Skip to main content
  • 93 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As distinct from the idea of political technologies developed by Michel Foucault.

References

  • Adams, K. (1999). Progressive politics and the training of America’s persuaders. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anohin, M. G. (2008). Sovremenniye tecnologii effectivnoi politiki. [Modern technologies of effective politics]. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austermühl, F. (2014). The great American scaffold: Intertextuality and identity in American presidential discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, E. W., & Pinkleton, B. E. (2015). Strategic public relations management: Planning and managing effective communication campaigns. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, E. J., & Graham, M. W. (2013). Political public relations and the promotion of participatory, transparent government through social media. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(4), 274–291. https://dx.doi.org/rhetpublaffa.17.2.0374

  • Berger, B. K. (1999). The Halcion affair: Public relations and the construction of ideological world view. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brissenden, J., & Moloney, K. (2005). Political PR in the 2005 UK general election: Winning and losing, with a little help from spin. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(9–10), 1005–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, P. E. (1979). Political language and rhetoric. University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crivelli, C., & Fridlund, A. J. (2018). Facial displays are tools for social influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(5), 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davyborec, E. N. (2015). “Prjamaja linija prezidenta s narodom” kak social’no-politicheskaja tehnologija. [“Direct line with the President” as socio-political technology]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, 4(372), 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vreese, C. H., & Elenbaas, M. (2009). Spin doctors in the spotlight: Effects of strategic press and publicity coverage on perceptions of political PR. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 294–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgley, A. (2009). Manufacturing consistency: Social science, rhetoric and Chomsky’s critique. Westminster Papers in Communication & Culture, 6(2), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1982). Emotion in the human face (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(2), 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164(3875), 86–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshbaugh-Soha, M., & Peake, J. S. (2011). Breaking through the noise: Presidential leadership, public opinion, and the news media. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., Reinemann, C., & Fan, D. (2000). Spin doctoring in British and German election campaigns: How the press is being confronted with a new quality of political PR. European Journal of Communication, 15(2), 209–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., Reinemann, C., & Fan, D. (2001). Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany: Metacommunication about media manipulation. Harvard International Journal of Press/politics, 6(1), 16–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewen, S. (1996). PR!: A social history of spin. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A. (2014). ‘What’s the problem?’: Political theory, rhetoric and problem-setting. In M. Zalewski & J. Barry (Eds.), Intervening in Northern Ireland: Critically re-thinking the representations of the conflict (pp. 75–92). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich, R., & Rüdiger, B. (2006). Framing political public relations: Measuring success of political communication strategies in Germany. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilova, M. V. (2018). Torzhestvennaja ceremonija vstuplenija v dolzhnost’ Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii kak kommunikativnoe sobytie. [Inauguration of the President of Russian federation as a communication event]. Politicheskaja lingvistika, 4(70), 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genard, G. (2011). Politics and the art of the performance: A challenge to political campaigns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazier, R. A., & Boydstun, A. E. (2012). The president, the press, and the war: A tale of two framing agendas. Political Communication, 29(4), 428–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J. (1994). What’s right (and wrong) about left media criticism? Herman and Chomsky’s propaganda model. Sociological Forum, 9(1), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grishin, O. E. (2014). Politicheskie tehnologii v XXI veke: Sushhnost’, spektr, harakter. [Political technologies in XXI sentury: Nature, range, character]. PolitBook, 2, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunder, M. (2011). A metapsychological exploration of the role of popular media in engineering public belief on planning issues. Planning Theory, 10(4), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. P. (1987). Some footnotes on the role of public communication in incumbent politics. Annals of the International Communication Association, 10(1), 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K. (2011). Visual persuasion in George W. Bush’s presidency: Cowboy imagery in public discourse. Congress & the Presidency, 38(3), 322–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holladay, S., & Coombs, W. (1994). Speaking of visions and visions being spoken. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318994008002002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. (2013). Government websites and social media’s influence on government-public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., & Buskqvist, U. (2013). Political public relations on the Net: A relationship management perspective. Public Relations Journal, 7(4), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiousis, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2010). The white house and public relations: Examining the linkages between presidential communications and public opinion. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiousis, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2011). Political public relations research in the future. In J. Strömbäck & S. Kiousis (Eds.), Political public relations. Principles and applications (pp. 314–323). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiousis, S., Strömbäck, J., & McDevitt, M. (2015). Influence of issue decision salience on vote choice: Linking agenda setting, priming, and issue ownership. International Journal of Communication, 9(22), 3347–3368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolomijcev, E. S. (2014). Rossijskij federalizm v kontekste obespechenija territorial’noj celostnosti gosudarstva: Politicheskie tehnologii reform. [Russina federalism in the context of territorial integrity: Political technologies of reforms]. Teorija i Praktika Obshhestvennogo Razvitija, 2, 327–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, D. (2014). The virtues of participation without power: Campaigns, party networks, and the ends of politics. The Sociological Quarterly, 55(3), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Etang, J. (2006). Public relations and sport in promotional culture. Public Relations Review, 32(4), 386–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Etang, J. (2008). Writing PR history: Issues, methods and politics. Journal of Communication Management, 12(4), 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkin, E., & Suchkov, E. (2008). Politicheskie tekhnologii [Political technologies]. Russkaya Panorama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, D. K. (2011). Political public relations: Remembering its roots and classics. In J. Strömbäck & S. Kiousis (Eds.), Political public relations. Principles and applications (pp. 42–62). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (2015). Welcome to the social media election. The Hill. http://thehill.com/policy/technology/251185-welcome-to-the-social-media-election

  • McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H. (2014). New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society, 17(6), 781–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNair, B. (2004). PR must die: Spin, anti-spin and political public relations in the UK, 1997–2004. Journalism Studies, 5(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670042000246089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehdiev, Je. T. & Guliev, I. A. (2016). Ponjatie «mjagkoj sily» kak instrumenta global’nyh politicheskihtehnologij. [“Soft power” as an instrument of global political technologies]. Juvenis scientia, 3, 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnikova, T. S. (2010). Propagnada kak tehnologiya politicheskogo manipulirovaniya. [Propaganda as a technique of political manipulation]. Vlast, 8, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyen, M., & Scheu, A. (2011). The role of external broadcasting in a closed political system: A case study of the German post-war states. Global Media and Communication, 7(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766511410219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., Rosis, F. D., & Poggi, I. (2006). Emotional and non-emotional persuasion. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 20(10), 849–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Dinan, W. (2000). The rise of the PR industry in Britain, 1979–1998. European Journal of Communication, 15(1), 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, K., & Colmer, R. (2001). Does political PR enhance or trivialise democracy? The UK general election 2001 as contest between presentation and substance. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(9–10), 957–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momoc, A. (2011). The blog–political PR tool in the 2009 presidential electoral campaign. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Professional Communication and Translation Studies, 4(1–2), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesterchuk, O. A. (2015). Tradicionnye i innovacionnye politicheskie tehnologii v informacionno-psihologicheskom protivoborstve. [Traditional and innovative technologies in info-political confrontation]. PolitBook, 2, 84–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleinik, A. N. (2015a). The invisible hand of power: An economic theory of gate keeping. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oleinik, A. N. (2015b). The language of power: A content analysis of presidential addresses in North America and the former Soviet Union, 1993–2012. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2015(236), 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, L. C., Finnegan, C. A., & Hope, D. S. (2008). Visual rhetoric: A reader in communication and American culture. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, D. L. (2015). Online political public relations and trust: Source and interactivity effects in the 2012 US presidential campaign. Public Relations Review, 41(5), 801–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry-Giles, T. (2010). Resisting a “treacherous piety”: Issues, images, and public policy deliberation in presidential campaigns. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 13(1), 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervushina, E. O. (2017). Vizual’nyj obraz El’cina v obshhestvenno-politicheskom diskurse. 1985–2000 gg. [Visual image of Yeltsin in political discourse 1985–2000]. (Doctoral dissertation). South Ural State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2012). Social media and political engagement. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 19, 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, A. (2015). Building intimacy through linguistic choices, text structure and voices in political discourse. Language & Communication, 43, 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, C., & Somerville, I. (2013). Power-sharing and political public relations: Government-press relationships in Northern Ireland’s developing democratic institutions. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffer, A. J., Taylor, M., & Yang, A. (2013). Political public relations in advocacy: Building online influence and social capital. Public Relations Journal, 7(4), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomatin, A. Ju. (2009). Politicheskij marketing kak osnova politicheskih tehnologij i PR- kampanij v postmodernizirujushhemsja obshhestve. [Political marketing as a basis for political technologies and PR campaigns in postmodernising society] Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Obshhestvennye nauki, 2, 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, C. (2014). Cognitive categorization and prototypicality as persuasive strategies: Presidential rhetoric in the USA. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(2), 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum-Bradley, N. (2007). Constructing and de-constructing the ACP group: Actors, strategies and consequences for development. Geopolitics, 12(4), 635–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A. (2014). Money, power, and elections: How campaign finance reform subverts American democracy. LSU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolova, E. P. (2011). Tehnologii vnedrenija ideologij v massovoe soznanie [Technologies of introduction of ideology into collective consciousness]. Upravlencheskoe Konsul’tirovanie, 2, 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloviev, A. I. (2000a). Politologia: politicheskaya teoriya, politicheskie tehnologii. [Political sience: Political theory and political technologies]. Aspect Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloviev, A. I. (2000b). Tehnologii v politike i politicheskom upravlenii. [Technologies in politics and political governance]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo RAGS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloviev, A. I. (2014). Politologia: politicheskaya teoriya, politicheskie tehnologii. [Political sience: Political theory and political technologies] (2ed). ZAO Izdatelstvo “Aspect Press”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (Eds.). (2011). Political public relations: Principles and applications. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2013). Political public relations: Old practice, new theory-building. Public Relations Journal, 7(4), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2014). Strategic political communication in election campaigns. Political Communication, 18, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, S. (2009). Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 216–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2006). Public relations theory and practice in nation. In R. Heath, C. Botan, & V. Hazelton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 299–311). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedesco, J. C. (2011). Political information efficacy and Internet effects in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 703–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triadafilopoulos, T. (1999). Politics, speech, and the art of persuasion: Toward an Aristotelian conception of the public sphere. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 741–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. K., Motion, J., & Roper, J. (2006). From propaganda to discourse (and back again): Truth, power, the public interest and public relations. In J. L’Etang & M. Pieczka (Eds.), Public relations: Critical debates and contemporary practice (pp. 7–21). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., & Somerville, L. (2008a). Business ethics, public relations and corporate social responsibility. The Public Relations Handbook. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., & Somerville, I. (2008b). Public relations, politics and the media. In A. Theaker (Ed.), The public relations handbook (pp. 31–50). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xifra, J., & Girona, R. (2012). Frank Capra’s “why we fight" and film documentary discourse in public relations. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoch, L. M., & Molleda, J. C. (2006). Building a theoretical model of media relations using framing, information subsidies, and agenda-building. In R. Heath, C. Botan, & V. Hazelton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 279–309). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gayoso, A. (2023). Introduction. In: Understanding Political Public Relations Techniques. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7599-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics