Skip to main content

System Driven Design Industry: The Challenge Towards a Collective Vision for All Stakeholders in Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
[ ] With Design: Reinventing Design Modes (IASDR 2021)

Abstract

The world is changing, so are the demands on the Design industry, from businesses, and society as a whole. Design fundamentally is about change as it responds to the external environment to identify opportunities to create new design activities and outcomes. Consequently, design (in theory and practice) tends to elevate its role as a catalyst for change, influencing strategic decisions, producing clear visions, shared beliefs, and values, and the models, methods, and tools to innovate with an emphasis on a systemic, whole-system interpretation of sustainable development. Why is it that Design professionals and Design academics don't exchange their knowledge for the common good? In this paper, therefore, a central objective is to build an argument for why the value of Design in business, and its economics thinking and approach in management, need a common purpose system view to tackle this century's technological, ethical, social, and ecological challenges. In the end, Design is seen as complex, while designers advocate for specific capabilities to innovate by making things simple and better. To achieve a common ground, we refer to Donella Meadows’ definition of a system and to the literature on the Design industry. We use her model to draw a simple form that brings together all parts of design activity, practice, or theory in order to develop a collective vision and help the understanding of the Design industry's purpose, ethics, and responsibility for a life-centred future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 469.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Porter, M., Kramer, M.: Creating shared value: redefining capitalism and the role of the corporation in society. Harv. Bus. Rev. 89(1/2), 62–77 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, C.A.: Reflections on diversity in design research. J. Eng. Des. 23(8), 563–576 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raworth, K.: A safe and just space for humanity: can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulu, B., Djamasbi, S., Leroy, G. (eds.): Extending the Boundaries of Design Science Theory and Practice: 14th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, DESRIST 2019, Worcester, MA, USA, 4–6 June 2019, Proceedings, vol. 11491. Springer (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5

  • Cash, P., Stankovic, T., Štorga, M.: Experimental design research. Approaches, Perspectives, Applications. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33781-4

  • Sardar, Z.: Welcome to postnormal times. Futures 42(5), 435–444 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R.: Worlds in the making: design, management, and the reform of organizational culture. She Ji: J. Des. Econ. Innov. 1(1), 5–21 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Design Centre: The Design Ladder. Copenhagen, Danish Design Centre,Denmark (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins-Desbiolles, F.: Socialising tourism for social and ecological justice after COVID-19. Tour. Geograph. 22(3), 610–623 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, J.: The divisiveness of design thinking. Interact 25(3), 28–34 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck, R., Battistella, C., Huizingh, E.: Corporate foresight: an emerging field with a rich tradition. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 101, 1–9 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C.: Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Bus. Rev. 69(3) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackara, J.: In the Bubble: Designing in a Complex World. MIT Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A.V., Duflo, E.: Good economics for hard times: Better answers to our biggest problems. Penguin UK (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E.M., Cooper, R., Slater, S.F.: Strategic design. Bus. Horiz. 41(2), 55–61 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R., Baiyere, A., Gregor, S., Hevner, A., Rossi, M.: Design science research contributions: finding a balance between artifact and theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19(5), 3 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., Ozcan, K.: Strategy and co-creation thinking. Strat. Leadersh. 41(6), 5 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-07-2013-0053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, J.: Creating economic value by design. Int. J. Des. 3(1), 71–84 (2009). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474221290.0043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddoe, R., et al.: Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(8), 2483–2489 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, R., Lam, B.: Managing strategic design: Macmillan International Higher Education (2014a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkman, I.: Product design briefs as knowledge-based artifacts of cross-functional collaboration in new product development. Des. Disc. Bus. Ind. Re: Res. 6, 33–50 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (Chapter 5, “The Sciences of Design: Creating the Artificial.”) (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, T.: Redesigning a design program: how Carnegie Mellon University is developing design curricula for the 21st century. Solutions 6(1), 91–100 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J.: Learning to use design thinking tools for successful innovation. Strat. Leader. 39(5), 13–19 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571111161480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mozota, B.B.: Structuring strategic design management: Michael Porter's value chain. Des. Manage. J. (Former Ser.) 9(2), 26–31 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Valtonen, A.: Approaching change with and in design. She Ji: J. Des. Econom. Innov. 6(4), 505–529 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mozota, B.B.: Strategic view of design in business. It will be found, in fact, that the ingenious are always fanciful, and the truly imaginative never otherwise than analytic. Int. Des. Bus. Manag. 1, 41 (2011). Aalto University

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mozota, B.B., Valade-Amland, S.: Design: A Business Case: Thinking, Leading, and Managing by Design. Business Expert Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegall, N.: Designing for sustainability: a philosophy for ecologically intentional design. Des. Issues 22(2), 56–63 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroni, A.: Strategic design: where are we now? Reflection around the foundations of a recent discipline. Strat. Des. Res. J. 1(1), 31–38 (2008). https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.20081.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mozota, B.B., Wolff, F.: Forty years of research in design management: a review of literature and directions for the future. Strat. Des. Res. J. 12(01) (2019). https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2019.121.02

  • Meyer, M.W., Norman, D.: Changing design education for the 21st century. She Ji: J. Des. Econom. Innov. 6(1), 13–49 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson‐Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., Çetinkaya M.: Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Create. Innov. Manage. 22(2), 121–146 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R.: Systems thinking and design thinking: the search for principles in the world we are making. She Ji: J. Des. Econom. Innov. 5(2), 85–104 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers (UK edition published 1952, ed. Dorwin Cartwright). Harper & Bros. (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, K.: Problem and Paradox in Foundations of Design (2019). http://home.snafu.de/jonasw/PARADOXFriedmanE.html

  • Nelson, H.G., Stolterman, E.: The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. MIT Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8(2), 5–21 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanrikulu, O.G.: Advancing rationality with sustainability: an analysis of agent-based simulation. Hatfield Grad. J. Public Aff. 2(1), 3 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehring, J., Bishop, P.C.: Foresight and design: new support for strategic decision making. She Ji: J. Des. Econom. Innov. 6(3), 408–432 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, E.: Design, ethics and sustainability. Guidelines for a Transition Phase. The University of Art and Design Helsinki (June), pp. 9–15 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham, C.T.A., Magistretti, S., Dell’Era, C.: The role of design thinking in big data innovations. Innovation 24(2), 290–314 (2022) 

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehring, J., Liedtka, J.: Embracing systematic futures thinking at the intersection of strategic planning, foresight and design. J. Innov. Manage. 6, 134–152 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D., Matthews, G.: Risk factors of malaria in children under the age of five years old in Uganda. Malar. J. 15(1), 1–11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, J., Dilnot, C.: A John Heskett Reader: design, history, economics, vol. 30. Bloomsbury Academic, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R.W.: Sustainable tourism: a state-of-the-art review. Tour. Geograph. 1(1), 7–25 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616689908721291

  • Sanders, L.: An evolving map of design practise and design research. Interactions 15(6), 13–17 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1409040.1409043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli, P., Perks, H., Beverland, M.B.: Elevating design in the organisation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 35(4), 629–651 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., Wyatt, J.: Design thinking for social innovation. Dev. Outreach 12(1), 29–43 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talke, K., Salomo, S., Wieringa, J.E., Lutz, A.: What about design newness? Investigating the relevance of a neglected dimension of product innovativeness. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 26(6), 601–615 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagnin, C.: Developing a transformative business strategy through the combination of design thinking and futures literacy. Technol. Anal. Strat. Manage. 30(5), 524–539 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1340638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, B.M., Tharp, S.M.: Discursive Design: Critical, Speculative, and Alternative Things. MIT Press (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, Y.: The role of designers in integrating societal value in the product and service development processes. Int. J. Des. 10(2), 49–65 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanek, V.: What to design and why. Selskabet for Industriel Formgivning. Mobilia 193, 2–13 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardar, Z.: The smog of ignorance: knowledge and wisdom in postnormal times. Futures 120, 102554 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantó, M., Frasquet, M., Irene, G.S.: Design orientation in new product development and its measurement. Eur. J. Innov. Manage. 24(1), 131–149 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2019-0187

  • Raworth, K.: Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Chelsea Green Publishing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, P.J.: Developing theory-driven design research. Des. Stud. 56, 84–119 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, D.W., Moreau, P.: The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J. Mark. Res. 39(1), 47–60 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, H.M.: Design Works: How to Tackle Your Toughest Innovation Challenges Through Business Design. University of Toronto Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D.H.: Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, K.: Models of design: envisioning a future design education. Vis. Lang. 46(1/2), 132 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvani, A., Lew, A.A., Perez, M.S.: COVID-19 is expanding global consciousness and the sustainability of travel and tourism. Tour. Geogr. 22(3), 567–576 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, T.: Philosophy of design: a meta-theoretical structure for design theory. Des. Stud. 21(3), 293–313 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, D., Yaffe-Bellany, D.: Shareholder value is no longer everything, top CEOs say. The New York Times (2019). Accessed 1 Oct 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/19/business/business-roundtable-ceos-corporations.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joern Buehring .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Buehring, J., de Mozota, B. (2022). System Driven Design Industry: The Challenge Towards a Collective Vision for All Stakeholders in Design. In: Bruyns, G., Wei, H. (eds) [ ] With Design: Reinventing Design Modes. IASDR 2021. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics