Skip to main content

Impact of Marketing Reforms on Farm-Market Linkages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Food Value Chain Development

Abstract

Agriculture is the prime source of livelihood for majority of the Indian population. The contribution of agriculture in the national income contracted steadily since 1950–1951, coming down to around 18.8% in 2021–2022. Moreover, small and marginal holdings that constitute 85% to the total land holdings in India prevent farmers to adopt latest technology and also reduce their bargaining power in the market. With small marketable surpluses, these farmers are forced to sell their produce, locally under distressed conditions. Taking cognizance of the challenges faced by agricultural marketing system in India (input and output both), and in an effort to turn farming into a viable enterprise, the Government introduced several reforms over the years to establish farm-market linkages. These reforms have been well in line with the national and global needs, however, their effective implementation remains a question. The need of the hour is to produce as per the global and local market needs. Quality of the produce plays a key role in deciding the price. Adhering to Sanitary and phyto-sanitary standards could play a far bigger role in connecting farmers to the international markets, and enhance agricultural exports. At local/regional/national level, it is highly important to enhance the bargaining capacity of marginal and small peasants, hence aggregation of farm produce through formal producer’s organizations viz., producer companies and cooperatives are suggested as a viable solution to let small and marginal farmers realize scale economies. The marketing reforms are expected to enhance farm incomes—a major goal of existing Government policies. These reforms are also expected to establish strong marketing linkages in Agri-value chain. With this background, this chapter focuses on the impact of marketing reforms in India—expected and realized on farm-market linkages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal, B. (2010). Rethinking agricultural production collectivities. EPW Economic & Political Weekly, 14(9). Retrieved from environmentportal.in/files/Rethinking%20Agricultural%20Production%20Collectivities.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikkina, N., Turaga, R. M. R., & Bhamoriya, V. (2018). Farmer producer organizations as farmer collectives: A case study from India. Development and Policy Review, 36, 669–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisen, J., & Kumar, R. (2018). Agricultural marketing reforms and e-National Agricultural Market (e NAM) in India: A review. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 31, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, R., Pradhan, M., & Roy, D. (2020). Farmer organizations with its business as usual may not be the magic solution to covid-19 recovery. Retrieved April 07, 2022, from https://southasia.ifpri.info/2020/05/21/farmer-organizations-with-its-business-as-usual-may-not-be-the-magic-solution-to-covid-19-recovery/

  • Committee on Doubling Farmers Income. (2015). Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, R. M., & Joshi, S. (2014). Can producer associations improve rural livelihoods. Evidence from farmer centres in India. Journal of Development Studies, 50(1), 64–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggblade, S. D., Boughton, G., Denning, R., Kloeppinger Todd, K. M., Cho, S., Wilson, L. C., Than, N. E., & Sandar, T. M. (2013). A strategic agricultural sector and food security diagnostic for Myanmar. Draft working Paper draft for USAID/Burma, Michigan State University and the Myanmar Development Resource Institute’s Centre for Economic and Social Development. http://fsg.afre.msu.edu/Myanmar/myanmar_agricultural_sector_and_food_security_diagnostic_report.pdf

  • Henson, S., & Caswell, J. (1999). Food safety regulation: An overview of contemporary issues. Food Policy, 24(6), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(99)00072-X

  • Jaffee, S., Meer, K. V. D., Henson, S., Haan, C. D., Sewadeh, M., Ignacio, L., & Lisazo, M. B. (2005). Food safety and agricultural health standards: Challenges and opportunities for developing country exports. Retrieved from Washington, D.C. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/Topics/Standards/standards_challenges_synthesisreport.pdf

  • Manaswi, B. H., Kumar, P., Prakash, P., Anbukkani, P., Kar, A., Jha, G. K., Rao, D., & Lenin, V. (2020). Impact of farmer producer organization on organic chilli production in Telangana, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 19(1), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • NABARD Report. (2020–2021). National Paper-PLP. Retrieved from www.nabarad.org

  • Nuthalapati, C. S. R., Bhatt, Y., & Beero, S. K. (2020). Electronic National Agricultural Market (e-NAM) A review of performance and prospects, research report submitted to MoAF&W, GoI, Agricultural Economics Research Unit Institute of Economic Growth University Enclave, University of Delhi (North Campus).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). Innovation, agricultural productivity and sustainability in China. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/24114278

  • Rao, S. (2019). FPO emerging as the new MSME or village industry. Small Enterprises Development, Management & Extension Journal, 46(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, A. A. (2016). Impact of e-Markets in Karnataka, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 30(2), 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawairam, P. (2015). Case study of farmer producer organization in Maharashtra in the era of globalization. IBMRD’s Journal of Management & Research, 4(2), 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekhar, C. S., & Bhatt, Y. (2018). Electronic National Agricultural Market (e-NAM): A review of performance and prospects in Haryana. Agricultural Economics Research Centre, University of Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. (2019). Assessing the economic impacts of farmer producer organizations: A case study in Gujarat, India. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 32, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, S. V. (2018). A critique on agricultural marketing and laws in India. Journal of Law, 5(3), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pinaki Roy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, P. et al. (2023). Impact of Marketing Reforms on Farm-Market Linkages. In: Narula, S.A., Raj, S.P. (eds) Sustainable Food Value Chain Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6454-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics