the production of biotextiles. Technol Forecast Soc Change 169:120858. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2021.120858

  117. Qian W, Zhu J, Chen F, Ji X, Wang L, Wang X (2021) water footprint assessment of viscose staple fìber garments. Water Supply 21(5):2217–2232. https://doi.org/10.2166/WS.2021.040

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Radhakrishnan S (2021) Circular economy in textiles and fashion. Environ Footprints Eco-Design of Prod Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3698-1_6

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  119. Reike D, Vermeulen WJV, Witjes S (2018) The circular economy: new or Refurbished as CE 3.0?—exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resour Conserv Recycl 135:246–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2017.08.027

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  120. Remy N, Speelman E, Swartz S (2016) Style that’s sustainable: a new fast-fashion formula. http://dln.jaipuria.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/3091/1/Style-thats-sustainable-A-new-fast-fashion-formula.pdf

  121. Riba JR, Cantero R, Canals T, Puig R (2020) Circular economy of post-consumer textile waste: classification through infrared spectroscopy. J Clean Prod 272:123011. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.123011

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  122. Roos S, Zamani B, Sandin G, Peters GM, Svanström M (2016) A life cycle assessment (LCA)-based approach to guiding an industry sector towards sustainability: the case of the Swedish apparel sector. J Clean Prod 133:691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.05.146

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  123. Roy Choudhury AK (2014) Environmental impacts of the textile industry and its assessment through life cycle assessment, pp 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-110-7_1

  124. Saha K, Dey PK, Papagiannaki E (2021) Implementing circular economy in the textile and clothing industry. Bus Strateg Environ 30(4):1497–1530. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2670

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  125. Sandin G, Peters GM (2018) Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling: a review. J Clean Prod 184:353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.02.266

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Sandin G, Peters GM, Svanström M (2015) Using the planetary boundaries framework for setting impact-reduction targets in LCA contexts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(12):1684–1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0984-6

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  127. Sandvik IM, Stubbs W (2019) Circular fashion supply chain through textile-to-textile recycling. J Fash Mark Manag 23(3):366–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-04-2018-0058/FULL/HTML

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  128. Santiago DE, Hernández Rodríguez MJ, Pulido-Melián E (2021) Laundry wastewater treatment: review and life cycle assessment. J Environ Eng 147(10):03121001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001902

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Saxce M, de Pesnel S (n.d.) LCA of bed sheets–some relevant parameters for lifetime assessment. Elsevier. Retrieved 28 July 2022, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652612003502?casa_token=OTJdY7IqDkoAAAAA:YX0gDlZa6hg1EmN6UZn-BXU6EwmDrPWCp5jdps-oiE58vkeazRWH7E0f4vXhj7Lhioswx9c

  130. Semba T, Sakai Y, Ishikawa M, Inaba A (2020) Greenhouse gas emission reductions by reusing and recycling used clothing in Japan. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198214

  131. Senthilkannan Muthu S (ed) (2018). Sustainable innovations in apparel production. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8591-8.pdf

  132. Seolin dos SantosP, de Souza Campos L (2021) Practices for garment industry’s post-consumer textile waste management in the circular economy context: an analysis on literature. Brazil J Oper Prod Manage 18(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.004

  133. Shen L, Patel MK (2008) Life cycle assessment of polysaccharide materials: a review. J Polym Environ 16(2):154–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-008-0092-9

  134. Shen L, Worrell E (2010) Environmental impact assessment of man-made cellulose fibres. Elsevier

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  135. Sherburne A (2009) Sustainability through the supply chain. Sustainable textiles life cycle and environmental impact. Woodhead Publishing Limited, CRC Press, UK, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  136. Shirvanimoghaddam K, Motamed B, Ramakrishna S, Naebe M (2020) Death by waste: fashion and textile circular economy case. Sci Total Environ 718:137317. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.137317

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Sohn J, Nielsen KS, Birkved M, Joanes T, Gwozdz W (2021) The environmental impacts of clothing: evidence from United States and three European countries. Sustain Prod Consum 27:2153–2164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.013

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  138. Staicu D (2021) Characteristics of textile and clothing sector social entrepreneurs in the transition to the circular economy. Industria Textila 72(1):81–88. https://doi.org/10.35530/IT.072.01.202031

  139. Stenton M, Houghton JA, Kapsali V, Blackburn RS (2021) Review the potential for regenerated protein fibres within a circular economy: lessons from the past can inform sustainable innovation in the textiles industry. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(4):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042328

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  140. Stenton M, Kapsali V, Blackburn RS, Houghton JA (2021) From clothing rations to fast fashion: utilising regenerated protein fibres to alleviate pressures on mass production. Energies 14(18):5654. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN14185654

  141. Subramanian K, Sarkar MK, Wang H, Qin ZH, Chopra SS, Jin M, Kumar V, Chen C, Tsang CW, Lin CSK (2021) An overview of cotton and polyester, and their blended waste textile valorisation to value-added products: a circular economy approach–research trends, opportunities and challenges. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1966254

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  142. Ta AH, Aarikka-Stenroos L, Litovuo L (2022) Customer experience in circular economy: experiential dimensions among consumers of reused and recycled clothes. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010509

  143. Terinte N, Manda BMK, Taylor J, Schuster KC, Patel MK (2014) Environmental assessment of coloured fabrics and opportunities for value creation: spin-dyeing versus conventional dyeing of modal fabrics. J Clean Prod 72:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.002

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  144. Thatta S, Polisetty A (2020) The future is circular: a case study on MUD jeans. FIIB Bus Rev. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520950163

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  145. The Circular Economy in Cities and Regions - OECD (n.d) Retrieved 5 Aug 2022, from https://www.oecd.org/regional/cities/circular-economy-cities.htm

  146. Tseng S, Hung W (2014) A strategic decision-making model considering the social costs of carbon dioxide emissions for sustainable supply chain management. J Environ Manage

    Google Scholar 

  147. United Nations (2018) UN helps fashion industry shift to low carbon | UNFCCC. https://unfccc.int/news/un-helps-fashion-industry-shift-to-low-carbon

  148. Urbinati A, Chiaroni D (2017) Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models. Elsevier

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  149. Vadicherla T, Saravanan D, Muthu SSK (2015) Polyester recycling—technologies, characterisation, and applications. In: Environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes. Springer, Singapore, pp 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-643-0_7

  150. Vehmas K, Raudaskoski A, Heikkilä P, Harlin A, Mensonen A (2018) Consumer attitudes and communication in circular fashion. J Fash Mark Manag 22(3):286–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2017-0079

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  151. Wagner MM, Heinzel T (2020) Human perceptions of recycled textiles and circular fashion: a systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(24):1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU122410599

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  152. Walser T, Demou E, Lang DJ, Hellweg S (2011) Prospective environmental life cycle assessment of nanosilver T-shirts. Environ Sci Technol 45(10):4570–4578. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2001248

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Watson KJ, Wiedemann SG (2019) Review of methodological choices in LCA-based textile and apparel rating tools: key issues and recommendations relating to assessment of fabrics made from natural fibre types. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(14). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143846

  154. Wiedemann SG, Biggs L, Nebel B, Bauch K, Laitala K, Klepp IG, Swan PG, Watson K (2020) Environmental impacts associated with the production, use, and end-of-life of a woollen garment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(8):1486–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01766-0

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Wiedemann SG, Biggs L, Nguyen QV, Clarke SJ, Laitala K, Klepp IG (2021) Reducing environmental impacts from garments through best practice garment use and care, using the example of a Merino wool sweater. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26(6):1188–1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01909-x

  156. Williams I, Powell L (2019). Sustainable resource management by students at higher education institutions. Detritus 6:11–24. https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2019.13813

  157. Woolridge AC, Ward GD, Phillips PS, Collins M, Gandy S (2006) Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: an UK energy saving perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl 46(1):94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.06.006

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  158. Yacout D, Assessment, M. H.-E. Monitoring and, and 2016, undefined (2016) Identifying potential environmental impacts of waste handling strategies in textile industry. Springer 188(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5443-8

  159. Yamaguchi Y, Seii E, Itagaki M, Nagayama M (2011) Evaluation of domestic washing in Japan using life cycle assessment (LCA). Int J Consum Stud 35(2):243–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00975.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  160. Yang Y, He W, Chen F, Wang L (2020) Water footprint assessment of silk apparel in China. J Clean Prod 260:121050. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.121050

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Yoo F, Jung HJ, Oh K (2021) Motivators and barriers for buying intention of upcycled fashion products in China. Sustainability 13(5):2584. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13052584

  162. Yun C, Islam M, LeHew M, Polymers (2016) Assessment of environmental and economic impacts made by the reduced laundering of self-cleaning fabrics. Springer 17(8):1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-016-6320-3

  163. Zamani B, Sandin G, Peters GM (2017) Life cycle assessment of clothing libraries: can collaborative consumption reduce the environmental impact of fast fashion? J Clean Prod 162:1368–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.128

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  164. Zamani B, Svanström M, Peters G, Rydberg T (2015) A carbon footprint of textile recycling: a case study in Sweden. J Ind Ecol 19(4):676–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/JIEC.12208

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. Zanjirani Farahani R, Asgari N, van Wassenhove LN (2022) Fast fashion, charities, and the circular economy: challenges for operations management. Prod Oper Manag 31(3):1089–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13596

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  166. Zhang X, Dong F (2021) How virtual social capital affects behavioral intention of sustainable clothing consumption pattern in developing economies? A case study of China. Resour Conserv Recycl 170:105616. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2021.105616

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  167. Zink T, Geyer R (2017) Circular economy rebound. J Indus Ecol 21(3):593–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/JIEC.12545

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martí Rufí-Salís .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lizarzaburu-Egüez, L., Toboso-Chavero, S., Rufí-Salís, M. (2023). The Role of Life Cycle Assessment in Analyzing Circular Economy Strategies in the Clothing Sector: A Review. In: Muthu, S.S. (eds) Progress on Life Cycle Assessment in Textiles and Clothing. Textile Science and Clothing Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9634-4_4

Download citation