Skip to main content

Classification Algorithm for Predicting the Graduation Level: Case Study of e-Learning in Telkom University

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Sustainable Systems

Abstract

E-learning is one of the technologies used to support the learning process in university level. Telkom University with the university base on technology, Telkom University so intensively apply the learning using e-learning in order to become effective and efficient method. E-learning is used to reduce the cost and time spent learning in an offline class. With e-learning a review system can be done anywhere, because students do not need to come to the classroom to study. Simply by passing the Internet network can already attend the class. With the existing data in the e-learning system can be obtained some information by processing the existing data. This research will be predictions of student data contained in e-learning to determine the performance of algorithms C4.5, Naïve Bayes and Bayesian network, which will be used to determine what factors affect the level of graduation of students to a course. The process will go through several stages of data retrieval, preprocessing and classification, and the process will be done gradually to get the results of all the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Indrawan, I.: Meningkatkan mutu pendidikan melalui e-learning. J. Al-Afkar 3(2), 68–83 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yehuala, M.A.: Application of data mining techniques for student success and failure prediction. Int J. Sci. Tech. Res. (IJER) 4(4), 91–94 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kabakchieva, D.: Predicting student performance by using data mining methods for classification. Cybern. Inf. Technol. 13(1), 61–72 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamini, O., Ramakrishna, S.: A study on advantages of data mining classification techniques. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) 4(9), 969–972 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khalid, B., Abdelwahab, N.: A comparative study of various data mining techniques: statistics, decision trees and neural neworks. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Tech. Res. 5(3), 172–175 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sahu, H., Shrma, S., Gondhalakar, S.: A brief overview on data mining survey. Int. J. Comput. Technol. Electron. Eng. (IJCTEE) 1(3), 114–121 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ahlan, A.R., Lubis, M., Lubis, A.R.: Information security awareness at the knowledge-based institution: its antecedents and measures. Procedia Comput. Sci. 72, 361–373 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ismail, M., Ibrahim, M.M., Sanusi, Z.M., Nat, M.: Data mining in electronic commerce: benefits and challenges. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Syst. Sci. 8, 501–509 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V.: Introduction to data mining. Addison Wesley Publishing (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anggara, M.: Sistem pendukung keputusan penerimaan pegawai baru pada PT. Kanasritex Semarang. Skripsi, Fakultas Komputer, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patil, T.R.: Performance analysis of Naive Bayes and J48. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. 6(2), 256–261 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ashari, A., Paryudi, I., Tjoa, A.M.: Performance comparison between Naïve Bayes, decision tree and k-nearest neighbor in searching alternative design in an energy simulation tool. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 4(11), 33–39 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bouckaert, R.R.: Bayesian network classifiers in weka for version 3–5–7. The University of Waikato (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Borgelt, C., Kruse, R.: Graphical models: methods for data analysis and mining. Wiley, Chichester, UK (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ravi, K., Ravi, V.: A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: tasks, approaches and applications. Knowl. Based Syst. 89, 14–46 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vinodhini, G., Chandrasekaran, R.M.: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining: a survey. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Software Eng. 2(6) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seerat, B., Azam, F.: Opinion mining: issues and challenges (a survey). Int. J. Comput. Appl. 49(7), 42–51 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SentiWordNET 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 2200–2204 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., Stede, M.: Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 37(2) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cambria, E., Speer, R., Havasi, C., Hussain, A.: SenticNet: a publicly available semantic resource for opinion mining. In: Commonsense knowledge: papers from the AAAI fall symposium (FS-10–02), pp. 14–18 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smeureanu, I., Bucur, C.: Applying supervised opinion mining techniques on online user reviews. Informatica Economica 16(2/2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 5(1) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schnattinger, K., Walterscheid, H.: The opinion mining architecture OMA. In: Working & discussion paper, DHBW (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sidorov, G., Miranda-Jimenez, S., Viveros-Jimenez, F., Gelbukh, A., Castro-Sanchez, N., Velasquez, F., Diaz-Rangle, I., Guarez-Guerra, S., Trevino, A., Gordon, J.: Empirical study of machine learning based approach for opinion mining in tweets. In: Proceedings of the 11th Mexican international conference on advances in artificial intelligence, vol. I, pp. 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, L., Ghosh, R., Dekhil, M., Hsu, M., Liu, B.: Combining lexicon-based and learning-based methods for twitter sentiment analysis. Tech. Rep. HPL-2011–89. HP Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Park, A., and P. Paroubek.: Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on language resources and evaluation

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retrieval 2(1–2)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D.M.: Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product review. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 519–528. ACM-USA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lubis, A.R., Lubis, M., Listriani, D.: Big data forecasting applied nearest neighbor method. In: International conference on sustainable engineering and creative computing (ICSECC) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lubis, M., Lubis, A.R., Lubis, B.,Lubis, A.: Incremental innovation towards business performance: data management challenges in healthcare industry in Indonesia. In: International conference on industrial, electrical and electronics (ICIEE) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hakim, L., Kusumasari, T.F., Lubis, M.: Text mining of UU-ITE implementation in Indonesia. In: Journal of physics: conference series 1007(1) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dimitoglou, G., Adams, J., Jim, C.M.: Comparison of the C4.5 and a Naïve Bayes classifier for the prediction of lung cancer survivability. In: Journal of computing 4(8) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Domingos, P.M., Pazzani, M.J.: Beyond independence: conditions for the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier. In: Proceedings of ICML, pp. 105–112 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Frank, E., Trigg, L., Holmes, G., Witten, I.H.: Naïve Bayes for regression. Mach. Learn. 41(1), 5–25 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, H.: The optimality of Naïve Bayes. In: Proceedings of the Florida artificial intelligence research society conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muharman Lubis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hasibuan, M.A., Andreswari, R., Lubis, M., Perdana, F., Fakhrurroja, H. (2023). Classification Algorithm for Predicting the Graduation Level: Case Study of e-Learning in Telkom University. In: Nagar, A.K., Singh Jat, D., Mishra, D.K., Joshi, A. (eds) Intelligent Sustainable Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 578. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7660-5_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics