Abstract
As a labour-intensive industry, the casualties caused by safety accidents in the construction industry have always been at the forefront of all industries. Most safety accidents during the construction process are attributed to workers themselves, so how to effectively reduce the accidents caused by construction workers has become an important issue for the construction safety management. Among them, the process of construction workers’ subjective risk perception is the key to change their behaviour and decision-making. Thus, this article is based on the related concepts of construction engineering hazard identification and neuromanagement. Use EEG to do event-related potential experiments to study the process of construction workers’ hazard identification. Then conduct an objective analysis of the experimental results. It is found that individuals produce more significant P200 and LPP waveform in the process of risk identification, and there are significant differences in the P200 amplitudes produced by different types of dangerous stimuli. At the same time, the experimental results showed that, before the individual was stimulated by the dangerous pictures, the brain will perform two-stage processing, that is, the early perception of emergencies and the subjective risk level judgment. In summary, it showed that the cross-application of neuroscience in the engineering field can open up new fields for research and conduct deeper explorations. At the same time, it further confirms the importance of human factors in the study of construction safety-related issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carter, G., Smith, S.D.: Safety hazard identification on construction projects. J. Construction Eng. Manage. 132, 197–205 (2006)
Mohurd: Announcement of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China on the Production Safety Accidents of Housing and Municipal Engineering in 2019 (2020)
Caixia, Z.: Research on the Path of Action of Safety Behavior of Construction Enterprise Managers and Workers on Safety Performance. Chongqing University (2015)
Ahmadian Fard Fini, A., Akbarnezhad, A., Rashidi, T.H., Waller, S.T.: Enhancing the safety of construction crew by accounting for brain resource requirements of activities in job assignment. Autom. Constr. 88, 31–43 (2018)
Goh, Y.M., Ubeynarayana, C.U., Wong, K.L.X., Guo, B.H.W.: Factors influencing unsafe behaviors: a supervised learning approach. Accid Anal. Prev 118, 77–85 (2018)
Pan, X., Lin, Y., He, C.: A review of cognitive models in human reliability analysis. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 33, 1299–1316 (2017)
Jeelani, I., Albert, A., Gambatese, J.A.: Why do construction hazards remainunrecognized at the work interface. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143(5), 04016128 (2017)
Li, H., Wang, D., Chen, J., Luo, X., Li, J., Xing, X.: Pre-service fatigue screening for construction workers through wearable EEG-based signal spectral analysis. Automation in Construction 106, 102851 (2019)
Namian, M., Albert, A., Zuluaga, C.M., Jaselskis, E.J.: Improving hazard-recognition performance and safety training outcomes: integrating strategies for training transfer. J. Construction Eng. Manage. 142(10) (2016)
Hunter, D.R.: Risk perception among general aviation pilots. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 16, 135–144 (2006)
Newaz, M.T., Davis, P., Jefferies, M., Pillay, M.: The psychological contract: a missing link between safety climate and safety behaviour on construction sites. Saf. Sci. 112, 9–17 (2019)
Yang, J., Ye, G., Xiang, Q., Kim, M., Liu, Q., Yue, H.: Insights into the mechanism of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors from an individual perspective. Safety Sci. 133, 105004 (2021)
Yifan, W.: Research on Security Risk Perception of Warning Signs and Their Attributes. China University of Geosciences (2019)
Jin, R., et al.: A science mapping approach based review of construction safety research. Saf. Sci. 113, 285–297 (2019)
Choi, B., Jebelli, H., Lee, S.: Feasibility analysis of electrodermal activity (EDA) acquired from wearable sensors to assess construction workers’ perceived risk. Saf. Sci. 115(2), 110–120 (2019)
Liao, P.-C., Sun, X., Zhang, D.: A multimodal study to measure the cognitive demands of hazard recognition in construction workplaces. Safety Sci. 133, 105010 (2021)
JungHo, J., Hubo, C., Denny, Y., Xin, X.: Identification of Safety Hazards Using Wearable EEG. Construction Research Congress, pp. 185–94 (2020)
Liang, B., Lin, Y.: Using physiological and behavioral measurements in a picture-based road hazard perception experiment to classify risky and safe drivers. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58, 93–105 (2018)
Hwang, S., Jebelli, H., Choi, B., Choi, M., Lee, S.: Measuring Workers’ Emotional State during Construction Tasks Using Wearable EEG. J. Construction Eng. Manage. 144(7), 04018050 (2018)
Dzeng, R.-J., Lin, C.-T., Fang, Y.-C.: Using eye-tracker to compare search patterns between experienced and novice workers for site hazard identification. Saf. Sci. 82, 56–67 (2016)
Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Liao, P.-C., Zhang, D.: Hazard differentiation embedded in the brain: A near-infrared spectroscopy-based study. Automation in Construction 122, 103473 (2021)
Guo, Z., Pan, Y., Zhao, G., Zhang, J., Dong, N.: Recognizing hazard perception in a visual blind area based on EEG features. IEEE Access 8, 48917–48928 (2020)
Nicolas-Alonso, L.F., Gomez-Gil, J.: Brain computer interfaces, a review. Sensors (Basel) 12, 1211–1279 (2012)
Schupp, H.T., Stockburger, J., Codispoti, M., Junghofer, M., Weike, A.I., Hamm, A.O.: Selective visual attention to emotion. J Neurosci 27, 1082–1089 (2007)
Yun, L.: Research on the Influence of Taste and Environmental Information Clues on Consumers’ Online Meal Ordering Behavior. Hefei University of Technology (2020)
Lopez-Calderon, J., Luck, S.J.: ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front Hum Neurosci 8, 213 (2014)
Mumtaz, W., Rasheed, S., Irfan, A.: Review of challenges associated with the EEG artifact removal methods. Biomedical Signal Process. Control 68, 102741 (2021)
Jinyan, S.: Use EEG and photoelectric combined detection to study the orientation and executive control of attention. Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2013)
Min, B.-K., et al.: Electrophysiological Decoding of Spatial and Color Processing in Human Prefrontal Cortex, NeuroImage (2021)
Lin, S.: Research on Emergency Response of Miners’ Production Emergencies Based on ERPs. Xi’an University of Science and Technology (2015)
Acı, Ç.İ, Kaya, M., Mishchenko, Y.: Distinguishing mental attention states of humans via an EEG-based passive BCI using machine learning methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 134, 153–166 (2019)
Alomari, R.A., Fernandez, M., Banks, J.B., Acosta, J., Tartar, J.L.: Acute stress dysregulates the LPP ERP response to emotional pictures and impairs sustained attention: time-sensitive effects. Brain Sci 5, 201–219 (2015)
Fei, H.: Research on Brain Mechanism of Risk Avoidance and Risk Seeking Decision Based on Kahneman Prospect Theory. The Fourth Military Medical University (2009)
Perlman, A., Sacks, R., Barak, R.: Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Saf. Sci. 64, 22–31 (2014)
Acknowledgment
This research is funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No.71974132), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2018A0303130037), and Shenzhen Government Nature Science Foundation (Grant No. JCYJ20190808115809385).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, Z., Ding, Z., Chen, W. (2022). A Study of Construction Workers’ Hazard Recognition Process Based on EEG Experiment. In: Guo, H., Fang, D., Lu, W., Peng, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2021. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5256-2_111
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5256-2_111
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5255-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5256-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)