Skip to main content

Unilateral Pedicled TRAM Flap Plus Contralateral Free DIEP Flap

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncoplastic Flap Surgery
  • 344 Accesses

Abstract

To ensure sufficient blood supply of a unilateral pedicled rectus abdominis flap, the contralateral deep inferior epigastric vessels can be revascularized. Many reports have introduced the specific methods [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berrino P, Casabona F, Adami M, Muggianu M. The “parasite” TRAM flap for autogenous tissue breast reconstruction in patients with vertical midabdominal scars. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;43(2):119–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, et al. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(5):322–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. Unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(4):1142–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ascherman JA, Seruya M, Bartsich SA. Abdominal wall morbidity following unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps: an outcomes analysis of 117 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A, Lipsitz S, Pribaz JJ. Outcomes and patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction with bilateral pedicled TRAM flaps in 105 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(4):1153–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knox AD, Ho AL, Leung L, et al. Comparison of outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction using the DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a 12-year clinical retrospective study and literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(1):16–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saulis AS, Mustoe TA, Fine NA. A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(6):1669–76; discussion 1677–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thoma A, Veltri K, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, Duku E. Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(6):1650–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tong WM, Bazakas A, Hultman CS, Halvorson EG. The transition from pedicle transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous to perforator flap: what is the cost of opportunity. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(5):489–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng MH, Robles JA, Ulusal BG, Wei FC. Reliability of zone IV in the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: a single center’s experience with 74 cases. Breast. 2006;15(2):158–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Atisha D, Alderman AK. A systematic review of abdominal wall function following abdominal flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(2):222–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feingold RS. Improving surgeon confidence in the DIEP flap: a strategy for reducing operative time with minimally invasive donor site. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62(5):533–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A, et al. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(4):1133–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Venkat R, Lee JC, Rad AN, Manahan MA, Rosson GD. Bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: review of a single surgeon’s early experience. Microsurgery. 2012;32(4):275–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindsey JT. Integrating the DIEP and muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM techniques optimizes surgical outcomes: presentation of an algorithm for microsurgical breast reconstruction based on perforator anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(1):18–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, Z., Gao, H. (2023). Unilateral Pedicled TRAM Flap Plus Contralateral Free DIEP Flap. In: Li, Z., Song, D. (eds) Oncoplastic Flap Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8926-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8926-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8925-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8926-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics