Skip to main content

A Study of Construction Workers’ Hazard Recognition Process Based on EEG Experiment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (CRIOCM 2021)

Abstract

As a labour-intensive industry, the casualties caused by safety accidents in the construction industry have always been at the forefront of all industries. Most safety accidents during the construction process are attributed to workers themselves, so how to effectively reduce the accidents caused by construction workers has become an important issue for the construction safety management. Among them, the process of construction workers’ subjective risk perception is the key to change their behaviour and decision-making. Thus, this article is based on the related concepts of construction engineering hazard identification and neuromanagement. Use EEG to do event-related potential experiments to study the process of construction workers’ hazard identification. Then conduct an objective analysis of the experimental results. It is found that individuals produce more significant P200 and LPP waveform in the process of risk identification, and there are significant differences in the P200 amplitudes produced by different types of dangerous stimuli. At the same time, the experimental results showed that, before the individual was stimulated by the dangerous pictures, the brain will perform two-stage processing, that is, the early perception of emergencies and the subjective risk level judgment. In summary, it showed that the cross-application of neuroscience in the engineering field can open up new fields for research and conduct deeper explorations. At the same time, it further confirms the importance of human factors in the study of construction safety-related issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carter, G., Smith, S.D.: Safety hazard identification on construction projects. J. Construction Eng. Manage. 132, 197–205 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohurd: Announcement of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China on the Production Safety Accidents of Housing and Municipal Engineering in 2019 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caixia, Z.: Research on the Path of Action of Safety Behavior of Construction Enterprise Managers and Workers on Safety Performance. Chongqing University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmadian Fard Fini, A., Akbarnezhad, A., Rashidi, T.H., Waller, S.T.: Enhancing the safety of construction crew by accounting for brain resource requirements of activities in job assignment. Autom. Constr. 88, 31–43 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goh, Y.M., Ubeynarayana, C.U., Wong, K.L.X., Guo, B.H.W.: Factors influencing unsafe behaviors: a supervised learning approach. Accid Anal. Prev 118, 77–85 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan, X., Lin, Y., He, C.: A review of cognitive models in human reliability analysis. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 33, 1299–1316 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeelani, I., Albert, A., Gambatese, J.A.: Why do construction hazards remainunrecognized at the work interface. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143(5), 04016128 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, H., Wang, D., Chen, J., Luo, X., Li, J., Xing, X.: Pre-service fatigue screening for construction workers through wearable EEG-based signal spectral analysis. Automation in Construction 106, 102851 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Namian, M., Albert, A., Zuluaga, C.M., Jaselskis, E.J.: Improving hazard-recognition performance and safety training outcomes: integrating strategies for training transfer. J. Construction Eng. Manage. 142(10) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hunter, D.R.: Risk perception among general aviation pilots. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 16, 135–144 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Newaz, M.T., Davis, P., Jefferies, M., Pillay, M.: The psychological contract: a missing link between safety climate and safety behaviour on construction sites. Saf. Sci. 112, 9–17 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, J., Ye, G., Xiang, Q., Kim, M., Liu, Q., Yue, H.: Insights into the mechanism of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors from an individual perspective. Safety Sci. 133, 105004 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yifan, W.: Research on Security Risk Perception of Warning Signs and Their Attributes. China University of Geosciences (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jin, R., et al.: A science mapping approach based review of construction safety research. Saf. Sci. 113, 285–297 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi, B., Jebelli, H., Lee, S.: Feasibility analysis of electrodermal activity (EDA) acquired from wearable sensors to assess construction workers’ perceived risk. Saf. Sci. 115(2), 110–120 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liao, P.-C., Sun, X., Zhang, D.: A multimodal study to measure the cognitive demands of hazard recognition in construction workplaces. Safety Sci. 133, 105010 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. JungHo, J., Hubo, C., Denny, Y., Xin, X.: Identification of Safety Hazards Using Wearable EEG. Construction Research Congress, pp. 185–94 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liang, B., Lin, Y.: Using physiological and behavioral measurements in a picture-based road hazard perception experiment to classify risky and safe drivers. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58, 93–105 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hwang, S., Jebelli, H., Choi, B., Choi, M., Lee, S.: Measuring Workers’ Emotional State during Construction Tasks Using Wearable EEG. J. Construction Eng. Manage. 144(7), 04018050 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dzeng, R.-J., Lin, C.-T., Fang, Y.-C.: Using eye-tracker to compare search patterns between experienced and novice workers for site hazard identification. Saf. Sci. 82, 56–67 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Liao, P.-C., Zhang, D.: Hazard differentiation embedded in the brain: A near-infrared spectroscopy-based study. Automation in Construction 122, 103473 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guo, Z., Pan, Y., Zhao, G., Zhang, J., Dong, N.: Recognizing hazard perception in a visual blind area based on EEG features. IEEE Access 8, 48917–48928 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicolas-Alonso, L.F., Gomez-Gil, J.: Brain computer interfaces, a review. Sensors (Basel) 12, 1211–1279 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schupp, H.T., Stockburger, J., Codispoti, M., Junghofer, M., Weike, A.I., Hamm, A.O.: Selective visual attention to emotion. J Neurosci 27, 1082–1089 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yun, L.: Research on the Influence of Taste and Environmental Information Clues on Consumers’ Online Meal Ordering Behavior. Hefei University of Technology (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lopez-Calderon, J., Luck, S.J.: ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front Hum Neurosci 8, 213 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mumtaz, W., Rasheed, S., Irfan, A.: Review of challenges associated with the EEG artifact removal methods. Biomedical Signal Process. Control 68, 102741 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jinyan, S.: Use EEG and photoelectric combined detection to study the orientation and executive control of attention. Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Min, B.-K., et al.: Electrophysiological Decoding of Spatial and Color Processing in Human Prefrontal Cortex, NeuroImage (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lin, S.: Research on Emergency Response of Miners’ Production Emergencies Based on ERPs. Xi’an University of Science and Technology (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Acı, Ç.İ, Kaya, M., Mishchenko, Y.: Distinguishing mental attention states of humans via an EEG-based passive BCI using machine learning methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 134, 153–166 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Alomari, R.A., Fernandez, M., Banks, J.B., Acosta, J., Tartar, J.L.: Acute stress dysregulates the LPP ERP response to emotional pictures and impairs sustained attention: time-sensitive effects. Brain Sci 5, 201–219 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fei, H.: Research on Brain Mechanism of Risk Avoidance and Risk Seeking Decision Based on Kahneman Prospect Theory. The Fourth Military Medical University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Perlman, A., Sacks, R., Barak, R.: Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction. Saf. Sci. 64, 22–31 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research is funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No.71974132), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2018A0303130037), and Shenzhen Government Nature Science Foundation (Grant No. JCYJ20190808115809385).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhikun Ding .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, Z., Ding, Z., Chen, W. (2022). A Study of Construction Workers’ Hazard Recognition Process Based on EEG Experiment. In: Guo, H., Fang, D., Lu, W., Peng, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2021. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5256-2_111

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics