Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Horizontal Collaboration Business Model Towards a Sustainable I4.0 Value Creation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0

  • 481 Accesses

Abstract

Sustainable manufacturing 4.0 brings a new perspective in disruptive business models. As one of the three dimensions of Industry 4.0, horizontal collaboration integrates within I4.0 value creation network. In order to cope with this challenge, horizontal collaboration displays a variety of factors for enterprises to create or develop joint projects such as knowledge transfer, new product and process development, cyber-physical shared resources. Hence, this study presents a horizontal collaboration business model for value creation as part of a sustainable manufacturing 4.0 environment. For this to be achieved, horizontal collaboration variables must be presented within a business model structure. This development is based as of three business model components (1) content, (2) structure, and (3) governance; from which horizontal collaboration variables have been grouped. This document presents a CODAS-HTFLS-Mahalanobis approach to identify horizontal collaboration top variables grouped within the business model components, thus creating a value creation network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barratt M (2004) Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Manag Int J 9(1):30–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410517566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simatupang TM, Sridharan R (2002) The Collaborative Supply Chain. Int J Logistics Manag 13(1):15–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090210806333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cruijssen F, Cools M, Dullaert W (2007) Horizontal cooperation in logistics: opportunities and impediments. Transp Res Part E Logistics Transp Rev 43(2):129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Derrouiche R, Gamoura S, Damand D, Bouguessas H (2018) Towards a collaborative supply chain balanced score card framework to analyse collaborative value-added. In: IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, 2017 Dec, pp 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2017.8289926

  5. Whitehead K, Zacharia Z, Prater E (2019) Investigating the role of knowledge transfer in supply chain collaboration. Int J Logist Manag 30(1):284–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-07-2017-0184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yılmaz H, Çemberci M, Uca N (2016) The role of collaborative advantage for analyzing the effect of supply chain collaboration on firm performance. Int J Commer Finance 2(1):157–168

    Google Scholar 

  8. Agostini L, Nosella A (2019) Inter-organizational relationships involving SMEs: a bibliographic investigation into the state of the art. Long Range Plan 52(1):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn JM, Kim D, Moon S (2017) Determinants of innovation collaboration selection: a comparative analysis of Korea and Germany. Innovation 19(2):125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1241152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rendón A, Morales A et al (2010) Alianzas y adquisiciones. Estrategias de competitividad de las grandes empresas de capital privado nacional en México, RIICO, 978-970-27-2032-4. https://www.riico.net/index.php/riico/article/view/738

  11. Naesens K, Pintelon L, Taillieu T (2007) A framework for implementing and sustaining trust in horizontal partnerships. Supply Chain Forum Int J 8(1):32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2007.11517174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amit RH, Zott C (2012) Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 53(3):40–50. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1701660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baden-Fuller C, Morgan MS (2010) Business models as models. Long Range Plan 43(2–3):156–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan 43(2–3):354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saur-Amaral I, Soares RR, Proença JF (2018) Business model innovation: towards a conceptual framework. Tourism Manag Stud 14(1):80–93. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2018.14107

  16. Wirtz BW, Pistoia A, Ullrich S, Göttel V (2016) Business models: origin, development and future research perspectives. Long Range Plan 49(1):36–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer M, Imgrund F, Janiesch C, Winkelmann A (2020) Strategy archetypes for digital transformation: defining meta objectives using business process management. Inf Manag 57(5):103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Flanagan DJ, Lepisto DA, Ofstein LF (2018) Coopetition among nascent craft breweries: a value chain analysis. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 25(1):2–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2017-0173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Franco VB, Arboleda CDP, Cantillo V, Macea LF, Ríos DGR (2017) A collaborative supply chain model for non-for-profit networks based on cooperative game theory. Int J Logistics Syst Manage 26(4):475. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2017.082614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leitner R, Meizer F, Prochazka M, Sihn W (2011) Structural concepts for horizontal cooperation to increase efficiency in logistics. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 4(3):332–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pomponi F, Fratocchi L, Rossi Tafuri S (2015) Trust development and horizontal collaboration in logistics: a theory based evolutionary framework. Supply Chain Manag Int J 20(1):83–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2014-0078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanchez Rodrigues V, Harris I, Mason R (2015) Horizontal logistics collaboration for enhanced supply chain performance: an international retail perspective. Supply Chain Manag Int J 20(6):631–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. de Sousa L, Jabbour AB, Alves Filho AG, Noronha Viana AB, Chiappetta Jabbour CJ (2011) Factors affecting the adoption of supply chain management practices: evidence from the Brazilian electro-electronic sector. IIMB Manag Rev 23(4):208–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2011.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Björnfot A, Torjussen L (2012) Extent and effect of horizontal supply chain collaboration among construction SME. J Eng Project Prod Manag 2(1):47–55

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aggarwal S, Srivastava MK (2016) Towards a grounded view of collaboration in Indian agri-food supply chains. Br Food J 118(5):1085–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2015-0274

  26. Levi-Bliech M, Naveh G, Pliskin N, Fink L (2018) Mobile technology and business process performance: the mediating role of collaborative supply-chain capabilities. Inf Syst Manag 35(4):308–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1503803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Amer LE, Eltawil AB (2015) Analysis of quantitative models of horizontal collaboration in supply chain network design: Towards “green collaborative” strategies. In: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEOM.2015.7093759

  28. Pomponi F, Fratocchi L, Tafuri SR, Palumbo M (2013) Horizontal collaboration in logistics : a comprehensive framework. Res Logistics Prod 3:243–254

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prakash A, Deshmukh SG (2010) Horizontal collaboration in flexible supply chains: a simulation study. J Stud Manuf 1(January):54–58. http://www.hypersciences.org/JSM/Iss.1-2010/JSM-6-1-2010.pdf

  30. Shafique MN, Khurshid MM, Rahman H, Khanna A, Gupta D, Rodrigues JJPC (2019) The role of wearable technologies in supply chain collaboration: a case of pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Access 7:49014–49026. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van Lier T, Caris A, Macharis C (2016) Sustainability SI: bundling of outbound freight flows: analyzing the potential of internal horizontal collaboration to improve sustainability. Netw Spat Econ 16(1):277–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-014-9226-x

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. He Z, Ouyang J (2011) SME cluster development strategy of supply chain. In: 2nd International conference on artificial intelligence, management science and electronic commerce (AIMSEC), pp 4770–4772. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMSEC.2011.6010161

  33. Daudi M, Hauge JB, Thoben K-D (2016) Behavioral factors influencing partner trust in logistics collaboration: a review. Logist Res 9(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-016-0146-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hudnurkar M, Jakhar S, Rathod U (2014) Factors affecting collaboration in supply chain: a literature review. Proc Soc Behav Sci 133:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shin N, Park SH, Park S (2019) Partnership-based supply chain collaboration: impact on commitment, innovation, and firm performance. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020449

  36. Sitadewi D, Okdinawati L (2018) The conceptual framework of horizontal collaborative transportation management in Indonesian trucking industry, pp 42–58

    Google Scholar 

  37. Simatupang TM, Sridharan R (2008) Design for supply chain collaboration. Bus Process Manag J 14(3):401–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810876698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martin N, Verdonck L, Caris A, Depaire B (2018) Horizontal collaboration in logistics: decision framework and typology. Oper Manag Res 11(1–2):32–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-018-0131-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu Q, Luo X, Slotegraaf RJ, Aspara J (2015) Sleeping with competitors: the impact of NPD phases on stock market reactions to horizontal collaboration. J Acad Mark Sci 43(4):490–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0396-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2016) A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi- criteria decision-making. Econom Comput Econom Cybernet Stud Res 50(3):25–44

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang X, Xu Z (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29(12):1061–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Villa Silva AJ, Pérez Dominguez LA, Martínez Gómez E, Alvarado-Iniesta A, Pérez Olguín IJC (2019) Dimensional analysis under pythagorean fuzzy approach for supplier selection. Symmetry 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030336

  43. Sansabas-Villalpando V, Pérez-Olguín IJC, Pérez-Domínguez LA, Rodríguez-Picón LA, Mendez-González LC (2019) CODAS HFLTS method to appraise organizational culture of innovation and complex technological changes environments. Sustainability 11(24):7045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Badi I, Ballem M, Shetwan A (2018) Site selection of desalination plant in Libya by using combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method. Int J Qual Res 12(3):609–624. https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR12.03-04

  45. Aguarón-Joven J, Escobar-Urmeneta MT, García-Alcaraz JL, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Vega-Bonilla A (2015) A new synthesis procedure for TOPSIS based on AHP. DYNA. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n191.51140

  46. Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng X (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.125

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. OECD (2018) Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. In: The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities, 4th edn. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

  49. Brun E (2008) Ambiguity reduction in new product development projects. Int J Innov Manag 12(4):573–596. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919608002126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ali H, Syed Yahaya SS (2013) On robust mahalanobis distance issued from minimum vector variance. Far East J Math Sci 74(2):249–268

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Dokas P, Ertoz L, Kumar V, Lazarevic A, Srivastava J, Tan P-N (2002) Data mining for network intrusion detection. In: National science foundation workshop on next generation data mining 38(7):21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00975.x

  52. Li SZ, Jain A (eds) (2009) Mahalanobis distance. In: Encyclopedia of biometrics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_865

  53. Gao H, Yang J, Yin H, Ma Z (2017) The impact of partner similarity on alliance management capability, stability and performance. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 47(9):906–926. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-09-2016-0263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pérez CD, Ozuna AA, Arriaga AA (2011) Clustering and innovation capabilities in the mexican software industry. EMJ Eng Manage J 23(4):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2011.11431919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Escobedo Portillo MT, Plata JAS (2008) Mahalanobis y las aplicaciones de su distancia estadistica. Estadística 5(27):13–20

    Google Scholar 

  56. Durán Hernández F, Rodríguez Medina MA, Rodríguez Morachis M, Pérez Olguín IJC (2016) Aplicación del Sistema Mahalanobis-Taguchi (MTS), para Determinar Variables Significantes que Ayuden a Definir Perfiles de Éxito en Alumnos Egresados de la UTCJ. La Investigación Como Herramienta Del Desarrollo, pp 183–189

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jaharuddin NS, Mansor ZD, Yaakob S (2016) Assessing the supply chain intelligence practices of small medium enterprises in Malaysia. Proc Econ Finance 35:515–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00064-2

  58. Kohli AS, Jensen JB (2010) Assessing effectiveness of supply chain collaboration: an empirical study. Supply Chain Forum Int J 11(2):2–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2010.11517228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mojarro M, Pérez RJ, García JL (2007) Comparación de la técnica TOPSIS tradicional y la técnica TOPSIS con la distancia de Mahalanobis. Caso de estudio. Actitudestrascender

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pfeifer S, Peterka SO, Stanić M (2017) Business models of micro businesses: empirical evidence from creative industries. J Contemp Manage 22:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  61. Salam MA (2017) The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between technology, trust and operational performance. Benchmark Int J 24(2):298–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2015-0075

  62. Siong Choy C, Kuan Yew W, Lin B (2006) Criteria for measuring KM performance outcomes in organisations. Ind Manag Data Syst 106(7):917–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610688850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wind Y, Saaty TL (1980) Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Manage Sci 26(7):641–658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Xue X, Wang S, Lu B (2016) Manufacturing service composition method based on networked collaboration mode. J Netw Comput Appl 59:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez, Av. Del Charro, 32584 Cd. Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico

    Georgina Elizabeth Riosvelasco-Monroy, Iván Juan Carlos Pérez-Olguín, Luis Asunción Pérez-Domínguez & Jesús Andrés Hernández-Gómez

  2. Institute of Social Science and Administration, Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez, Av. Heroico Colegio Militar, 32000, Cd. Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico

    Julieta Flores-Amador

Authors
  1. Georgina Elizabeth Riosvelasco-Monroy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iván Juan Carlos Pérez-Olguín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julieta Flores-Amador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luis Asunción Pérez-Domínguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jesús Andrés Hernández-Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Georgina Elizabeth Riosvelasco-Monroy or Iván Juan Carlos Pérez-Olguín .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, UMR 6158 LIMOS, Institut Henri Fayol, Saint-Etienne, France

    Hamed Gholami

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, QC, Canada

    Georges Abdul-Nour

  3. Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor, Malaysia

    Safian Sharif

  4. Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Dalia Streimikiene

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Riosvelasco-Monroy, G.E., Pérez-Olguín, I.J.C., Flores-Amador, J., Pérez-Domínguez, L.A., Hernández-Gómez, J.A. (2023). Horizontal Collaboration Business Model Towards a Sustainable I4.0 Value Creation. In: Gholami, H., Abdul-Nour, G., Sharif, S., Streimikiene, D. (eds) Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7218-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7218-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7217-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7218-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation