Skip to main content

Impact Resistance of Cement Material Partial Replaced by Silica Fume Under the Charpy Test

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Structural Health Monitoring and Engineering Structures

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an experimental work on impact resistance and compressive strength of ordinary Portland cement replaced by different proportions of silica fume. The main objective of this study is to determine the optimum proportion of silica fume to replace cement in order to improve the impact resistance of hardened cement paste. In addition, proposing a relationship between the impact resistance and compressive strength of the blended cementitious materials after 28 days of curing. To fulfill the objective, different proportions of silica fume of 0, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, and 20% are selected to replace ordinary Portland cement partially. The impact resistance of the hardened cement pastes is determined by the Charpy impact test at the ages of 7, 14, and 28 days. Besides, the compressive strength at 28 days of the paste is also observed. The observation from this research indicates that the highest impact resistance of the composite cement paste corresponds with the silica fume proportion of 20%. Besides, a nonlinear equation is found to describe the relationship between the 28 days compressive strength and impact resistance. This paper can be contributed to the literature of understanding the benefits and effects of silica fume, as well as have an overview of its optimum percentage when dealing with the impact resistance of cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green H (1964) Impact strength of concrete. Proc Inst Civ Eng 28(3):383–396

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neville AM (2011) Properties of concrete, 5th edn. Pearson Education Limited, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scrivener KL, Crumbie AK, Laugesen P (2004) The interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between cement paste and aggregate in concrete. Interface Sci 12:411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Naus DJ (1973) Fracture mechanics applicability to Portland cement concretes. Army Construction Engineering Research

    Google Scholar 

  5. Su Z, Bijen JMJM, Larbi JA (1991) Influence of polymer modification on the hydration of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 21(2–3):242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rossignolo JA (2007) Effect of silica fume and SBR latex on the paste aggregate interfacial transition zone. Mater Res 10(1):83–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farooqi MU, Ali M (2019) Effect of pre-treatment and content of wheat straw on energy absorption capability of concrete. Constr Build Mater 224:572–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saxena R, Siddique S, Gupta T, Sharma RK, Chaudhary S (2018) Impact resistance and energy absorption capacity of concrete containing plastic waste. Constr Build Mater 176:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar V, Iqbal MA, Mittal AK (2018) Study of induced prestress on deformation and energy absorption characteristics of concrete slabs under drop impact loading. Constr Build Mater 188:656–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar V, Iqbal MA, Mittal AK (2017) Energy absorption capacity of prestressed and reinforced concrete slabs subjected to multiple impacts. Proc Struct Integrity 6:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maho B, Jamnam S, Sukontasukkul P, Fujikake K, Banthia N (2017) Preliminary study on multilayer bulletproof concrete panel: impact energy absorption and failure pattern of fibre reinforced concrete, para-rubber and Styrofoam sheets. Proc Eng 210:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Z, Zhang B, Yan P (2016) Comparative study of effect of raw and densified silica fume in the paste, mortar and concrete. Constr Build Mater 105:82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao GA (2003) Investigations on the performance of silica fume-incorporated cement pastes and mortars. Cem Concr Res 33(11):1765–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flores YC, Cordeiro GC, Filho RDT, Tavares LM (2017) Performance of Portland cement pastes containing nano-silica and different types of silica. Constr Build Mater 146:524–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Badr A, Ashour AF (2005) Modified ACI drop-weight impact test for concrete. ACI Mater J 102(4):249–255

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mohammadhosseini H, Awal ASMA, Yatim JBM (2017) The impact resistance and mechanical properties of concrete reinforced with waste polypropylene carpet fibres. Constr Build Mater 143:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu R, Beers LV, Spiesz P, Brouwers HJH (2016) Impact resistance of a sustainable ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) under pendulum impact loadings. Constr Build Mater 107:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vallens K, Bescher E, Mackenzie JD, Rice E (2001) A new technique for the measurement of the impact resistance of wall coatings. Cem Concr Res 31(6):965–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Francois D, Pineau A (2002) From Charpy to present impact testing, vol 30, 1st edn. Elsevier Science

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tahmasebinia F (2008) Finite element simulation of reinforced concrete structures under impact accident. Struct Surv 26(5):445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cabrilo A, Geric K (2018) Fracture mechanic and Charpy impact properties of a crack in weld metal, HAZ and base metal of welded armor steel. Proc Struct Integrity 13:2059–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cao R, Chan ZS, Yuan JJ, Han CY, Xiao ZG, Zhang XB, Yan YJ, Chena JH (2018) The effects of Silicon and Copper on microstructures, tensile and Charpy properties of weld metals by refined X120 wire. Mater Sci Eng, A 718:350–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cao Y, Zhen Y, Song M, Yi H, Li F, Li X (2020) Determination of Johnson–Cook parameters and evaluation of Charpy impact test performance for X80 pipeline steel. Int J Mech Sci 179

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lenkey GB, Major Z (2002) Application of electric emission technique for determining the dynamic fracture toughness of polymers. Eur Struct Integrity Soc 30:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Major Z, Lang RW (2002) Determination of rate dependent fracture toughness of plastics using precracked Charpy specimens. Eur Struct Integrity Soc 30:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grellmann W, Lach R, Seidler S (2002) Determination of geometry-independent fracture mechanics values of polymers. Eur Struct Integrity Soc 30:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hakamy A, Shaikh FUA, Low IM (2014) Thermal and mechanical properties of hemp fabric-reinforced nanoclay–cement nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 49:1684–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Z, Cui Q, Li Q (2015) Properties of GRC modified by emulsion. Presented at the GRCA 2015 Congress, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, April 19–21, 2015, International Glassfibre Reinforced Concrete Association, Hampton, UK, 14p, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yu R, Spiesz P, Brouwers HJH (2014) Static properties and impact resistance of a green ultra-high performance hybrid fibre reinforced concrete (UHPHFRC): experiments and modeling. Constr Build Mater 68:158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ISO 179-1:2010 (2010) Plastics—determination of Charpy impact properties. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  31. ASTM D6110-18 (2018) Standard test method for determining the Charpy impact resistance of notched specimens of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  32. ISO 148-1:2016 (2009) Metallic materials—Charpy pendulum impact test. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  33. ASTM E23-18 (2018) Standard test methods for notched bar impact testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  34. ASTM C150/C150M-20 (2020) Standard specification for Portland cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  35. ASTM C305-20 (2020) Standard practice for mechanical mixing of hydraulic cement pastes and mortars of plastic consistency. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yajun J, Cahyadi JH (2003) Effects of densified silica fume on microstructure and compressive strength of blended cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 33(10):1543–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Janca M, Siler P, Opravil T, Kotrla J (2019) Improving the dispersion of silica fume in cement pastes and mortars. In: International conference building materials, products and technologies

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rodríguez ED, Bernal SA, Provis JL, Payá J, Monzó JM, Borrachero MV (2012) Structure of portland cement pastes blended with sonicated silica fume. J Mater Civ Eng 24(10):1295–1304

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fraga YSB, da Silva Rêgo JH, Capuzzo VMS (2020) Ultrasonication effect of silica fume on compressive strength of cement pastes. In: Proceedings of the international conference of sustainable production and use of cement and concrete, pp 149–155

    Google Scholar 

  40. ASTM C109/C109M-20b (2020) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50 mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nguyen TNM, Kim JJ (2021) Energy absorption capacity of SBR latex-modified ordinary portland cement by Charpy impact test. Materials 14:2544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nguyen TNM, Lim NH, Kang YS, Kim JJ (2018) Investigation of impact resistance for latex modified hardened cement pastes. Int J Railway 11(1):10–14

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nguyen TNM, Kim JJ (2018) Impact resistance evaluation of cement pastes including admixtures by Charpy impact tests. J Korean Soc Hazard Mitigation 18(6):229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yajun J, Cahyadi JH (2003) Effects of densified silica fume on microstructure and compressive strength of blended cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 33:1543–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Amudhavalli NK, Mathew J (2012) Effect of silica fume on strength and durability parameters of concrete. Int J Eng Sci Emerg Technol 3(1):28–35

    Google Scholar 

  46. Michal Ž, Tomáš V, Lenka L (2016) Dosage of silica fume in high performance concrete. Key Eng Mater 677:98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Imam A, Kumar V, Srivastava V (2018) Review study towards effect of silica fume on the fresh and hardened properties of concrete. Adv Concr Constr 6(2):145–157

    Google Scholar 

  48. Maagi MT, Jun G (2020) Effect of the particle size of nanosilica on early age compressive strength in oil-well cement paste. Constr Build Mater 259:120393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mosaberpanah MA, Eren O (2016) Relationship between 28-days compressive strength and compression toughness factor of ultra high performance concrete using design of experiments. Procedia Eng 145:1565–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Murali G, Santhi AS, Ganesh GM (2014) Empirical relationship between the impact energy and compressive strength for fiber reinforced concrete. J Scien Ind Res 73:469–473

    Google Scholar 

  51. Marar K, Eren Ö, Çelik T (2001) Relationship between impact energy and compression toughness energy of high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete. Mater Lett 47(4–5):297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by University of Transport and Communications (UTC) under grant number T2021-PHII-003. Authors would like to thank the High-tech construction materials laboratory, Kyungnam University, Korea, for supporting the experimental test.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tri N. M. Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nguyen, TQ., Nguyen, DL., Nguyen, T.N.M., Bui, T.T. (2023). Impact Resistance of Cement Material Partial Replaced by Silica Fume Under the Charpy Test. In: Rao, R.V., Khatir, S., Cuong-Le, T. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Health Monitoring and Engineering Structures. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4835-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4835-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4834-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4835-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics