Skip to main content

Bankruptcy Probability and Firm Life Expectancy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamental Problems and Solutions in Finance

Part of the book series: Contributions to Finance and Accounting ((CFA))

  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores two problems: bankruptcy probability and company life expectancy. Bankruptcy probability and bankruptcy cost are the major bankruptcy risk measurement and major concern of the relevant parties of a company. However, neither bankruptcy probability nor bankruptcy cost can be calculated in mainstream finance. This chapter solves this quantitative problem based on the bankruptcy cost model derived in Chapter “Debt/Loan Risk, Bankruptcy Cost and Debt/Loan Pricing”. In addition, the bankruptcy probability and cost can be calculated for potential current bankruptcy and overall bankruptcy respectively. Such new bankruptcy risk analyses are illustrated based on the case of the three home appliances giants in China. Further, the findings in the bankruptcy risks setup the theoretical foundation for us to further predict the company life expectancy. We then explore the estimation of company life expectancy. Based on the queueing theory, the estimation of company life expectancy depends on the long run applicable annual bankruptcy probability. Further discussion reveals the logic from cumulative bankruptcy probability to annual bankruptcy probability and further to the long run applicable annual bankruptcy probability. Hence the problem of company life expectancy estimation is ideally solved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The total asset can provide additional guarantee for the repayment of the current debt. This implies some of the repayment pressure or risk is partaken by the total asset, or the current asset is relative less risky than the total asset. But the specific measurement of the division of the risk is a little complicated. We just deal it simply by cutting the volatility of the total asset by 50% as the volatility of the current asset.

  2. 2.

    One of the possible situations is: the growth rate is 8%, required payback period is 10 years, and the expected return on equity is 12%, then, based on Eq. (29) in Chapter “Stock and Equity Valuation: Where Discounting Does Not Work”, ZZ P/B = [(1 + g)n − 1](1 + g)re/g = 2.03.

  3. 3.

    For healthy companies like those three companies, this is a reasonable assumption.

  4. 4.

    Round up rather than round off.

References

  1. Zhang Z. Volatility and company life expectancy—research based on ZZ bankruptcy cost model. Res Financ Issues. 2018:91–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Z. Modeling corporate bankruptcy risk and its application. Mon J Finance Account. 2021;11:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Altman EI, Haldeman R, Narayanan P. Zeta analysis: a new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations. J Bank Finance. 1977;1(1): 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  1. Beaver WH. Financial ratios as predictors of failure. J Account Res. 1966;4:71–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaver WH. Alternative accounting measures as predictors of failure. Account Rev. 1968;43:113–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Altman EI. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Finance. 1968;189–209.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agarwal V, Taffler RJ. Twenty-five years of the Taffler z-score model: does it really have predictive ability? Account Bus Res. 2007;37:285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashraf S, Félix EGS, Serrasqueiro Z. Do traditional financial distress prediction models predict the early warning signs of financial distress? J Risk Financ Manage. 2019;12:55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koh HC, Tan SS. A neural network approach to the prediction of going concern status. Account Bus Res. 1999;29:211–16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sigrist F, Hirnschall C. Grabit: gradient tree-boosted Tobit models for default prediction. J Bank Finance. 2019;102:177–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hull JC. Risk management and financial institutions. 3rd ed. Wiley; 2012. p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiqiang Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, Z. (2023). Bankruptcy Probability and Firm Life Expectancy. In: Fundamental Problems and Solutions in Finance. Contributions to Finance and Accounting. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8269-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics