Abstract
If there is one thing that can characterize the ethnographic approach, it is that social intimacy rather than social distancing is crucial to the process. Although we were to minimize physical gatherings, meet in small groups, and remain at a distance from each other during the COVID-19 pandemic, what were the possibilities of conducting ethnography with populations facing precarious contexts during and beyond COVID-19?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acedera, K. A., & Yeoh, B. S. (2018). Facebook, long-distance marriages, and the mediation of intimacies. International Journal of Communication, 12, 4123–4142.
Agadjanian, V., & Zotova, N. (2012). Sampling and surveying hard-to-reach populations for demographic research: A study of female labor migrants in Moscow. Russia. Demographic Research, 26(5), 131–150.
Amit, V. (1999). Constructing the field: Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. Routledge.
Anderson, B. (2016). Worker, helper, auntie, maid? working conditions and attitudes experienced by migrant domestic workers in Thailand and Malaysia. International Labour Organization.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
Atkinson, A. (2015). For ethnography. SAGE Publications.
Babis, D. (2021). Digital mourning on Facebook: The case of Filipino migrant worker live-in caregivers in Israel. Media, Culture & Society, 43(3), 397–410.
Baey, G., & Yeoh, B. S. (2015). Migration and precarious work: Negotiating debt, employment, and livelihood strategies amongst Bangladeshi migrant men working in Singapore’s construction industry. Migrating Out of Poverty Working Paper, 26.
Bailey, L., & Williams, S. J. (2018). The ethical challenges of researching refugee education. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 359–370.
Baldassar, L., Nedelcu, M., Merla, L., & Wilding, R. (2016). ICT-based co-presence in transnational families and communities: Challenging the premise of face-to-face proximity in sustaining relationships. Global Networks, 16, 133–144.
Bassett, C. (1997). Virtually gendered: Life in an on-line world. In K. Gelder & S. Thornton (Eds.), The subcultures reader (pp. 537–550). Routledge.
Beauchemin, C., & Gonzalez-Ferrer, A. (2011). Sampling international migrants with origin-based snowballing method: New evidence on biases and limitations. Demographic Research, 25(3), 103–134.
Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of methods. Princeton.
Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 181–199.
Cabalquinto, E. C. (2018). Ambivalent intimacies: Entangled pains and gains through Facebook use in transnational family life. In A. S. Dobson, B. Robards, & N. Carah (Eds.), Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media (pp. 247–263). Palgrave Macmillan.
Carling, J., Erdal, M. B., & Ezzati, R. T. (2014). Beyond the insider–outsider divide in migration research. Migration Studies, 2, 36–54.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell.
Charmaz, K. (2001). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 675–694). SAGE Publishing.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
Chung, R. Y. N., Liao, T. F., & Fong, E. (2020). Data collection for migrant live-in domestic workers: A three-stage cluster sampling method. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(6), 709–721.
Clark, A. (2006). Anonymising research data. ESRC national centre for research methods, real life methods working paper series. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/480/1/0706_anonymising_research_data.pdf
Clifford, J. (1992). Travelling cultures. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 96–116). Routledge.
Codagnone, C., &Kluzer, S. (2011). ICT for the social and economic integration of migrants into Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Dutta, M. J. (2008). Communicating health: A culture-centered approach. Polity.
Dutta, M. J., & Pal, M. (2011). Public relations and marginalization in a global context: A postcolonial critique.
Dutta, M. J. (2014). A culture-centered approach to listening: Voices of social change. International Journal of Listening, 28(2), 67–81.
Dutta, M. J., Mandal, I., Kaur, S., Pitaloka, D., Pandi, A., Tan, N., Bashir, M., Prasad, M., Sun, K., Thaker, J., Comer, S., Zapata, D., Tan, E. L., Luk, P., Lijun, L., Rahman, A., Etchart, J., Falnikar, A., Ganchoudhuri, S., …, Sastr, S. (2016). Culture-centered method: The nuts and bolts of co-creating communication infrastructures of listening in communities. CARE White Paper Series, 2. Retrieved from http://www.care-cca.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Culture-Centered_Method_The_nuts_and_bol.pdf
Dutta, M. J. (2020). COVID-19, authoritarian neoliberalism, and precarious migrant work in Singapore: Structural violence and communicative inequality. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 58.
Dutta, M. J. (2021). Singapore’s extreme neoliberalism and the COVID outbreak: Culturally centering voices of low-wage migrant workers. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(10), 1302–1322.
Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Sage.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnote (2nd ed). The University of Chicago Press.
Farbeblum, B., Berg, L., & Kintominas, A. (2018). Transformative technology for migrant workers: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. Open Society Foundations. https://www.oecd.org/countries/bangladesh/adbi-book-labor-migration-asia-impacts-covid-19-crisis-post-pandemic-future.pdf
Fête, M., Aho, J., Benoit, M., Cloos, P. & Ridde, V. (2019). Barriers and recruitment strategies for precarious status migrants in Montreal, Canada. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19 (41), 1–14.
Freidenberg, J., Mulvihill, M., & Caraballo, L. R. (1993). From ethnography to survey: Some methodological issues in research on health seeking in East Harlem. Human Organization, 52(2), 151–161.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Lytras, M. D. (2012). Informal learning in work environments: Training with the Social Web in the workplace. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(8), 753–755.
Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 36(3), 217–223.
Gobo, G. (2008). Ethnographic interviewing. In G. Gobo (Ed.), Doing ethnography (pp. 190–200). Sage.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press.
Gu, C. J. (2019). Interviewing immigrants and refugees: Reflexive engagement with research subjects. In S. J. Gold and S. J. Nawyn (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of migration studies (2nd ed., pp. 565–581).
Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Beyond “culture”: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. In A. Gupta & J. Ferguson (Eds.), Culture, power, place: Explorations in critical anthropology (pp. 33–51). Duke University Press.
Hamid, W., & Tutt, D. (2019). “Thrown away like a banana leaf”: Precarity of labour and precarity of place for Tamil migrant construction workers in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 37(9), 513–536.
Hannerz, U. (1992). The global ecumene as a network of networks. In A. Kuper (Ed.), Conceptualizing society (pp. 34–56). Routledge.
Head, E. (2009). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 335–344.
Heckathorn, D. D. (2007). Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: Analyzing continuous variables and controlling for differential recruitment. Sociological Methodology, 37, 151–207.
Hennida, C., Aryani, K., & Kinasih, S. E. (2021). The Use of Social Media Among Indonesia’s Migrant Workers. Hennida, 34(1), 13–22.
Hewitt, S., Mills, J., Hoare, K., & Sheridan, N. (2022, September). Grounded Theory Method and Symbolic Interactionism: Freedom of Conceptualization and the Importance of Context in Research. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 23, No. 3). DEU.
Hjorth, L., Horst, H. A., Galloway, A., & Bell, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge companion to digital ethnography (pp. 21–28). Routledge.
Holmes, S. M. (2013). “Is it worth risking your life?”: Ethnography, risk and death on the U.S.-Mexico border. Social Science & Medicine, 99, 153–161.
Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (Eds.). (2020). Digital anthropology. Routledge.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2019). Mobile Women and Mobile Phones: Women Migrant Workers’ Use of Information and Communication Technologies in ASEAN. International Labour Organization.
Janghorban, R., Roudsari R. L., & Taghipour A. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Health and Well-being, 9(24152), 1–3.
Kaur-Gill, S., Qin-Liang, Y., & Hassan, S. (2021). Negotiating mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Performing migrant domestic work in contentious conditions. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(10), 1406–1425.
Kaur-Gill, S. (2022). The Cultural Customization of TikTok: Subaltern Migrant Workers and their Digital Cultures. Media International Australia.
Leurs, K., & Smets, K. (2018). Five questions for digital migration studies: Learning from digital connectivity and forced migration in (to) Europe. Social Media+ Society,4(1), 2056305118764425.
Leurs, K., & Prabhakar, M. (2018). Doing digital migration studies: Methodological considerations for an emerging research focus. In Qualitative research in European migration studies (pp. 247–266). Springer.
Le Duc, A. (2016). The role of social media in community building for illegal Vietnamese migrant workers in Thailand. Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 10(1), 4–21.
Long, N. J. (2020). Lockdown anthropology and online surveys: Unprecedented methods for unprecedented times. Studies in Indian Politics, 8(2), 294–297.
Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. University of Chicago Press.
Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2017). Research Ethics in Context: Decision-Making in Digital Research. In M. T. Schäfer & K. van Es (Eds.), The datafied society: Studying culture through data (pp. 201–209). Amsterdam University Press.
McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2009). The ethics of internet research: A rhetorical, case-based process (Vol. 59). Peter Lang.
Merli, M. G., Verdery, A., Mouw, T., & Li, J. (2016). Sampling migrants from their social networks: The demography and social organization of Chinese migrant workers in Dar es Salaam. Tanzania. Migration Studies, 4(2), 182–214.
Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Berg.
Mintarsih, A. R. (2019). Voice of Singapore’s invisible hands: Indonesian migrant domestic workers and poems on home and family. Migration, Mobility and Displacement, 4(1), 1–139.
Morrow, V. (2009). The ethics of social research with children and families in young lives: practical experiences (Working Paper No. 53, Young Lives).
Naheswari, S.M., & Oh, T. (2021, July 17). The Big Read: Grappling with isolation, migrant workers in dorms long for a return to the wider community. Channel News Asia. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/big-read-grappling-isolation-migrant-workers-dorms-long-return-wider-community-2082326
Napier-Moore, R., & Sheill, K. (2016). High rise, low pay: Experiences of migrant women in the Thai construction sector. International Labour Organization.
Nedelcu, M. (2018). Digital Diasporas. In R. Cohen & C. Fischer (Eds.), Handbook of diaspora studies (pp. 241–250). Routledge.
Ngo, B., & Bigelow., M. & Lee, S.J. (2014). Introduction to the special issue: What does it mean to do ethical and engaged research with immigrant communities? Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 8(1), 1–6.
O’Connor, B. H. (2019). ‘Everything went boom’: Kinship narratives of Transfronterizo University students. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 24(1), 242–262.
Ong, A., & D. Nonini, eds. (1997). Ungrounded empires: The cultural politics of modern Chinese transnationalism. Routledge.
Pearce, L. D. (2002). Integrating survey and ethnographic methods for systematic anomalous case analysis. Sociological Methodology, 32(1), 103–132.
Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography (2nd ed). Sage.
Pink, S. (2016). Digital ethnography. Innovative methods in media and communication research (pp.161–165).
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.
Porter, J. E., & McKee, H. A. (2009). The ethics of internet research: A rhetorical, case-based process. Peter Lang Publishing.
Potzschke, S., & Braun, M. (2017). Migrant sampling using Facebook advertisements: A case study of Polish migrants in four European countries. Social Science Computer Review, 35(5), 633–653.
Przybylski, L. (2020). Hybrid ethnography: Online, offline, and in between. Sage.
Reichel, D., Siegel, M., & Tudela, J. C. (2015). ICT for the employability and integration of immigrants in the European Union: A qualitative analysis of a survey in Bulgaria, the Netherlands and Spain (JRC Working Papers JRC93966). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
Roudy-Fraser, G. (2021). Use of digital technology in the recruitment of migrant workers. International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/fairrecruitment/publications/WCMS_831814/lang--en/index.html
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.
Schensul, S., Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires. In M. D. LeCompte & J. J. Schensul (Eds.), Ethnographer’s toolkit (Vol. 2). Sage.
Sholihyn, I. (2020, April 8). Migrant workers in Singapore use TikTok to show what it's like in Covid-19 quarantine. AsiaOne.. https://www.asiaone.com/digital/migrant-workers-singapore-use-tiktok-show-what-its-covid-19-quarantine
Sieber, S. D. (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1335–1359.
Snodgrass, J. G., Lacy, M. G., Denagh, H. J. F., Batchelder, G., Eisenhower, S., & Thompson, R. S. (2016). Culture and the jitters: Guild affiliation and online gaming eustress/distress. Ethos, 44(1), 50–78.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Rinehart and Winston.
Strathern, M. (1996). Cutting the network. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2(3), 517–535.
Tee, Z. (2020). Worker's Facebook page with collated news has over 51,600 followers. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/workers-facebook-page-with-collated-news-has-over-51600-followers
Thachil, T. (2018). Improving surveys through ethnography: Insights from India’s urban periphery. St Comp Int Dev, 53, 281–299.
Thompson, E. C. (2009). Mobile phones, communities and social networks among foreign workers in Singapore. Global Networks, 9(3), 359–380.
Thompson, A., Stringfellow, L., Maclean, M., & Nazzal, A. (2021). Ethical considerations and challenges for using digital ethnography to research vulnerable populations. Journal of Business Research, 124, 676–683.
Tyldum, G. (2021). Surveying migrant populations with respondent-driven sampling: Experiences from surveys of east-west migration in Europe. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(3), 341–353.
Verma, M. (2021, September 16). India and Singapore are speeding up cross-borders remittances and retail trades. Quartz India. https://qz.com/india/2059327/why-are-india-and-singapore-linking-fast-payment-systems/
Von Benzon, N. R. (2019). Informed consent and secondary data: Reflections on the use of mothers’ blogs in social media research. Area, 51(1), 182–189.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Free Press.
Wijaya, S. W., Watson, J., & Bruce, C. (2018). Understanding empowerment in social media context: Lessons from Indonesian migrant domestic workers. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 14(2), 172–195.
Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 387–401.
Yea, S. (2020). Paved with good intentions? Human trafficking and the anti-trafficking movement in Singapore. Palgrave Macmillan.
Young, A. A. (2006). The minds of marginalized black men: Making sense of mobility, opportunity, and future life chances. Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qin-Liang, Y., Kaur-Gill, S., Hassan, S. (2023). Conducting Digital Ethnography with Precarious Migrant Workers in a Pandemic. In: Kaur-Gill, S., Dutta, M.J. (eds) Migrants and the COVID-19 Pandemic . Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7384-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7384-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7383-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7384-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)