Skip to main content

Comparative Study on Inducing Effect of Two Kinds of Shape Flash in Pilot Selection by EEG Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering (MMESE 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 941))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 749 Accesses

Abstract

Objective To compare the differences of two types of EEG flash evoked effect in pilot selection, and to provide evidence for optimizing the effect of EEG pilot selection. Methods A total of 500 high school students aged 17 to 20 were selected to participate in the Air Force pilot selection in 2020 to 2021. Two kinds of flash (arc and round plate) were used for flash evoked selection respectively. There were 250 people in the arc shaped lamp group and 250 people in the round plate shaped lamp group, and the selection effect and difference of the two kinds of different shaped flash lamp were compared. Results In the arc-shaped group, 238 patients (95.2%) had normal EEG photic driving response. There were 12 patients (4.8%) with abnormal EEG, including 6 patients (2.4%) with abnormal photic driving, 2 patients (0.8%) with multiple reaction, 3 patients (1.2%) with fractional reaction, and 1 patient (0.4%) with abnormal EEG wave. There were 237 (94.8%) normal EEG photic driving in the round plate lamp group. There were 13 patients (5.2%) with abnormal EEG, including 5 patients (0.2%) with abnormal photic driving, 3 patients (1.2%) with multiple reaction, 3 patients (1.2%) with fractional reaction, and 2 patients (0.8%) with abnormal EEG wave. There was no significant difference between the eliminate rates (X2 = 0.890, P = 1.000). The elimination rate of arc shaped lamp group was 4.8%, and that of round plate shaped lamp group was 5.2%, there was no significant difference between them (X2 = 0.042, P = 0.837). Conclusion The evoked effect of two kinds of shaped flash is basically the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen, Y., Zhu, L., Liu, X., et al.: Study on electroencephalogram flash induction technique and identification index in medical examination. Chin. J. Aerosp. Med. 28(2), 97–101 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, Y., Jia, H.: Development of portable electroencephalogram testing kit. Med. Equip. 36(12), 43–48 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenow, F., Klein, K.M., Hamer, H.M.: Non-invasive EEG evaluation in epilepsy diagnosis. Expert Rev. Neurother. 15(4), 425–444 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao, X., Guo, D., Feng, Y.: Study on the improvement of EEG positive rate by rhythmic flash stimulation-analysis of 109 cases of clinical EEG flash stimulation. J. Brain Neurol. Dis. 2(1), 23–24 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ebersole, J.S., Pedley, T.A.: Modern Clinical Electroencephalography. Expert Group of Chinese Anti-Epilepsy Association, trans., pp. 120–240. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koutroumanidis, M., Tsirka, V., Panayiotopoulos, C.: Adult-onset photosentivity: clinical significance and epiliepsy syndromes including idiopathic (possibly genetic) photosensitive occipital epilepsy. Epilepsy Dis. 17(3), 275–286 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité, D., Rubboli, G., Hirsch, E., et al.: Methodology of photic stimulation revisited: updated European algorithm for visual stimulation in the EEG laboratory. Epilepsia 53(1), 16–24 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, X., Sha, F., Jiang, W.: Photosensitivity and EEG analysis of intermittent flash stimulation in children with epilepsy. J. Clin. Neurol. 32(1), 29–32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Su, Q., Gan, W.: Clinical analysis of video electroencephalogram in children with intermittent flash stimulation positive epilepsy. Med. Rev. 26(17), 3532–3536 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongsheng Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the Logistics Department for Civilian Ethics Committee of Air Force Medical Center, PLA.

All subjects who participated in the experiment were provided with and signed an informed consent form.

All relevant ethical safeguards have been met with regard to subject protection.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, Y., Tian, D. (2023). Comparative Study on Inducing Effect of Two Kinds of Shape Flash in Pilot Selection by EEG Detection. In: Long, S., Dhillon, B.S. (eds) Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering. MMESE 2022. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 941. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4786-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4786-5_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4785-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4786-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics