Abstract
Objective To compare the differences of two types of EEG flash evoked effect in pilot selection, and to provide evidence for optimizing the effect of EEG pilot selection. Methods A total of 500 high school students aged 17 to 20 were selected to participate in the Air Force pilot selection in 2020 to 2021. Two kinds of flash (arc and round plate) were used for flash evoked selection respectively. There were 250 people in the arc shaped lamp group and 250 people in the round plate shaped lamp group, and the selection effect and difference of the two kinds of different shaped flash lamp were compared. Results In the arc-shaped group, 238 patients (95.2%) had normal EEG photic driving response. There were 12 patients (4.8%) with abnormal EEG, including 6 patients (2.4%) with abnormal photic driving, 2 patients (0.8%) with multiple reaction, 3 patients (1.2%) with fractional reaction, and 1 patient (0.4%) with abnormal EEG wave. There were 237 (94.8%) normal EEG photic driving in the round plate lamp group. There were 13 patients (5.2%) with abnormal EEG, including 5 patients (0.2%) with abnormal photic driving, 3 patients (1.2%) with multiple reaction, 3 patients (1.2%) with fractional reaction, and 2 patients (0.8%) with abnormal EEG wave. There was no significant difference between the eliminate rates (X2 = 0.890, P = 1.000). The elimination rate of arc shaped lamp group was 4.8%, and that of round plate shaped lamp group was 5.2%, there was no significant difference between them (X2 = 0.042, P = 0.837). Conclusion The evoked effect of two kinds of shaped flash is basically the same.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen, Y., Zhu, L., Liu, X., et al.: Study on electroencephalogram flash induction technique and identification index in medical examination. Chin. J. Aerosp. Med. 28(2), 97–101 (2017)
Chen, Y., Jia, H.: Development of portable electroencephalogram testing kit. Med. Equip. 36(12), 43–48 (2015)
Rosenow, F., Klein, K.M., Hamer, H.M.: Non-invasive EEG evaluation in epilepsy diagnosis. Expert Rev. Neurother. 15(4), 425–444 (2015)
Gao, X., Guo, D., Feng, Y.: Study on the improvement of EEG positive rate by rhythmic flash stimulation-analysis of 109 cases of clinical EEG flash stimulation. J. Brain Neurol. Dis. 2(1), 23–24 (1994)
Ebersole, J.S., Pedley, T.A.: Modern Clinical Electroencephalography. Expert Group of Chinese Anti-Epilepsy Association, trans., pp. 120–240. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing (2009)
Koutroumanidis, M., Tsirka, V., Panayiotopoulos, C.: Adult-onset photosentivity: clinical significance and epiliepsy syndromes including idiopathic (possibly genetic) photosensitive occipital epilepsy. Epilepsy Dis. 17(3), 275–286 (2015)
Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité, D., Rubboli, G., Hirsch, E., et al.: Methodology of photic stimulation revisited: updated European algorithm for visual stimulation in the EEG laboratory. Epilepsia 53(1), 16–24 (2021)
Chen, X., Sha, F., Jiang, W.: Photosensitivity and EEG analysis of intermittent flash stimulation in children with epilepsy. J. Clin. Neurol. 32(1), 29–32 (2019)
Su, Q., Gan, W.: Clinical analysis of video electroencephalogram in children with intermittent flash stimulation positive epilepsy. Med. Rev. 26(17), 3532–3536 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The study was approved by the Logistics Department for Civilian Ethics Committee of Air Force Medical Center, PLA.
All subjects who participated in the experiment were provided with and signed an informed consent form.
All relevant ethical safeguards have been met with regard to subject protection.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, Y., Tian, D. (2023). Comparative Study on Inducing Effect of Two Kinds of Shape Flash in Pilot Selection by EEG Detection. In: Long, S., Dhillon, B.S. (eds) Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering. MMESE 2022. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 941. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4786-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4786-5_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4785-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4786-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)