Abstract
This chapter addresses two major questions: a) What is the differentia of language of religion (LR)? Does LR/register differ from other registers of a language exclusively in terms of its linguistic (structural) features and/or social functions? and b) Does LR make any significant contribution to our understanding of language? In other words, does it provide any insights into the nature of language—its structure and function? The chapter presents evidence to show that LR cannot be defined exclusively in terms of its linguistic structures, and if it is defined exclusively within functional approach as “register”, it cannot be treated at par with other registers of a language. I argue that LR differs from other register as its non-religious counterpart in terms of the underlying conceptualization of reality. The linguistic structures of language of religion derive their meaning with reference to its underlying conceptual framework, the worldview, that is, its “deep structure” or the conceptualization of reality is based on their religious beliefs, which marks it different from other registers. This distinctiveness of religious language provides a criterion for separating it from other registers (i.e., it differs from other registers in its conceptualization of reality). Furthermore, I argue that the users of language of religion can have two different conceptual frameworks of reality.
Finally, I suggest that a community’s repertoire can include more than one conceptual framework. I suggest that similar to diglossia (Ferguson 1959), according to which, speakers use the language, which is functionally appropriate to a domain, there is a need to assume a di-system (more than one system of underlying conceptualization, “world view” of reality) which people use in different social contexts. In order to support this claim, I will provide evidence from the language of religion in the Hinduism in the US diaspora.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aerts, D., Apostel, L., De Moor, B., Hellemans, S., Maex, E., Van Belle, H., Van Der Veken, J. (1994). Worldviews: From Fragmentation to integration, Brussels: VUB Press (Vrije Universiteit Brussel press). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldview.
Alton, B.S. (1991). Introduction. Religions and languages: a colloquium. Toronto Studies in Religion. New York Peter Lang. pp. 1–20.
Austin, J.L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press. A.J. Ayer (eds) 1946. Language, Truth, and Logic. London: Gollancz.
Ayer, A.J. (1936). Language, Truth, and Logic. London: Gollancz. (2nd ed., 1946). OCLC 416788667 Reprinted 2001 with a new introduction, London: Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-118604-7.
Braithwaite, R. (1970). An empiricist's view of the nature of religious belief. In B. Mitchell (ed.). The philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–91.
Brown, R., Lenneberg E. (1954). A study in language and cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(3), 454–462
Crystal, D. (1965). Linguistics, language and religion. London: Burns and Oats.
Crystal, D. (1976a). Nonsegmental phonology in religious modalities. In W. J. Samarin (ed.). Language in Religious Practice. Rawley, Massachusetts: Newbury Publishing House, Inc. pp.
Crystal, D. (1976b). The problem of language variety: An example from religious language. In G. Vesey (ed.). Communication and Understanding. 1975-1976. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures. pp. 195–207. Hassocks, UK: Harvester Press.
Crystal, D. (1981). Generating theological language. In J.P. Van Noppen (ed.) Theolinguistics (Free University, Brussels), Studiereeks Tijdschrift VUB, Niuwe Series No. 8, pp. 265–81.
Crystal, D. (2018). Whatever happened to Theolinguistics? In Chilton P. and M. Kopytowska (eds.). Religion, language and the Human Mind. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–18.
Darquennes, J., Vandenbussche W. (2011). Language and religion as a sociolinguistic field of study: some introductory notes. Sociolinguistica, 25.
Donovan, P. (1982). Religious language. London: Sheldon Press.
Earnst, C. (2004). Following Muhammad: Rethinking Islam in the contemporary world. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Ferguson, C. A. Diglossia. Word, 152(1959), 325–340.
Fergusen, C.A. (1976). The collect as a form of discourse. In W.J. Samarin (ed.). Language in religious practice. Rawley, Massachusetts: Newbury Publishing House, Inc. pp. 101–13.
Fishman, J.A. (1982). Whorfianism of the third kind: Ethnolinguistic diversity as a worldwide societal asset. Language in Society, 11, 1–14.
Fishman, J.A. (2006). A decalogue of basic theoretical perspectives for sociology of language and religion. In: T. Omoniyi, and J.A Fishman. (eds.). Explorations in the Sociology of Language of Religion. Amsterdam.John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 13–25.
Flew, A., MacIntyre A. (eds). (1955). Theology and falsification. In: New Essays in Philosophical Theology. New York: Macmillan. pp. 96–108.
Gossen, G.H. (1976). Language as ritual substance. In W. J. Samarin (ed.). Language in religious practice. Rawley, Massachusetts: Newbury Publishing House, Inc. pp. 40–62.
Hare, R.M. (1950) (Revised edition 1955). Theology and Falsification. New Essays in Philosophical Theology. New York: Macmillan. pp. 99–103.
Holt, R. (2006). A sociolinguistic approach to religious language. Australian Journal of Theology, 6, pp.1–14.
Hume, C., Beverley B.C. (1998). The philosophy of religion: a critical introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. pp.98.
Kunjuni Raja, K. (1963). Indian Theories Meaning. Madras: The Adyar Library and Research Center.
Ladriere, J. (1973). Language and belief, Trans. G. Barden. Dublin: Gill& McMillan.
Lawson, E.T., McCauley, R. (1993). Rethinking religion: Connecting cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press. pp. 51.
Matilal, B.K. (1991). Ineffability: Issues of logic and language. In Religions and languages: A colloquium. Toronto Studies in Religion. New York Peter Lang. pp.115–124.
Omoniyi, T. (2006). Epilogue societal multilingualism and multifaithism: A sociology of language and religion perspective sm. In T. Omoniyi, and J.A. Fishman. (eds.). Explorations in the Sociology of Language of Religion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 121–140.
Omoniyi, T. and J.A. Fishman. (2006). Explorations in the sociology of language of religion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pandharipande, R.V. (2006). Ideology, authority and language choice: Language of religion in South Asia. In Omoniyi, T. and J.A. Fishman. 2006 (eds.) Explorations in the sociology of language of religion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp.141–164.
Pandharipande, R.V. (2010). Authenticatinga tradition in transition: Language of Hinduism in the US. In T. Omoniyi (ed.) Language and religion: change, conflict and accommodation. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 58–83.
Pandharipande, R.V. (2013). The language of Hinduism in the US diaspora. World Englishes, 32 (3), 417–428.
Pandharipande R.V, David M.K., Ebsworth M.E. (eds.). (2019). Language maintenance, revival and shift in the sociology of religion. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ravenhill, P.L. (1976). Religious utterances and the theory of speech acts. In W. J. Samarin (ed.). Language in religious practice. Rawley, Massachusetts: Newbury Publishing House, Inc. pp. 26–39.
Samarin, W.J. (1976). Language of religion. In Language of religious practice, Series in Sociolinguistics, Rowley: Newbury House Publishers, Inc, pp. 3–14.
Sawyer, J.F.A., & Simpson J.M.Y. (2001). Concise encyclopedia of Language and Religion. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Spolsky, B. (2006). Introduction Part II. In T.Omoniyi and J.A. Fishman (eds.). Explorations in the sociology of language and religion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 4–8.
Suleiman, M.Y.I.H. (2001). Arabic linguistic tradition. (Sawyer, J.F.A. and J.M.Y. Simpson (eds.) Concise Encyclopedia of Language and Religion. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 326–336.
Tillich, P. (1963). The Eternal Now. London: S.C.M. Press.
Waardenburg, J. (1979). The language of religion and the study of religions as sign systems. In Science of religion: studies in methodology. Proceedings of the study conference of the international association of the history of religions, held in Turku, Finland (August 27–31, 1973). The Hague; Mouton Publishers. pp.441–457.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe (3rd edition 1969). New York: Macmillan.
Whorf, B.L. (2012). J.B. Carroll, S.C. Levinson, and P. Lee (2nd edition). Cambridge: Mass.: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pandharipande, R.V. (2023). Language of Religion: What Does It Inform the Field of Linguistics?. In: Kumar, R., Prakash, O. (eds) Language Studies in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5276-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5276-0_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5275-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5276-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)