Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Potenzielle Auswirkungen des BIT zwischen China und den USA auf Chinas verarbeitende Sektoren

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handelskrieg und Handelsgespräche zwischen China und den USA

  • 832 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Artikel wird anhand verschiedener ökonometrischer Modelle und anderer Belege festgestellt, dass die ausländischen Direktinvestitionen und damit auch die bilateralen Investitionsabkommen zwischen China und den USA (BIT) insgesamt positive Auswirkungen auf das chinesische verarbeitende Gewerbe haben und die Produktivität und Rentabilität der Unternehmen steigern. Das verarbeitende Gewerbe als Ganzes hat sich bereits der Weltwirtschaft geöffnet und muss diesen Prozess fortsetzen.

Dieser Beitrag wurde gemeinsam mit Fan Zhang, Professor an der National School of Development der Universität Peking, verfasst und im China Economic Journal, 2016, veröffentlicht.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bergsten, C. F. (2005). A new foreign economic policy for the United States. In C. F. Bergsten (Hrsg.), The United States and the world economy. Institute for International Economics. Peterson Institute for International Economies. http://leyqlvs.iie.com/publications/chapters_preview/3802/1iie3802.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B. A. (1997). Firm-specific assets and the link between exchange rates and foreign direct investment. American Economic Review, 87(3), 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Jeremy Clegg, L., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustos, P. (2005). Rising wage inequality in the Argentinean manufacturing sector: The impact of trade and foreign direct investment on technology and skill upgrading. Harvard University Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campa, J. M. (1993). Entry by foreign firms in the U.S. under exchange rate uncertainty. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75(4), 614–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, K. Y. (2010). Spillover effects of FDI via exports on innovation performance of China’s high technology industries. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, F. (2013). 2012 U.S. BIT template and China–U.S. BIT negotiations. International Trade Problems, 2. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mooji, R. A., & Ederveen, S. (2003). Taxation and foreign direct investment: A synthesis of empirical research. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(6), 673–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. (2013). Chinese outward direct investment research: Theoretical integration and recommendations. Management and Organization Review, 9(3), 513–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R., Li, Z., & Yu, M. (2014). Exports and credit constraints under incomplete information: Theory and application to China. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), 729–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froot, K. A., & Stein, J. C. (1991). Exchange rates and foreign direct investment: An imperfect capital markets approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1191–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gtubert, H., & Mutti, J. (1991). Taxes, tariffs and transfer pricing in multinational corporate decision making. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(2), 285–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, D. G. (1984). Tax policy and foreign direct investment in the United States. National Tax Journal, 37(4), 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, D. G. (1985). Tax policy and foreign direct investment. Journal of Public Economics, 26(1), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H., & Chenjun, Z. (2013). China’s strategy under new situation in opening-up. International Economic Review, 4. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. B. (2015, February). Roll of a biliteral investment treaty in increasing trade in services between China and the United States. In Toward a US–China investment treaty (PIIE Briefing 15-1). Peterson Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, D., & Qingchang, Z. (2011). Gravity model analysis of U.S. FDI in China. World Economy, 5. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Chang, S. J. (1996). Platform investment and volatile exchange rates: Direct investment in the U.S. by Japanese electronic companies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., & Liu, H. (2012). Are there threshold effects of FDI on environment? New evidence from 220 cities in China. Financial and Trade Economy, 9. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Y., & Dong Y. (2013, December). China–U.S. BIT negotiations: Institutional factors, core terms and corresponding strategies (IIS International Investment Working Paper, No. 201305). Research Institute of the World Economy and Politics Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. E. (2001). Foreign direct investors in three financial crises (NBER Working Paper No. 8084).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Luo, Y., Qiu, Z., & Zhang, R. (2014). FDI and economic development: Evidence from China’s regional growth. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 50, 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, S., & Gary, C. H. (2015, February). State-owned enterprises and competition policy: The US perspective. In Toward a US–China investment treaty (PIIE Briefing 15-1). Peterson Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (1992). Internalization: An event study test. Journal of International Economics, 33(1–2), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navaretti, I. B., & Anthony, J. V. (2004). Multinational firms in the world economy. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G. I. P., Tabuchi, T., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Agglomeration and trade revisited. International Economic Review, 43(2), 409–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., & Jian, T. (2013). New trend in national security investigation of the U.S. foreign investment committee. International Economic Review, 5. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson Institute for International Economics and the China Development Research Foundation. (2015). Toward a US–China bilateral investment treaty. Unedited Event Transcript, Peterson Institute. http://www.piie.com/publications/papers/transcript-20150210panel1.pdf

  • Schott, J., & Cathleen, C. (2015, February). The China–Japan–Korea trilateral investment agreement: Implications for US policy and the US–China bilateral investment treaty. In Toward a US–China investment treaty (PIIE Briefing 15-1). Peterson Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Wang, M., & Sunny Wong, M. C. (2014). FDI location and the relevance of spatial linkages: Evidence from provincial and industry FDI in China. Review of International Economics, 22(1), 86–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau, H. L., Huang, C. J., & Chen, F. C. (2013). International involvement, target market selection, and consolidated performance: A firm-level analysis of Taiwan’s FDI in China (September–October 2013). Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 49, 184–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, D. L. (1994). The impact of U.S. tax reform on foreign direct investment in the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 54(2), 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B. (2013). China–U.S. FDI: Challenges and deadlock. International Economic Review, 5. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, S. J. (2000a). Local corruption and global capital flows. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 303–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, S. J. (2000b). How taxing is corruption on international investors? Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Z. (2013). How to respond to the China–U.S. BIT substantial negotiations? International Economic Review, 6. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeaple, S. R. (2003). The complex integration strategies of multinationals and gross country dependencies in the structure of foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics, 60(2), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, F., & Yu, M. (2015, February). The potential impacts of BIT on China’s manufacturing industries. In Toward a Sino–US investment treaty (S. 67–90). China Development Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, F., & Zheng, J. (1999). The impacts of multinational companies on China’s economic structure and efficiency. Economic Research, 1, 45–52. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Dieser Artikel basiert auf Forschungsarbeiten zum BIT zwischen den USA und China, die vom Peterson Institute for International Economics und der China Development Research Foundation unterstützt wurden. Wir danken den anonymen Gutachtern, Nicholas Lardy, Jeffrey Schott, Adam Posen, Pieter Bottelier, Lu Mai, Fang Jin, Chen Cheng, Cheng Xiaofeng, Wang Jiao und Yu Jiantuo für ihre Kommentare. Dank für die Forschungsunterstützung durch Yuan Dong, Cui Xiaomin, Gong Zheng und Wei Jinlin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China Center for Economic Forschung (CCER), Nationale Schule der Entwicklung (NSD)Universität Peking, Peking Universität, Peking, China

    Miaojie Yu

Authors
  1. Miaojie Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Anhang A. Anhang

Anhang A. Anhang

Siehe Tab. 9.8

Tab. 9.8 Aktuelle Liste der eingeschränkten und verbotenen Branchen, verarbeitendes Gewerbe, 2011
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yu, M. (2023). Potenzielle Auswirkungen des BIT zwischen China und den USA auf Chinas verarbeitende Sektoren. In: Handelskrieg und Handelsgespräche zwischen China und den USA. Springer Gabler, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8734-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8734-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8733-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8734-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation