Skip to main content

Synthesis and Evaluation of Engineering Processes for the Development of Airborne Electronic Equipment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Research

Abstract

In this chapter, the design of a new framework for developing airborne electronic equipment is presented. Classical development standards and methods in the avionics space were reviewed and improved using principles obtained from modern development methods. Airworthiness and procurement considerations were considered in the new framework. A Design Science Research paradigm was used pragmatically to develop a new framework for platform-specific airborne electronic equipment. Quality Research Management was applied to align real-world requirements with research objectives, while Action Design Research was applied to ensure the practice-inspired research effort improved the theoretical knowledge base. Prior cases in the avionics development environment were used to inform a real-world case study. A qualitative meta-analysis of standards and academic literature, combined with an evolutionary (longitudinal) approach, produced a theoretical process model that was used to underpin detailed development processes at different levels in the hierarchy. The development of prototype constructs, in the form of evolutionary (emergent) models, allowed the incremental and iterative design of the new framework. Final validation of the new framework was achieved when a review committee evaluated and accepted the new framework as a valid procurement process to be implemented in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beck, K., Grenning, J., Martin, R. C., Beedle, M., Highsmith, J., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., & Kern, J. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. https://agilemanifesto.org/. Date of access: 10 February 2014.

  • ANSI/EIA-632. (1999). Processes for Engineering a System. Government Electronics and Information Technology Association (GEIA).

    Google Scholar 

  • DOD-STD-2167A. (1988). U.S. Defense Standard Defense Systems Software Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estefan, J. A. (2008). Survey of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Methodologies. INCOSE MBSE Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl, G. (2011, October). Design research in search for a paradigm: Pragmatism is the answer. European Design Science Symposium, 84–95. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M., & Wellington, J. (2013). Research methods: The key concepts (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, J. E. W., & van der Merwe, G. P. R. (2019a). Systems engineering and design science research for effective product development. IEEE AFRICON. IEEE Explore. https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRICON46755.2019.9133820

  • Holm, J. E. W., & van der Merwe, G. P. R. (2019b). Quality research management improves design research effectiveness. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 30(3), 238–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE 1220. (2005). IEEE Standard for Application and Management of the Systems Engineering Process.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207. (2007). Systems and software engineering – Software life cycle processes.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC 15288. 2008. Systems and software engineering – System life cycle processes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal for Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larman, C., & Basili, V. R. (2003). Iterative and incremental development: A brief history. IEEE Computer, 36(6), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIL-STD-1521B. (1976). Technical reviews and audits for systems, equipments, and computer software.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIL-STD-490A. (1985). Military Standard: Specification Practices.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIL-STD-498. (1994). Military Standard: Software development and Documentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIL-STD-499A. (1974). Military Standard: Engineering Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, A. M., & Lundberg, J. (2016). Applying Action Design Research (ADR) to develop concept generation and selection methods. Proceedings of the 26th CIRP Design Conference, Elsevier, 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, W. (1970). Managing the development of large software systems. Proceedings of IEEE WESCON, 26, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • RSA-MIL-STD-3. (2004). Revised. Programme Baseline Standards. Issue 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTCA/DO-178B. (1992). Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTCA/DO-178C. (2011). Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTCA/DO-254. (2000). Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAE/ARP4761. (1996). Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., & Rossi, M. (2011). Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Systems Management College. (2001). U.S. Department of Defense. Systems Engineering Fundamentals. Defense Acquisition University Press, Fort Belvoir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Alstyne, G., & Logan, R. K. (2007). Designing for emergence and innovation: Redesigning design. Artifact, 1(2), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, D. A. (2008). A process model for the development of airborne electronic equipment. Masters thesis, North-West University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, D. A. (2016). Synthesis and evaluation of engineering processes for the development of airborne electronic equipment. PhD thesis, North-West University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, D. D., Roedler, G. J., Forsberg, K. J., Hamelin, R. D., & Shortfell, T. M. (2015). INCOSE systems engineering handbook. INCOSE, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research—Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure Statement

This article is derived from the following PhD thesis: Viljoen, D. A. (2016). Synthesis and evaluation of engineering processes for the development of airborne electronic equipment (PhD thesis, North-West University).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johann Holm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holm, J., Viljoen, D. (2023). Synthesis and Evaluation of Engineering Processes for the Development of Airborne Electronic Equipment. In: Buys, P.W., Oberholzer, M. (eds) Business Research . Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9479-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics