Abstract
How do international and local actors gauge the success and failure of peacebuilding? This chapter seeks to answer this question by examining the similarities and differences in international and local perceptions of peacebuilding success and failure using the cases of United Nations peacekeeping operations in Kosovo and Timor-Leste. The data are drawn from in-depth interviews with individuals who have been involved in various capacities across several peacebuilding components, specifically security, justice and reconciliation, socio-economic development, and governance. The analysis results in a descriptive typology of perceptions based on structural, procedural, effectual, and conceptual criteria of success and failure. This typology can be used in assessing peacebuilding outcomes using micro-evidence from the peacebuilding process. Perceptions play a role in prioritizing international peacebuilding tasks and identifying local needs and sources of discontent during the peacebuilding process. Understanding international and local perceptions of success/failure is valuable for informing and designing policies for international peacebuilding and local involvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aoi C, de Coning C, Thakur R (2007) Unintended consequences of peacekeeping operations. United Nations University Press, Tokyo
Autesserre S (2014) Peaceland: conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge University Press, New York
Autesserre S (2017) International peacebuilding and local success: assumptions and effectiveness. Int Stud Rev 19(1):114–132
Babo-Soares D (2004) Nahe Biti: the philosophy and process of grassroots reconciliation (and justice) in East Timor. Asia Pac J Anthropol 5(1):15–33
Boege V (2019) The rambutan, the chopper and the broken spear: peacebuilding on Bougainville as a cross-cultural exchange. Peacebuild 7(1):1–19
Boege V, Rinck P (2019) The local/international interface in peacebuilding: experiences from Bougainville and Sierra Leone. Int Peacekeep 26(2):216–239
Call CT (2008) Knowing peace when you see it: setting standards for peacebuilding success. Civil Wars 10(2):173–194
Campbell SP (2008) When process matters: the potential implications of organisational learning for peacebuilding success. J Peacebuilding Dev 4(2):20–32
CAVR (2005) Chega! The report of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor (CAVR). CAVR, Dili
Diehl PF, Druckman D (2010) Evaluating peace operations. Lynne Rienner, Boulder
Doyle MW, Sambanis N (2000) International peacebuilding: a theoretical and quantitative analysis. Am Polit Sci Rev 94(4):779–801
Doyle MW, Sambanis N (2006) Making war and building peace: United Nations peace operations. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Fast LA, Neufeldt RC (2005) Envisioning success: building blocks for strategic and comprehensive peacebuilding impact evaluation. J Peacebuilding Dev 2(2):24–41
Firchow P (2018) Reclaiming everyday peace: local voices in measurement and evaluation after war. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fortna VP (2008) Does peacekeeping work? Shaping belligerents’ choices after civil war. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Haugerudbraaten H (1998) Peacebuilding: six dimensions and two concepts. Afr Secur Rev 7(6):17–26
Hellmüller S (2013) The power of perceptions: localizing international peacebuilding approaches. Int Peacekeeping 20(2):219–232
Hirblinger AT, Simons C (2015) The good, the bad, and the powerful: representations of the ‘local’ in peacebuilding. Secur Dialogue 46(5):422–439
Howard LM (2008) UN peacekeeping after civil wars. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Howard LM (2013) State-building through neotrusteeship: Kosovo and East Timor in comparative perspective. WIDER working paper, no. 2013/126. The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki
Kohl C (2015) Diverging expectations and perceptions of peacebuilding? Local owners’ and external actors’ interactions in Guinea-Bissau’s security sector reforms. J Interv Statebuilding 9(3):334–352
Mac Ginty R (2011) International peacebuilding and local resistance: hybrid forms of peace. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire and New York
Mac Ginty R, Richmond O (2015) The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: a reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding. Int Peacekeeping 23(2):219–239
McVeigh K (2017) Haitian mums seek support from UN troops for ‘peacekeeper babies.’ The Guardian, December 16
Millar G (2010) Assessing local experiences of truth-telling in Sierra Leone: getting to ‘why’ through a qualitative case study analysis. Int J Transitional Justice 4(3):477–496
Millar G (2011) Between western theory and local practice: cultural impediments to truth-telling in Sierra Leone. Conflict Resolut Q 29(2):177–199
Millar G (2013) Expectations and experiences of peacebuilding in Sierra Leone: parallel peacebuilding processes and compound friction. Int Peacekeeping 20(2):189–203
Millar G (2014) An ethnographic approach to peacebuilding: understanding local experiences in transitional states. Routledge, Oxon and New York
Müller P, Zahda Y (2018) Local perceptions of the EU’s role in peacebuilding: the case of security sector reform in Palestine. Contemp Secur Policy 39(1):119–141
Newman E (2009) Conflict research and the ‘decline’ in civil war. Civil Wars 11(3):255–278
O’Donnell G, Schmitter PC (2013) Transitions from authoritarian rule: tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Paffenholz T (2015) Unpacking the local turn in peacebuilding: a critical assessment towards an agenda for future research. Third World Q 36(5):857–874
Paris R (2004) At war’s end: building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Regan PM, Frank RW, Aydin A (2009) Diplomatic interventions and civil war: a new dataset. J Peace Res 46(1):135–146
Richmond OP, Mitchell A (2012) Hybrid forms of peace: from everyday agency to post-liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Sabrow S (2017) Local perceptions of the legitimacy of peace operations by the UN, regional organizations and individual states: a case study of the Mali conflict. Int Peacekeeping 24(1):159–186
Schia NN, Gjelsvik IM, Karlsrud J (2014) Connections and disconnections: understanding and integrating local perceptions in United Nations peacekeeping. Confl Trends 7(1):28–34
Sieff K (2016) Members of a U.N. Peacekeeping Force in the Central African Republic allegedly turned to sexual predation, betraying their duty to protect. The Washington Post, February 27.
Simangan D (2017) A detour of the local turn: roadblocks in Timor-Leste’s post-conflict peacebuilding. Asian J Peacebuilding 5(2):195–221
Simangan D (2018) Domino effect of negative hybrid peace in Kosovo’s post-conflict peacebuilding. J Interv Statebuilding 12(1):120–141
Simangan D (2019) International peacebuilding and local involvement: a liberal renaissance? Routledge, Oxon and New York
Simangan D (2020) A case for a normative local involvement in post-conflict peacebuilding. Int Peacekeeping 27(1):77–101
Simangan D, Bose S (2021) Oiling the rigs of state-building: a political settlements analysis of petroleum revenue management in Timor-Leste. Asian J Peacebuilding 9(1):67–89
Simić O, O’Brien M (2014) ‘Peacekeeper babies’: an unintended legacy of United Nations peace support operations. Int Peacekeeping 21(3):345–363
SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute) (2018) SIPRI multilateral peace operations database. sipri.org/databases/pko. Accessed Oct 2018
Tadjbakhsh S (2010) Human security and the legitimisation of peacebuilding. In: Richmond OP (ed) Palgrave advances in peacebuilding: critical developments and approaches. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 116–136
Talentino AK (2007) Perceptions of peacebuilding: the dynamic of imposer and imposed upon. Int Stud Perspect 8(2):152–171
UN (1999) On the situation in Kosovo. UN Doc. S/RES/1244, June 10
UN (2001) No exit without strategy: security council decision-making and the closure or transition of United Nations peacekeeping operations. UN Doc. S/2001/394, April 20
UN (2006) Letter dated 29 May 2006 from the president of the international tribunal for the prosecution of persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991, addressed to the president of the Security Council UNSC. UN Doc. S/2006/353, May 31
UN (2015) Challenge of sustaining peace: report of the advisory group of experts on the review of the peacebuilding architecture. UN Doc. A/69/968-S/2015/490, June 30
von Billerbeck SBK (2017) Whose peace? Local ownership and United Nations peacekeeping. Oxford University Press, Oxford
van der Lijn J (2009) If only there were a blueprint! Factors for success and failure of UN peace-building operations. J Int Peacekeeping 13(1):45–71
Wallis J (2013) Victors, villains and victims: capitalizing on memory in Timor-Leste. Ethnopolitics 12(2):133–160
Wallis J, Kent L, Forsyth M, Dinnen S, Bose S (eds) (2018) Hybridity on the ground in peacebuilding and development. ANU Press, Canberra
Werner S, Yuen A (2005) Making and keeping peace. Int Organ 59(2):261–292
Whalan J (2013) How peace operations work: power, legitimacy, and effectiveness. Oxford University Press, Oxford
World Bank (2011) World development report: conflict, security, and development. World Bank, Washington, DC
Zanker F (2018) Legitimacy in peacebuilding: rethinking civil society involvement in peace negotiations. Routledge, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simangan, D. (2022). In the Eye of the Peacebuilder: International and Local Perceptions of Peacebuilding Success and Failure in Kosovo and Timor-Leste. In: Kubota, Y. (eds) Micro-evidence for Peacebuilding Theories and Policies. Evidence-Based Approaches to Peace and Conflict Studies, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4899-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4899-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4762-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4899-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)