Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Need for an Integrated Conflict Sensitivity Framework in Development Assistance that Contributes to Peaceful and Sustainable Post-conflict Societies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Approaches to Peace and Sustainability

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Over the last three decades, studies on conflict sensitivity largely focused on organizational, institutional, technical, and capacity barriers by ignoring the political barriers. Likewise, existing conflict sensitivity approaches, such as ‘Do No Harm’, ‘Peace and Conflict Impact Assessment’ have failed to dig beneath the post-conflict contexts and see the underlying fragilities that can potentially lead to reoccurrence of conflict. These fragilities are diverse, dynamic, and constantly emerging. Bad governance, Climate change impact, stalled transitional justice or food insecurity provide some examples, which continue to fuel nonviolent conflicts and disrupt the path to sustainable peace. As a result, the successful application of conflict sensitivity by development donors in post-conflict development has brought mixed results. In this context, this study proposes Integrated Conflict Sensitivity Framework-ICSF, which is informed by the political settlement framework to critique, interrogate, and reconceptualize conflict sensitivity in post-conflict development. Such politically informed conflict sensitive approach understands as well as analyses how donors should understand the formal political system as well as informal unarticulated political processes that determine the political and economic behaviors of a post-conflict state. Finally, ICSF advocates for inclusive structures, resources distribution and decision-making, which are crucial to peacebuilding, legitimacy, and development in post-conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The concept of political settlement mapping is borrowed from Parks and Cole (2010) to inform Integrated Conflict Sensitive Framework (ICSF).

References

  • Abrahams D (2020) Land is now the biggest gun: climate change and conflict in Karamoja, Uganda. Clim Dev 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2020.1862740

  • Addison T, Mansoob Murshed S (2005) Post-conflict reconstruction in Africa: some analytical issues. In: Post-conflict economies in Africa. Springer, pp 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari TP, Thapa FB, Tamrakar S, Magar PB, Hagen-Zanker J, Babajanian B (2014) How does social protection contribute to social inclusion in Nepal. Evidence from the child grant in the Karnali region. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed ZS (2011) Peace and conflict impact assessment (PCIA): lessons from Pakistan. Peace Conflict Rev 5(2):12–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed ZS (2015) Development and conflict sensitivity: a case study of the application of PCIA in Pakistan. Asian J Peacebuild 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Assa J (2017) Integrating peacebuilding and sustainable development policies in least developed countries. J Peacebuild Dev 12(1):103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AusAid (2011) Framework for working in fragile and conflict-affected states. Guidance for staff, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker B (2009) Security in post-conflict Africa: the role of nonstate policing. CRC

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat S, Chard M (2002) Theories, rhetoric and practice: recovering the capacities of war-torn societies. Third World Q 23(5):817–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659022000028639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbolet A, Goldwyn R, Groenewald H, Sherriff A (2005) The utility and dilemmas of conflict sensitivity. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogati S, Cox FD, Karki S, Sisk TD (2017) Nepal: identity politics in a turbulent transition. In: Peacebuilding in deeply divided societies. Springer, pp 175–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff DW (2005) Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Adm Dev 25(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Langer A, Stewart F (2008). A Typology of Post-Conflict Environments: An Overview. Crise Working Paper No. 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Goldwyn R, Groenewald H, McGregor J (2009) Conflict sensitivity consortium benchmarking paper. Working Draft, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Langer A, Stewart F (2011) A typology of post-conflict environments. CRPD Working Paper 1:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush K (1998) A measure of peace: peace and conflict impact assessment (PCIA) of development projects in conflict zones. D-322-Bush_Kenneth-283

    Google Scholar 

  • Call CT (2012) Why peace fails: the causes and prevention of civil war recurrence: Georgetown University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers T, De Gramont D (2013) Development aid confronts politics: the almost revolution. Brookings Institution Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillejo C (2014) Promoting inclusion in political settlements: a priority for international actors. Report, Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier P, Hoeffler A, Söderbom M (2008) Post-conflict risks. J Peace Res 45(4):461–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343308091356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Greiff P (2009) Artuculating the links between transitional justice and development: justice and social integration. In De Greiff P, Duthie R (eds) Transitional justice and development: making connections. Social Science Research Council, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Detges A, Klingenfeld D, König C, Pohl B, Rüttinger L, Schewe J, Sedova B, Vivekananda J (2020) 10 Insights on climate impacts and peace. Adelphi Research Gemeinnützige GmbH

    Google Scholar 

  • DFAT (2022) Health security in Timor-Leste. https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/timor-leste/development-assistance/health-security-in-timor-leste

  • Di John J, Putzel J (2009) Political settlements: issues paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich S (2013) Bypass or engage? Explaining donor delivery tactics in foreign aid allocation. Int Stud Quart 57(4):698–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douma P (2006) Poverty, relative deprivation and political exclusion as drivers of violent conflict in Sub Saharan Africa. ISYP J Sci World Aff 2(2):59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucza K (2017) Social inclusion in the post-conflict state of Nepal: donor practice and the political settlement. Glob Soc Policy 17(1):62–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M, Hulme D (1996) Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Dev 24(6):961–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyal G, Szelényi I, Szelényi I, Townsley ER (1998) Making capitalism without capitalists: Class formation and elite struggles in post-communist. Verso, Central Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghali BB (1992) An agenda for peace, preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping. In: Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to the statement adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinch S, DeRouen Jr K (2014) In it for the long haul? Post-conflict statebuilding, peacebuilding, and the good governance agenda in Timor-Leste. Public Adm Dev 34(2):96–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1679

  • Goldfinch S, DeRouen Jr K, Pospieszna P (2013) Flying blind? Evidence for good governance public management reform agendas, implementation and outcomes in low income countries. Public Adm Dev 33(1):50–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldwyn R, Chigas D (2013) Monitoring and evaluating conflict sensitivity: methodological challenges and practical solutions. Access: http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/M-files/CCRVI/CCVRI-Monitoring-and-evaluating-conflict-sensitivity-challenges-and-solutions.pdf

  • Greeley M (2007) Aid that works: successful development in fragile states. World Bank Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm S, Weiffen B (2018) Domestic elites and external actors in post-conflict democratisation: mapping interactions and their impact. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullette D, Rosenberg D (2015) Not just another box to tick: conflict-sensitivity methods and the role of research in development programming. Dev Policy Rev 33(6):703–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider H (2014) Conflict sensitivity: topic guide. GSDRC, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider H (2017) Breaking the cycle of violence: applying conflict sensitivity to transitional justice. Confl Secur Dev 17(4):333–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2017.1337420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen D, Lonergan SC (2012) Assessing and restoring natural resources in post-conflict peacebuilding. Earthscan, Abingdon, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • JICA (2002) Research study on peacebuilding

    Google Scholar 

  • JICA (2006) Handbook for transition assistance

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones B, Elgin-Cossart M, Esberg J (2012) Pathways out of fragility: the case for a research agenda on inclusive political settlements in fragile states. Center on International Cooperation, New York University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jütersonke OC, Kartas M, Dauner I, Spurk C (2010) Peace and conflict impact assessment (PCIA). Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Madagascar

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahl CH (1998) Population growth, environmental degradation, and state-sponsored violence: the case of Kenya, 1991–1993. Int Secur 23(2):80–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan M (2010) Political settlements and the governance of growth-enhancing institutions

    Google Scholar 

  • Koubi V (2019) Climate change and conflict. Annu Rev Polit Sci 22(1):343–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampe F (2017) Toward sustainable peace: a new research agenda for post-conflict natural resource management. Glob Environ Polit 17(4):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampe F, Gignoux S (2018) Water service provision and peacebuilding in East Timor: exploring the socioecological determinants for sustaining peace. J Intervention Statebuilding 12(2):185–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2018.1466945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampe F (2014) Climate change mitigation and political legitimacy in post-conflict settings. ISA’s 55th Annual convention spaces and places geopolitics in an era of globalization March 26th–29th, 2014, Toronto, Canada, 26th–29th, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampe F, Sherman J (2020) The peacebuilding commission and climate-related security risks: a more favourable political environment

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruk ME, Freedman LP, Anglin GA, Waldman RJ (2010) Rebuilding health systems to improve health and promote statebuilding in post-conflict countries: a theoretical framework and research agenda. Soc Sci Med 70(1):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambourne W (2008) Towards sustainable peace and development in Sierra Leone: civil society and the peacebuilding commission. J Peacebuild Dev 4(2):47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws E (2012) Political settlements, elite pacts, and governments of national unity: a conceptual study. Background Paper 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Leftwich A (2007) Drivers of change: refining the analytical framework to understand the politics of the places we work: notes of guidance for DFID offices. Department of Politics, University of York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt M (2002) Providing aid agencies with tools for conflict-sensitive practice: lessons learned from peace and conflict impact assessment (PCIA). J Peacebuild Dev 1(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann S (2008) Do inclusive elite bargains matter? A research framework for understanding the causes of civil war in Sub-Saharan Africa. Crisis States Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud M (2018) The Environment as a Factor in Small Wars. Small Wars & Insurgencies 29(2):245–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menocal R (2017) Political settlements and the politics of transformation: where do ‘inclusive institutions’ come from? J Int Dev 29(5):559–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modvig J, Pagaduan-Lopez J, Rodenburg J, Salud CMD, Cabigon RV, Panelo CIA (2000) Torture and trauma in post-conflict East Timor. Lancet 356(9243):1763

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey A (2020) COVID-19 and conflict sensitivity

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosello B, Ruttinger L (2019) Linking adaptation and peacebuilding: lesson learned and the way forward

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC, Wallis JJ, Weingast BR (2009) Violence and social orders: a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyborg I, Nawab B, Khan K, Ali J (2012) Rural development in Swat, Pakistan: understanding food and livelihood security in post conflict contexts. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Helping prevent violent conflict

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohiorhenuan JFE (2008) Post-conflict economic recovery: enabling local ingenuity. United Nations Development Library

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz T (2005) Peace and conflict sensitivity in international cooperation: an introductory overview. Int Politik Gesellschaft 4(2005):63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks T, Cole W (2010) Political settlements: implications for international development policy and practice. Occasional paper 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavignani E (2005) Health service delivery in post-conflict states. In: Third meeting of the high level forum on health MDGs

    Google Scholar 

  • Pospisil J, Menocal AR (2017) Why political settlements matter: navigating inclusion in processes of institutional transformation. J Int Dev 29(5):551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh M (2011) Local agency and political economies of peacebuilding. Stud Ethn Natl 11(2):308–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratner BD, Meinzen-Dick R, Hellin J, Mapedza E, Unruh J, Veening W, Haglund E, May C, Bruch C (2017) Addressing conflict through collective action in natural resource management. Int J Commons 11(2):877–906. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiling K, Brady C (2015) Climate change and conflict: an annex to the USAID Climate-Resilient Development Framework

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond O (2010) A genealogy of peace and conflict theory. In: Richmond O (ed) Palgrave advances in peacebuilding: critical development and approaches. Palgrave, London, pp 14–38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha Menocal A (2015) Inclusive political settlements: evidence, gaps, and challenges of institutional transformation. International Development Department, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttinger L, Smith DFE, Stang G, Tänzler D, Vivekananda J (2015) A new climate for peace: taking action on climate and fragility risks: an Independent Report Commissioned by the G7 Members. Adelphi

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckener U (2002) Making power-sharing work: lessons from successes and failures in ethnic conflict regulation. J Peace Res 39(2):203–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman S, Snellinger A (2014) Framing the issues: the politics of “post-conflict”. In: Cultural anthropology online 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simangan D, Bose S (2021) Oiling the rigs of state-building: a political settlements analysis of petroleum revenue management in Timor-Leste. Asian J Peacebuilding 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart F (2011) Horizontal inequalities as a cause of conflict: a review of CRISE findings. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • The Resource Pack (2004) Conflict-sensitive approaches to development, humanitarian assistance and peacebuilding.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2009) United Nations policy for post-conflict employment creation, income generation and reintegration Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Upreti BR, Sharma SR, Paudel SB (2014) Food security in post conflict Nepal: challenges and opportunities. Kathmandu University and Nepal Centre for Contemporary Research (NCCR), Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Uvin P (1998) Aiding violence: the development enterprise in Rwanda. Kumarian Press

    Google Scholar 

  • van Baalen S, Mobjörk M (2016) A coming anarchy. In: Pathways from climate change to violent conflict in East Africa. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) & The Swedish Institute of International Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten P (2007) The World Bank's (post-) conflict agenda: the challenge of integrating development and security. Camb Rev Int Aff 20(4):639–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter BF (2004) Does conflict beget conflict? Explaining recurring civil war. J Peace Res 41(3):371–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webersik C (2008) Wars over resources? Evidence from Somalia. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 50(3):46–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder A, Lister S (2007) State-building at the subnational level in Afghanistan: a missed opportunity. In: Building state and security in Afghanistan, pp 85–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters JA (2011) Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011) World development report 2011: conflict, security, and development. The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Prakash Paudel & Keren Winterford

  2. Institute for Public Policy and Governance, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Yvette Selim

Authors
  1. Prakash Paudel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keren Winterford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yvette Selim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prakash Paudel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The IDEC Institute, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

    Ayyoob Sharifi

  2. The IDEC Institute, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

    Dahlia Simangan

  3. The IDEC Institute, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

    Shinji Kaneko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paudel, P., Winterford, K., Selim, Y. (2023). Exploring the Need for an Integrated Conflict Sensitivity Framework in Development Assistance that Contributes to Peaceful and Sustainable Post-conflict Societies. In: Sharifi, A., Simangan, D., Kaneko, S. (eds) Integrated Approaches to Peace and Sustainability . World Sustainability Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7295-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation