Skip to main content

Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: The Role of Routine Versus Selective Histopathological Examination of Gallbladder Specimens After Cholecystectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gallbladder Cancer

Abstract

Despite the fact that gallbladder cancer is commonly diagnosed incidentally on histopathological examination after cholecystectomy, in the current practice there is no agreement on how to approach the assessment of gallbladder specimens. Although there are guidelines on the best way to examine the gallbladder, there is an ongoing debate as to whether such a practice should be performed routinely or on a selective basis. This chapter reviews data addressing both strategies. We also report our personal experience on the subject and conclude by providing an evidence-based approach to examining gallbladder specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Royal College of Pathologists. Tissue pathways for gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary pathology (G085). 2016. https://www.rcpath.org.

  2. Goetze TO. Gallbladder carcinoma: prognostic factors and therapeutic options. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(43):12211–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dincel O, Goksu M, Hatipoglu HS. Importance of routine histopathological examination of a gallbladder surgical specimen: unexpected gallbladder cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(6):1325–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swank HA, Mulder IM, Hop WC, van de Vijver MJ, Lange JF, Bemelman WA. Routine histopathology for carcinoma in cholecystectomy specimens not evidence based: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4439–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Behari A, Kapoor VK. Does gallbladder cancer divide India? Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010;29:3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jha V, Sharma P, Mandal KA. Incidental gallbladder carcinoma: utility of histopathological evaluation of routine cholecystectomy specimens. South Asian J Cancer. 2018;7(1):21–3. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-330X.226802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lundgren L, Muszynska C, Ros A, et al. Are incidental gallbladder cancers missed with a selective approach of gallbladder histology at cholecystectomy? World J Surg. 2018;42(4):1092–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hari DM, Howard JH, Leung AM, Chui CG, Sim MS, Bilchik AJ. A 21-year analysis of stage I gallbladder carcinoma: is cholecystectomy alone adequate? HPB. 2013;15:40–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pai SA, Bhat MG. Selective histopathology of gall bladders is unscientific and dangerous. Surgeon. 2004;2:241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bazoua G, Hamza N, Lazim T. Do we need histology for a normal-looking gallbladder? J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:564–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rammohan A, Cherukuri SD, Sathyanesan J, Palaniappan R, Govindan M. Incidental gall bladder cancers: are they truly incidental? World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014;6(12):441–3. https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v6.i12.441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mittal R, Jesudason MR, Nayak S. Selective histopathology in cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010;29:26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Royal College of Pathologists. Guidelines on staffing and workload for histopathology and cytology departments. 2nd ed. London: Royal College of Pathologists; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor HW, Huang JK. ‘Routine’ pathological examination of the gallbladder is a futile exercise. Br J Surg. 1998;85:208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. WHO classification of Tumours editorial board. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(2):182–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanthan R, Senger JL, Ahmed S, Kanthan SC. Gallbladder cancer in the 21st century. J Oncol. 2015;2015:967472. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/967472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lester SC. Manual of surgical pathology. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feakins R, Campbell F, Mears L, Moffat C, Scott N, Allen D. Tissue pathways for gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary pathology. London: The Royal College of Pathologists; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Akyürek N, Irkörücü O, Salman B, Erdem O, Sare M, Tatlicioglu E. Unexpected gallbladder cancer during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 2004;11:357–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh VP, Rajesh S, Bihari C, Desai SN, Pargewar SS, Arora A. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: what every radiologist should know. World J Radiol. 2016;8(2):183–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Di Mauro D, Orabi A, Myintmo A, Reece-Smith A, Wajed S, Manzelli A. Routine examination of gallbladder specimens after cholecystectomy: a single-Centre analysis of the incidence, clinical and histopathological aspects of incidental gallbladder carcinoma. Discov Oncol. 2021;12(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-021-00399-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Di Mauro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Di Mauro, D. et al. (2023). Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: The Role of Routine Versus Selective Histopathological Examination of Gallbladder Specimens After Cholecystectomy. In: Kumar Shukla, V., Pandey, M., Dixit, R. (eds) Gallbladder Cancer. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6442-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6442-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-6441-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-6442-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics