Abstract
The presented scientific article deals with the influence of the orientation of the model and used photopolymer resins during additive manufacturing using the Digital Light Processing (DLP) method on the resulting surface roughness of the models. The examined component is a cuboid with dimensions of 14 mm × 7 mm × 28 mm. A total of five orientations of the component in the Y axis (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°) were used in this experiment. The examined samples were produced on a Zortrax Inkspire DLP 3D printer, where three parts were produced for each orientation and material. The surface roughness parameters (Ra, Rz, Rq) were measured on the printed samples using a Mitutoyo SJ-210 roughness meter. In this experiment, a total of 30 samples were produced, i.e., three samples for each of the orientations for each material used. Considering the analysis of literary studies, we can conclude that the area of surface roughness in the process of DLP technology was addressed only by a minimum of authors. Regarding research on the influence of model orientation on surface roughness in the DLP technology process, the authors Hanon and Zsidai in [1] report that the orientation of the part model has a significant effect on surface roughness. In their experiment, they prove that the best orientation of the model in relation to the least surface roughness is at the 0° and 90° orientations, just as the authors of this article point out.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
M. Hanon, L. Zsidai, Sliding surface structure comparison of 3D printed polymers using FDM and DLP technologies. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. (IOP Publishing, 2020), p. 012015
D.L. Bourell, D.W. Rosen, M.C. Leu, The roadmap for additive manufacturing and its impact. 3D Print Addit. Manuf. 1(1), 6–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2013.0002
N. Guo, M.C. Leu, Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front. Mech. Eng. 8(3), 215–243 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8
J. Jiang, X. Xu, J. Stringer, Support structures for additive manufacturing: a review. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2(4) (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp2040064
G.N. Levy, R. Schindel, J.-P. Kruth, Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies, state of the art and future perspectives. CIRP Ann. 52(2), 589–609 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60206-6
J.-P. Kruth, M.C. Leu, T. Nakagawa, Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Ann. 47(2), 525–540 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5
ISO Aditive Manufacturing—General Principles—Terminology; ISOASTM 52900
T.D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K.T.Q. Nguyen, D. Hui, Additive manufacturing (3D Printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. Part B: Eng. 143, 172–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
S.C. Ligon, R. Liska, J. Stampfl, M. Gurr, R. Mulhaupt, Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 117(15), 10212–10290 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
J. Zhang, Q. Hu, S. Wang, J. Tao, M. Gou, Digital light processing based three-dimensional printing for medical applications. Int. J. Bioprint. 6(1), 242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.242. PMID: 32782984; PMCID: PMC7415858
Ch.W. Hull, Ch.W. Lewis, R.S. Freed, S.T. Spence, W.A. Vinson, D.R. Smalley, Stereolithographic Curl Reduction, (European Patent Office, 1989). EP 0362982 A3
H. Bikas, P. Stavropoulos, G. Chryssolouris, Additive manufacturing methods and modeling approaches: a critical review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 83(1–4), 389–405 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2
J. Borrello, P. Nasser, J.C. Iatridis, K.D. Costa, 3D printing a mechanically-tunable acrylate resin on a commercial DLP-SLA printer. Addit. Manuf. 23, 374–380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.019
J. Gardan, Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54(10), 3118–3132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909
J. Schweiger, D. Edelhoff, J.F. Güth, 3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry: An overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing. J. Clin. Med. 10(9), (2010). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092010. PMID: 34067212; PMCID: PMC8125828
C. Feng, K. Zhang, R. He, G. Ding, M. Xia, X. Jin, Ch. Xie, Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite bioceramic scaffolds: Dispersion, digital light processing, sintering, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility. J. Adv. Ceram. 9, 360–373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-020-0375-8
T. Osswald, Understanding polymer processing. Process. Governing Eqn. (2017). ISBN: 978-1-56990-647-7
J. Schmidt, H. Elsayed, E. Bernardo, P. Colombo, Digital light processing of wollastonite-diopside glass-ceramic complex structures. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 38(13), 4580–4584 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.004
M. Pagac, J. Hajnys, Q.-P. Ma, L. Jancar, J. Jansa, P. Stefek, J. Mesicek, A review of vat photopolymerization technology: Materials, applications, challenges, and future trends of 3D printing. Polymers (Basel) 13(4), 1–20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040598
A.B. Saed, A.H. Behravesh, S. Hasannia, S.A.A. Ardebili, B. Akhoundi, M. Pourghayoumi, Functionalized poly l-lactic acid synthesis and optimization of process parameters for 3D printing of porous scaffolds via digital light processing (DLP) method. J. Manuf. Process. 56, 550–561 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.076
S. Barone, P. Neri, A. Paoli, A.V. Razionale, F. Tamburrino, Development of a DLP 3D printer for orthodontic applications. Procedia Manuf. 38(2019), 1017–1025 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.187
T.D. Dikova, D.A. Dzhendov, D. Ivanov, K. Bliznakova, Dimensional accuracy and surface roughness of polymeric dental bridges produced by different 3D printing processes. Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 94(2), 65–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.8660
A. Keßler, M. Dosch, M. Reymus, M. Folwaczny, Influence of 3D- printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides. J. Prosthet. Dent. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.038
J. Milde, J. Peterka, F. Jurina, P. Dobrovsky, J. Hrbal, P. Pitek, Influence of selected photopolymers on the resulting accuracy and surface roughness of the component in digital light processing technology. Ann. DAAAM Proc. Int. DAAAM Symp. 32(1), 235–245 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2507/32nd.daaam.proceedings.034
J. Milde, F. Jurina, J. Peterka, P. Dobrovszký, J. Hrbál, J. Martinovič, Influence of part orientation on the surface roughness in the process of fused deposition modeling. KEM 896, 29–37 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.896.29
J. Milde, M. Kuruc, J. Hrbal, P. Dobrovszky, T. Machac, Research of scanning speed and orientation of the model to the resulting surface roughness in the process of Selective Laser Melting. In 10th International Conference On Recent Challenges In Engineering And Technology (ICRCET), 22nd–23rd June 2022 (Bali, Indonesia, 2022). ISBN: 978-93-92105-60-9
J. Milde, J. Hrbal, J. Peterka, M. Kuruc, Research of layer thickness and selected thermoplastic materials and their influence on the surface roughness in the process of Fused Deposition Modeling technology. In 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research in Engineering and Technology 2022 (Hanoi, Vietnam, 2022). ISBN: 978-93-92105-65-4
S.H. Patil, R. Kulkarni, Surface roughness measurement based on singular value decomposition of objective speckle pattern. Opt. Lasers Eng. 150, 106847 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.106847
Ch.Y. Poon, B. Bhushan, Comparison of surface roughness measurements by stylus profiler, AFM and non-contact optical profiler. Wear 190(1), 76–88 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)06697-7
Roughness (2D) parameter. [online], [cit. 2022-07-20]. Available on the Internet: http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/knowledge/metrology/roughness/2d_parameter/
J. Peterka, A new approach to calculating the arithmetical mean deviation of a profile during copy milling. Strojniski vestnik - J. Mech. Eng. 50(12), 594–597 (2004)
M. Polakovic, I. Buransky, J. Peterka, Simulation concept for machined surface roughness and shape deviation prediction. In Conf. 19th Intern. Sympos. of DAAAM, Trnava, Slovakia, Oct 22–25, 2008 Annals of DAAAM Proceedings of the 19th Int. DAAAM Symp. Book Series: Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings, pp. 1089–1090
T. Vopat, J. Peterka, M. Kovac, I. Buransky, The wear measurement process of ball nose end mill in the copy milling operations. In 24th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, 2013, Procedia Engineering, vol. 69, pp. 1038–1047 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.088
J. Peterka, P. Pokorny, Influence of the Lead Angle from the Vertical Axis Milling on Effective Radius of the Cutter. In Conference: 7th International Congress of Precision Machining (ICPM 2013), (Miskolc, HUNGARY, 2013) OCT 03–05, 2013 Sponsor(s): Int Visegrad Fund; SANDVIK Cromant. Precision Machining VII, Book Series: Key Engineering Materials, vol. 581, pp. 44–49
T. Vopat, J. Peterka, V. Simna, M. Kuruc, The influence of different types of copy milling on the surface roughness and tool life of end mills. In Conference: 25th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, (Oldest technical univ, Vienna, AUSTRIA) Nov 26–29 (2014)
J. Peterka, P. Pokorny, S. Vaclav, B. Patoprsty, M. Vozar, Modification of cutting tools by drag finishing. MM Sci. J. 3822–3825 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2020_03_2019130
J. Peterka, P. Pokorny, S. Vaclav, CAM strategies and surfaces accuracy. In Conference: 19th International Symposium of the Danube-Adria-Association-for-Automation-and-Manufacturing, (Trnava, Slovakia Date: OCT 22–25, 2008), Annals of DAAAM for 2008 & Proceedings of the 19th International DAAAM Symposium, Book Series: Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings, (pp. 1061–1062)
M. Beno, M. Zvoncan, M. Kovac, J. Peterka, Circular interpolation and positioning accuracy deviation measurement on five axis machine tools with different structures. Tehnicki vjesnik - Tech. Gazette 2(3) 479–484 (2013)
I. Misumi, R. Kizu, K. Sugawara, A. Hirai, S. Gonda, Extension of the probe-tip error evaluation for areal surface roughness measurements using metrological AFM. Measurem. Sens. 18, 100092 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2021.100092
H. Wenbin, Y.T. Lee, G. Haiqing, A study of the staircase effect induced by material shrinkage in rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyping J. 11(2), 82–89 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540510589449
Acknowledgements
The article was written with the support of the project VEGA 1/0019/20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Milde, J., Peterka, J., Kuruc, M., Hrbal, J., Dobrovszky, P. (2023). Influence of the Part Orientation and Type of Used Photopolymer Resin on Surface Roughness in the Process of Digital Light Processing Technology. In: Mohd Salleh, M.A.A., Che Halin, D.S., Abdul Razak, K., Ramli, M.I.I. (eds) Proceedings of the Green Materials and Electronic Packaging Interconnect Technology Symposium. EPITS 2022. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 289. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9267-4_77
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9267-4_77
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9266-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9267-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)