Abstract
A variety of microorganisms produce secondary metabolites, which serves as a source of natural products. These natural products have been an interest and a source of inspiration for scientists and researchers for the development and well-being of civilizations. Nowadays, modern technologies and effective scientific tools have made it possible to use such beneficiary microbes in the best possible way. Microbial-based products, especially biofertilizers and biopesticides, are known to be effective green alternatives to overcome adverse effect of chemical fertilizer and pesticides caused during green revolution. However, in India usage of such microbial-based products in agriculture is still at a very small scale. To overcome this issue, the Indian government has encouraged the use of biofertilizers and biopesticides by placing them into many of the agricultural schemes. Although, legal barriers imposed on their manufacturing, trade, import, storage, transport, and disposal restrict their production and adaptability hence, the declining interest of farmers have become a matter of concern. The main objective of this chapter is to highlight the legal provisions of the Indian laws regulating biofertilizers and biopesticides. Legal analysis stated in this chapter is based on published comparative legal research, which could enforce the manufacture process with high quality standard of biofertilizers and biopesticides present on the market and thus foster their use by farmers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arjjumend H, Koutouki K (2020) Legal barriers and quality compliance in the business of biofertilizers and biopesticides in India. J Legal Stud 26(40):81–101
Arjjumend H, Koutouki K (2021) Analysis of Indian and Canadian laws regulating the biopesticides: a comparison. J Environ Law Policy 1:26
Brahmachari G (2004) Neem—an omnipotent plant: a retrospection. Chembiochem 5(4):408–421
Chandler D, Bailey AS, Tatchell GM, Davidson G, Greaves J, Grant WP (2011) The development, regulation and use of biopesticides for integrated pest management. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366(1573):1987–1998
Kumar S, Singh A (2014) Biopesticides for integrated crop management: environmental and regulatory aspects. J Biofertil Biopestici 5:e121
Kumar S, Singh A (2015) Biopesticides: present status and the future prospects. J Fertil Pestic 6(2):100–129
Malusá E, Vassilev N (2014) A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(15):6599–6607
Mishra J, Dutta V, Arora NK (2020) Biopesticides in India: technology and sustainability linkages. 3 Biotech 10(5):1–12
Van Lenteren JC (2012) The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. BioControl 57(1):1–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
![A legal form titled prescribed forms under fertilizers control order 1957 slash 1985 form A. The form has a sub-head that reads the application to obtain the dealer's certificate of registration.](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/chp%3A10.1007%2F978-981-19-5747-5_5/MediaObjects/520818_1_En_5_Figa_HTML.png)
![A continued part of the form is to obtain the dealer's certificate of registration. It has pointers 8 to 10 d with notes and blanks for date and signature on the bottom.](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/chp%3A10.1007%2F978-981-19-5747-5_5/MediaObjects/520818_1_En_5_Figb_HTML.png)
Appendix 2
![A legal form titled form O with the sub-head for a certificate of source for carrying on the business of selling fertilizers in wholesale slash retail for industrial use.](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/chp%3A10.1007%2F978-981-19-5747-5_5/MediaObjects/520818_1_En_5_Figc_HTML.png)
![A legal form with a table to fill in the columns for the name of fertilizers and trademark or brand name. In the row, pointer 4 has some declarations. The bottom right side has a blank for the signature and stamp of the officer.](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/chp%3A10.1007%2F978-981-19-5747-5_5/MediaObjects/520818_1_En_5_Figd_HTML.png)
Appendix 3: Technical Data Required for Registering a Biopesticide in India
-
1.
Strain specification
-
Genus and species.
-
Rhizosphere competence.
-
Biological control capability.
-
Growth promotion capability.
-
Wide range of growth parameters like pH and temperature.
-
-
2.
CFU count
-
The data required for claiming 1 year shelf life of the product is for 15 months for talc-based formulation, i.e., the microbe should remain viable for 15 months with a colony forming units (CFU) count not less than 2 × 106 spores/mL or g on selective media (SM).
-
Pathogenic contaminants such as Salmonella, Shigella, and Vibrio should not be present. Other microbial contaminants not to exceed 1 × 104 counts/mL or g.
-
-
3.
Target fungi
-
4.
Moisture content
-
Maximum moisture content of the product should not exceed more than 8% for dry formulation of fungi and 12% for bacteria.
-
-
5.
Chemistry
-
Systematic name: Genus and species.
-
Common name, if any.
-
Natural occurrence: morphological description.
-
Manufacturing process: solid or liquid state fermentation.
-
Qualitative analysis.
-
CFU on selective medium.
-
Absence of Gram– bacterial contaminants (Salmonella, Shigella, and Vibrio).
-
Moisture content.
-
Shelf life claim: two different locations along with meteorological data.
-
-
6.
Technical bulletin/Product profile.
Bioefficiency:
-
Lab bioefficacy test: The product should be tested against target pathogen/pest at one of the laboratories of ICAR/SAUs/CSIR/ICMR system.
-
Field bioefficacy test: The intended product should be tested for field bioefficacy under Indian conditions.
-
Field bioefficacy guidelines have been recently revised/enhanced w.e.f. 01.01.2011.
Field Bioefficiency:
-
9(3B): Provisional Registration.
-
One crop: two seasons (rabi and kharif)/year, two agro-climatic conditions (four bioefficacy trial reports).
-
9(3): Permanent Registration.
-
One crop: two seasons (rabi and kharif)/year, three agro-climatic conditions (six bioefficacy trial reports).
-
Safety data on nontarget organisms.
-
-
7.
Toxicity
-
Toxicological studies may be conducted by recognized institutes viz. IITR Lucknow, IIBAT Chennai, JR Foundation Vapi, INTOX, Pune.
-
(a)
(For formulated products to be directly manufactured).
-
Single dose oral—Rat (21 days) (Toxicity/Infectivity/Pathogenicity).
-
Single dose oral—Mouse (21 days) (Toxicity/Infectivity/Pathogenicity).
-
Single dose Pulmonary—Rat (14 days) (Toxicity/Infectivity/Pathogenicity).
-
Single dose Dermal—Rabbit (21 days) (Toxicity/Infectivity/Pathogenicity).
-
Single dose Dermal—Intraperitoneal (21 days) (Toxicity/Infectivity/Pathogenicity).
-
Primary skin irritation.
-
Eye irritation.
-
-
(b)
Human Safety Records.
-
Environmental Toxicological Studies (For formulation only) On Nontarget Vertebrates.
-
Toxicity to chicken, pigeon, freshwater fish.
-
-
Dossier preparation for 9(3b) and 9(3) registration.
-
-
(a)
-
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patel, P., Naik, A. (2023). Ethical and Legal Issues in Microbial Products in India. In: Amaresan, N., Dharumadurai, D., Babalola, O.O. (eds) Agricultural Microbiology Based Entrepreneurship . Microorganisms for Sustainability, vol 39. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5747-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5747-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5746-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5747-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)