Skip to main content

Exemplifying the Opportunities and Limitations of Blockchain Technology Through Corporate Tax Losses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Big Data and Analytics in Accounting and Auditing

Abstract

There is an increasing need to recognize the opportunity of blockchain technology beyond cryptocurrencies, such as bitcoin, and instead consider its potential as a technology forming part of the tax regulatory framework. We consider the potential for blockchain technology to play a digital infrastructure role for corporate tax loss compliance in Australia: a “RegTech” solution. In doing so, we identify the key features of blockchain and key use cases across numerous business sectors, then examine the role and function of blockchain in the context of corporate tax losses, where complex carry forward rules (e.g. continuity of ownership, business continuity tests) apply to avoid the erosion of government revenues. We find that in theory, blockchain could enable key efficiencies in tax compliance of corporate tax losses; however, the complexity and discretion within tax law creates real barriers for an effective blockchain solution. We conclude that blockchain offers an ability to track and flag resource allocation to broad, high level elements of the corporate tax compliance. It therefore offers potential for the greater digital ecosystem; however, it does not offer a solution in isolation. As the world progresses towards increased digitalization, this use case highlights the need for continual reflection of complex regulations and high levels of discretion, whilst balancing taxpayer rights, equity and fairness. Through digitalization, we may see increasing simplification for innovations to thrive and digitalization to meet the needs of a digitalized economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Justified trust stems from the OECD and adopted by the ATO. According to the ATO “Justified trust builds and maintains community confidence that taxpayers are paying the right amount of tax. It also allows us to focus our resources in the right areas” (ATO, 2019).

  2. 2.

    The robo-debt scheme used information collected across government agencies (e.g. ATO) to attempt to determine overpayments, with the system automatically sending letters and raising debts to past and present social security recipients. The Australian Government ultimately conceded that the method of income averaging to raise debts was unlawful: Victoria Legal Aid (2020).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Morton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morton, E., Curran, M. (2023). Exemplifying the Opportunities and Limitations of Blockchain Technology Through Corporate Tax Losses. In: Rana, T., Svanberg, J., Öhman, P., Lowe, A. (eds) Handbook of Big Data and Analytics in Accounting and Auditing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4460-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics