Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

News Discourse and Relevant Linguistic Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media Representations of Macau’s Gaming Industry in Greater China

  • 239 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, D., Wilson, A., & Rayson, P. (2002). Introduction to the USAS category system. Benedict Project Report. Retrieved from ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/usas/usas%20guide.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2006). Public discourses of gay men. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2010). Representations of Islam in British broadsheet and tabloid newspapers 1999–2005. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(2), 310–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2014). Bad wigs and screaming mimis: Using corpus-assisted techniques to carry out critical discourse analysis of the representation of trans people in the British press. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 211–236). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2017). American and British English: Divided by a common language? Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920103

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2005). A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2015). Introduction. In P. Baker & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora (pp. 1–20). Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, S., & Allen, W. L. (2016). Constructing immigrants: Portrayals of migrant groups in British national newspapers, 2010–2012. International Migration Review, 50(1), 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boczkowski, P. J. (2004). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindle, A. (2016a). A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of the Sunflower Student Movement in the English-language Taiwanese press. Discourse & Society, 27(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brindle, A. (2016b). The language of hate: A corpus linguistic analysis of white supremacist Language. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caple, H. (2010). Doubling-up: Allusion and bonding in multi-semiotic news stories. In M. Bednarek & J. R. Martin (Eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity and affiliation (pp. 111–134). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W. (2006). Describing the extended meanings of lexical cohesion in a corpus of SARS spoken discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W. (2012). Exploring corpus linguistics: Language in action. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W. (2013). Corpus-based linguistic approaches to critical discourse analysis. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–8). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W., & Ho, J. (2014). Brainwashing or nurturing positive values: Competing voices in Hong Kong’s national education debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W., & Lam, P. W. Y. (2010). Media discourses in Hong Kong: Change in representation of human rights. Text & Talk, 30(5), 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W., & Lam, P. W. Y. (2013). Western perceptions of Hong Kong ten years on: A corpus-driven critical discourse study. Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conboy, M. (2010). The language of newspapers: Socio-historical perspectives. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conboy, M. (2006). Tabloid Britain: Constructing a community through language. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, J. (2009). Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), 29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de los Heros, S. (2009). Linguistic pluralism or prescriptivism? A CDA of language ideologies in Talento, Peru’s official textbook for the first-year of high school. Linguistics and Education, 20(2), 172–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, S., Heider, D., Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2006). Influence of newspaper reporting on adolescents’ attitudes toward people with mental illness. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41(4), 318–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esses, V. M., Medianu, S., & Lawson, A. S. (2013). Uncertainty, threat, and the role of the media in promoting the dehumanization of immigrants and refugees. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 518–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power (1st ed.). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feez, S., Iedema, R., & White, P. R. R. (2008). Media Literacy. Surry Hills, NSW: NSW Adult Migrant Education Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, W. D. (2017). Ideological dissonances among Chinese-language newspapers in Hong Kong: A corpus-based analysis of reports on the occupy central movement. Discourse & Communication, 11(6), 549–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J. (2018). Critical discourse studies and context. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 165–178). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J., Li, D. C., & Tran, S. (2002). Discriminatory news discourse: Some Hong Kong data. Discourse & Society, 13(3), 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, L. (2014). Which unit for linguistic analysis of ESP corpora of written text? In M. Gotti & D. S. Giannoni (Eds.), Corpus analysis descriptive and pedagogical purposes (pp. 25–42). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 3–14). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, J., & Mensing, D. (2004). US news web sites better, but small papers still lag. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(2), 98–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulliver, T. (2010). Immigrant success stories in ESL textbooks. Tesol Quarterly, 44(4), 725–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunston, S. (2006). Corpus linguistics. Linguistics, 7(2), 234–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Culpeper, J., & Suhr, S. (2003). From politically correct councillors to Blairite nonsense: Discourses of political correctness in three British newspapers. Discourse & Society, 14(1), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joye, S. (2010). News discourses on distant suffering: A critical discourse analysis of the 2003 SARS outbreak. Discourse & Society, 21(5), 586–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2014). Examining US news media discourses about North Korea: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 25(2), 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2012). Racism in the global era: Analysis of Korean media discourse around migrants, 1990–2009. Discourse & Society, 23(6), 657–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, J. S. (2009). Punctuating the home page: Image as language in an online newspaper. Discourse & Communication, 3(2), 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, V. (2012). How to analyse collective identity in discourse: Textual and contextual parameters. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 5(2), 19-38. http://cadaad.net/2012_volume_5_issue_2/79-66.

  • L’Hôte, E. (2010). New Labour and globalization: Globalist discourse with a twist? Discourse & Society, 21(4), 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, R. (2013). Speak English or go home: The anti-immigrant discourse of the American “English Only Movement.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 7(1), 100–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2011). Collision of language in news discourse: A functional–cognitive perspective on transitivity. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(3), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lido, C., Brown, R., Samson, A., & Calitri, R. (2006). Effects of the media priming asylum-seeker stereotypes on thoughts and behaviour. Economic and Social Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, A. (2014). Critical discourse analysis in applied linguistics: A methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. T., Chang, T. T. G., Loi, E. H., & Chan, A. C. H. (2015). Macau gambling industry: Current challenges and opportunities next decade. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(3), 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., & Li, C. (2017). Competing discursive constructions of China’s smog in Chinese and Anglo-American English-language newspapers: A corpus-assisted discourse study. Discourse & Communication, 11(4), 386–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mautner, G. (2007). Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly. Language in Society, 36(01), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mautner, G. (2008). Analysing newspaper, magazines and other print media. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyżanowski (Eds.), Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences (pp. 30–53). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mautner, G. (2016). Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 154–179). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, M. (2010). Rituals of personal experience in television news interviews. Discourse & Communication, 4(2), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, J., & Taylor, C. (2009). Us and them: How immigrants are constructed in British and Italian newspapers. In P. Bayley & G. Williams (Eds.), European identity (pp. 190–223). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolff, A. (2014). The metaphor of the ‘body politic’ across languages and cultures. In F. Polzenhagen, Z. Kövecses, S. Vogelbacher, & S. Kleinke (Eds.), Cognitive Explorations into Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 85–99). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in the study of media discourse. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 563–577). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ooi, V. B. (2008). The lexis of electronic gaming on the web: A sinclairian approach. International Journal of Lexicography, 21(3), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orpin, D. (2005). Corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Examining the ideology of sleaze. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, F. H., & Biachi, M. M. (2016). Women in the 2010 Brazilian presidential elections: Two weekly magazines’ discourses on women candidates. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(4), 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, G. (2016). Ideological struggle over epistemic and political positions in news discourse on migrant activism in Sweden. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(3), 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, C. W. (2015). Placing come and go: locating the lexical item. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, A. (2016). Semantic annotation. In P. Baker & J. Egbert (Eds.), Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research (pp. 57–72). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, A., & Baker, P. (2012). Does semantic tagging identify cultural change in British and American English? International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 295–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, A., & Kjær, A. L. (2016). Constructing achievement in the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY): A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique, 29(3), 525–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, A., & Semino, E. (2017). Healthcare professionals’ online use of violence metaphors for care at the end of life in the US: A corpus-based comparison with the UK. Corpora, 12(1), 55–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, S. (2010). Using automated semantic tagging in critical discourse analysis: A case study on Scottish independence from a Scottish nationalist perspective. Discourse & Society, 21(4), 405–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y. (2010). Discursive constructions around terrorism in the People’s Daily (China) and The Sun (UK) before and after 9.11: A corpus-based contrastive critical discourse analysis. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2015). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 23–61). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (2004). Critical approaches to discourse analysis in educational research. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 1–20). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). British Studies in Applied Linguistics, 12, 100–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Blackwell publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., & Jiang, J. (2014). Metaphor use in Chinese and US corporate mission statements: A cognitive sociolinguistic analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2014). Investigating the representation of migrants in the UK and Italian press: A cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(3), 368–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornborrow, J. (1999). Language and the media. In L. Thomas, W. Shân, I. Singh, J. S. Peccei, J. Thornborrow, & J. Jones (Eds.), Language, society and power: An introduction (pp. 56–73). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. John Benjamins Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 243–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 62–85). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessey, R. (2013). Language ideologies and discourses of national identity in Canadian newspapers: A cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse study. Doctoral dissertation, Queen Mary University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessey, R. (2015). Corpus approaches to language ideology. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The mass media’s political agenda-setting power: A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006299098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. (2013). A social constructionist analysis of the discourse of mental depression in British and Chinese news: A corpus-based study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2009). Divergent news representations of Lien Chan’s visit to China: A corpus-based lexical comparison between the China Post and the China Daily. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 19(2), 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Chen, S. Z. (2015). A corpus-based critical analysis of lexical choices in Sichuan earthquake by Chinese and American news media. Canadian Social Science, 11(7), 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about-a summary or its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–14). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2015). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–22). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. (2015). Olympism and the Beijing Olympic torch relay in the British and Chinese media discourses: A comparative study. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 32(3), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, S. Y., & Huang, Y. (2014). Aomen yu nei di xin weng yu pian chi hui cha yi de ji liang yan jiu [A quantitative study of the lexical differences in news discourses between Macau and Mainland]. Yu Yan Wen Zi Yin Yong, 5(2), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, J. (2007). The clash of rights: A critical analysis of news discourse on human rights in the United States and China. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., & Mihelj, S. (2012). Hong Kong identity and the press–politics dynamics: A corpus-assisted discourse study. Asian Journal of Communication, 22(5), 506–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. City University of Macau, Macau, China

    Yuxi Wu

Authors
  1. Yuxi Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wu, Y. (2023). News Discourse and Relevant Linguistic Studies. In: Media Representations of Macau’s Gaming Industry in Greater China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7724-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation