Skip to main content

Machine Learning Techniques Applied of Land Use—Land Cover (LULC) Image Classification: Research Avenues Challenges with Issues

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobile Radio Communications and 5G Networks

Abstract

An easy-to-use programming environment, open access to satellite data, and access to high-end consumer computation power has made it very easy to align remote sensing and machine learning during the new era. A variety of remote sensing applications have utilized publicly available data. Land use (LU) image classification has become vitally important in the natural environment because of the expansion of some global changes relating to the temperament of the earth. Therefore, researchers should investigate this area more deeply. This paper presents a complete review to help out the researchers to carry on with the land use/land cover for image classification process, as there are limited numbers of review articles to assist them. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the classification of satellite images using mainly employed machine learning algorithms. We discuss the general process of LU/LC based on multi-image classification, as well as the challenges and issues faced by researchers. Only a few studies evaluate machine learning algorithms for image classification using openly available data, however.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Maxwell AE, Warner TA, Fang F (2018) Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: an applied review. Int J Remote Sens 39:2784–2817. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1433343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu L, Zhu X, Lawes R, Dunkerley D, Zhang H (2019) Comparison of machine learning algorithms for classification of LiDAR points for characterization of canola canopy structure. Int J Remote Sens 40:5973–5991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Song J, Gao S, Zhu Y, Ma C (2019) A survey of remote sensing image classification based on CNNs. Big Earth Data. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1657720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belete F, Maryo M, Teka A (2021) Land use/land cover dynamics and perception of the local communities in Bita district, south western Ethiopia. Int J River Basin Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2021.1938092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akar O, Tunc Gormus E (2021) Land use/land cover mapping from airborne hyperspectral images with machine learning algorithms and contextual information. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1945149

  6. Congalton RG, Green K (2019) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Fonji SF, Taff GN (2014) Using satellite data to monitor land-use land-cover change in North-eastern Latvia. Springerplus 3(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Langat PK, Kumar L, Koech R, Ghosh MK (2019) Monitoring of land use/land-cover dynamics using remote sensing: a case of Tana River Basin, Kenya. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1655798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffmann J (2005) The future of satellite remote sensing in hydrogeology. Hydrogeol J 13:247–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajan SNM, Loganathan A, Manoharan P (2020) Survey on land use/land cover (LU/LC) change analysisin remote sensing and GIS environment: techniques and challenges. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09091-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Talukdar S et al (2020) Land-use land-cover classification by machine learning classifiers for satellite observations—a review. Remote Sens

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maxwell AE, Warner TA, Fang F (2018) Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: an applied review. Int J Remote Sens 39(9):2784–2817. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1433343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang L, Zhang L, Du B (2016) Deep learning for remote sensing data: a technical tutorial on the state of the art. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag 4(2):22–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2016.2540798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi D, Yang X (2016) An assessment of algorithmic parameters affecting image classification accuracy by random forests. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 82(6):407–417. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.82.6.407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kale SR, Holambe RS (2021) Proposed methods for enhancement in land use land cover (LULC) identification using various existing and novel band arithmetic approaches. Appl Geogr 11 Aug 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2021.1966829

  16. Shafizadeh-Moghadam H et al (2021) Google Earth Engine for large-scale land use and land cover mapping: an object-based classification approach using spectral, textural and topographical factors. GISci Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2021.1947623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Belgiu M, Dragu L (2016) Random forest in remote sensing: a review of applications and future directions. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 114:24–31 Landsat Imagery Remote Sens Environ 141:14–23

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heidarlou HB et al (2019) Effects of preservation policy on land usechanges in Iranian Northern Zagros forests. Land Use Policy 81:76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Akar A, Gokalp E, Akar O, Yilmaz V (2016) Improving classification accuracy of spectrally similar land covers in the rangeland and plateau areas with a combination of WorldView-2 and UAV images. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1178816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang Y, Pannell CW (2009) A hybrid approach for land use/land cover classification. GISci Remote Sens 46(4):365–387. https://doi.org/10.2747/1548-1603.46.4.365

  21. Ahmad W, Choi M, Kim S, Kim D (2019) Detection of land subsidence and its relationship with land cover types using ESA Sentinel satellite data: a case study of Quetta Valley, Pakistan. Int J Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1633704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Webb EL et al (2004) Scanning, compression and land cover classification of astronaut acquired orbital photographs. Int J Remote Sens 25(3):653–667

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nurwauziyah I, Umroh DS, Putra IGB, Firdaus MI (2018) Satellite image classification using decision tree, SVM and k-nearest neighbor. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326316293

  24. Deshpande P, Belwalkar A, Dikshit O, Tripathi S (2021) Historical land cover classification from CORONA imagery using convolutional neural networks and geometric moments. Int J Remote Sens 42(13):5144–5171. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2021.1910365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Akar O (2016) The rotation forest algorithm and object based classification method for land use mapping through UAV images. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1277273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Akar O (2017) Mapping land use with using rotation forest algorithm from UAV images. Eur J Remote Sens 50(1):269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1319252

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. IDRISI Selva Online Help System (n.d) http://www.clarklabs.org/support/IDRISI-Taiga-Help-System.cfm

  28. Pan X, Wang Z, Gao Y, Dang X, Han Y (2021) Detailed and automated classification of land use/land cover using machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1917005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Phan DC, Trung TH, Truong VT, Nasahara KN (2021) Ensemble learning updating classifier for accurate land cover assessment in tropical cloudy areas. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1878292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdi AM (2019) Land cover and land use classification performance of machine learning algorithms in a boreal landscape using Sentinel-2 data. GISci Remote Sens

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gislason PO, Benediktsson JA, Sveinsson JR (2006) Random forests for landcover classification. Pattern Recogn Lett 27:294–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hamedianfar A, Mohamed BA, Gibril MH, Pellikka PKE (2020) Synergistic use of particle swarm optimization, artificial neural network, and extreme gradient boosting algorithms for urban LULC mapping from WorldView-3 images. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2020.1737974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang L, Sun Z, Li J, Shi L, Kong H, Yang Y, Li T (2021) Spatiotemporal patterns and driving forces of land-use and land-cover change in the Mu Us Sandy Land, China from 1980 to 2018. Arid Land Res Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2021.1933648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Temgoua LF, Elono ALM, Njiaghait YM, Ngouh A, Kengne CN (2021) Land use and land cover dynamics in the Melap Forest Reserve West Cameroon: implications for sustainable management. Geol Ecol Landscapes. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2021.1923269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Temgoua LF, Solefack MCM, Voufo VN, Belibi CT, Tanougong A (2018) Spatial and temporal dynamic of land-cover/land-use and carbon stocks in Eastern Cameroon: a case study of the teaching and research forest of the University of Dschang. For Sci Technol 14(4):181–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2018.1520743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kogo BK, Kumar L, Koech R (2019) Analysis of spatio-temporal dynamics of land use and cover changes in western Kenya. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1608594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hussain S, Karuppannan S (2021) Land use/land cover changes and their impact on land surface temperature using remote sensing technique in district Khanewal, Punjab Pakistan. Geol Ecol Landscapes. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2021.1923272

  38. Kamusoko C, Aniya M (2009) Hybrid classification of Landsat data and GIS for land use/cover change analysis of the Bindura district, Zimbabwe. Int J Remote Sens 30(1):97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802244268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Grinblat Y, Gilichinsky M, Benenson I (2016) Cellular automata modeling of land-use/land-cover dynamics: questioning the reliability of data sources and classification methods. Ann Am Assoc Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1213154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zubair OA, Ji W (2015) Assessing the impact of land cover classification methods on the accuracy of urban land change prediction. Can J Remote Sens 41(3):170–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2015.1065706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Congedo L, Sallustio L, Munafo M, Ottaviano M, Tonti D, Marchetti M (2016) Copernicus high-resolution layers for land cover classification in Italy. J Maps

    Google Scholar 

  42. Namdar M, Adamowski J, Saadat H, Sharifi F, Khiri A (2014) Land-use and land-cover classification in semi-arid regions using independent component analysis (ICA) and expert classification. Int J Remote Sens 35(24):8057–8073. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.978035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Aredehey G, Mezgebu A, Girma A (2018) Land use land-cover classification analysis of Giba catchment using hyper temporal MODIS NDVI satellite images. Int J Remote Sens 39(3):810–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1392639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tolessa T, Senbeta F, Abebe T (2016) Land use/land cover analysis and ecosystem services valuation in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Forests Trees Livelihoods. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2016.1221780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Salem M, Tsurusaki N, Divigalpitiya P (2020) Land use/land cover change detection and urban sprawl in the peri-urban area of greater Cairo since the Egyptian revolution of 2011. J Land Use Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2020.1765425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Aswatha SM et al (2020) Unsupervised classification of land cover using multi-modal data from multispectral and hybrid-polarimetric SAR imageries. Int J Remote Sens 41(14):5277–5304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1731771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Heuschmidt F, Gomez-Candon D, Soares C, Cerasoli S, Silva JMN (2020) Cork oak woodland land-cover types classification: a comparison between UAV sensed imagery and field survey. Int J Remote Sens 41(19):7649–7659

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hansford D, Slater D (2020) Canopy cover and land-use change in Torbay from 2010 to 2018. Arboricult J. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2020.1767968

  49. Nex F, Delucchi L, Gianelle D, Neteler M, Remondino F, Dalponte M (2015) Land cover classification and monitoring: the STEM open-source solution. Eur J Remote Sens 48(1):811–831. https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20154845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Development Team, Q. G. I. S. (2019) QGIS geographic information system. Open-source geospatial foundation project. http://qgis.osgeo.org

  51. Amani M, Mahdavi S et al (2019) Canadian wetland inventory using google earth engine: the first map and preliminary results. Remote Sens 11(7):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mahdianpari M, Brisco B et al (2020) The second-generation Canadian Wetland inventory map at 10 meters resolution using google earth engine. Can J Remote Sens 46(3):360–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2020.1802584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zurqani HA, Post CJ, Mikhailova EA, Schlautman MA, Sharp JL (2018) Geospatial analysis of land use change in the savannah river basin using google earth engine. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 69:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sarathchandra C et al (2021) Impact of land use and land cover changes on carbon storage in rubber dominated tropical Xishuangbanna, South West China. Ecosyst Health Sustain 7(1):1915183. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2021.1915183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Thakur R, Panse P (2022) EuroSAT dataset: preprocessing of images towards land use with distinct filters, Stochastic modeling; applications 26(3) (January—June, Special Issue 2022 Part—7)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bengio Y (2009) Learning deep architectures for AI. Found Trends Mach Learn 2(1):1–127

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashant Panse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thakur, R., Panse, P. (2023). Machine Learning Techniques Applied of Land Use—Land Cover (LULC) Image Classification: Research Avenues Challenges with Issues. In: Marriwala, N., Tripathi, C., Jain, S., Kumar, D. (eds) Mobile Radio Communications and 5G Networks. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 588. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7982-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7982-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7981-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7982-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics