Abstract
Post-Soviet Central Asia is clearly distinct from the broader geographic space known as Central Eurasia. This distinction provides geographic and political boundaries of the research subject of the book. Interdependence, security and identity define Central Asia’s position as a region. At the same time, a number of constraints impede the continuous development of regional cooperation. The adjacent major powers play the key role in contributing both toward the drivers and toward the constraints to regional cooperation. Traditional approaches to studying regionalism do not explain interstate dynamics in Central Asia, but certain concepts of contemporary frameworks for studying regions are useful for analyzing multilateral cooperation in Central Asia. While higher dimensions of regional integration are not developed in Central Asia, the initial foundation of the coherent region, such as geographic proximity and transnational exchanges, are clearly visible. These dimensions are heavily dependent on existing and emerging transnational infrastructure. Furthermore, infrastructural projects of regional significance are reliant on the activities of the adjacent powers, Russia and China. Subsequently, the chapter demonstrates that understanding the nature of these projects sheds the light on the nature of the major powers’ engagement in Central Asia and the effects of this engagement on regional cooperation. The final section of the chapter provides a discussion of the key principles of the social constructivism approach, utilized in the analyses of interactions between major powers and the Central Asian states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Acharya, Amitav, “Comparative Regionalgism: A Field Whose Time Has Come?” The International Spectator, 47, 1, March 2012, 3–15.
Allison, Roy, “Regionalism, Regional Structures and Security Management in Central Asia,” International Affairs, 80, 3, 2004, 463–483.
Aris, Stephen, “A New Model of Asian Regionalism: Does the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Have More Potential Than ASEAN?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22, 3, 2009, 451–457.
Bohr, Annette, “Regionalism in Central Asia: New Geopolitics, Old Regional Order,” 80, 3, May 2004, 485–502.
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wever, Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Cooley, Alexander, Great Games, Local Rules. The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia, New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
De Lombaerde, Philippe, Fredrik Soderbaum, Luk Van Langenhove and Francis Baert, “The Problem of Comparison in Comparative Regionalism,” Review of International Studies, 36, 2010.
Fawcett, Louise, “Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History of Regionalism,” International Affairs, 8, 3, 2004, 429–446.
Gleason, Abbot, “Eurasia: What Is It? Is It?” Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1, 2010, 26–32.
Godehardt, Nadine, The Chinese Constitution of Central Asia. Regions and Interwined Actors in International Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 19–20.
Golden, Peter, Central Asia in World History, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Haas, Ernst B., “International Integration: The European and the Universal Process”, International Organization, 51, 3, Summer 1961, 366–392.
Hettne, Bjorn, Frederick Soderbaum, “Theorizing the Rise of Regionness,” New Political Economy, 5, 3, 2000, 457–474.
Johnson, Corey, “Geographies of Obdurate Infrastructure in Eurasia. The Case of Natural Gas” in Walcott, Susan M. and Corey Johnson (eds.), Eurasian Corridors on Interconnection: From South China to the Caspian Sea, Routledge, 2014.
Karrar, Hasan H., The New Silk Road Diplomacy. China’s Central Asian Foreign Policy Since The Cold War, Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009, 25–27.
Kavalski, Emilian, “India and Central Asia: The No Influence of the “Look North” Policy”, in Emilian Kavalsky (ed.), The New Central Asia. The Regional Impact of International Actors, Singapore: World Scientific, 2010, 239–260.
Kavalski, Emilian, “Shanghaied into Cooperation: Framing China’s Socialization of Central Asia,” Journal of Asian and African Studies, 45, 2, 2010, 131–145.
Kavalski, Emilian, “Whom to Follow? Central Asia Between the EU and China,” China Report, 43, 1, 2007, 43–55.
Kavalski, Emilian, Central Asia and the Rise of Normative Powers. Contextualizing the Security Governance of the European Union, China and India. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.
Kavalsky, Emilian, “Uncovering the “New” Central Asia. The Dynamics of External Agency in a Turbulent Region”, in Emilian Kavalsky (ed.), The New Central Asia. The Regional Impact of International Actors, Singapore: World, 2010.
Krausse, Alexis, Russia in Asia. A Record and a Study, 1558–1899, Leiden: Global Oriental, 2012.
Lewington, Richard, “The Challenge of Managing Central Asia’s New Borders,” Asian Affairs, 41, 2, 2010, 221–236.
Moravcsik, Andrew, “Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 33, 4, 1995, 611–622.
Moravczik, Andrew, “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach”, Jourmal of Common Market Studies, 31, 4, 1993, 473–524.
Ndayi, Zoleka V., “‘Theorizing the Rise of Regionness’ by Bjorn Hettne and Frederic Soderbaum. Review Article”, Politikon, 33, 1, April 2006.
Rosamond, Ben, “The Uniting of Europe and the Foundation of the EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Earnst B. Haas”, Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 2, April 2005, 237–254.
Starr, Frederick S., “In Defense of Greater Central Asia,” Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, September 2008.
Wendt, Alexander, “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, 46, 2, Spring 1992, 391–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krasnopolsky, P. (2022). Central Asia as a Region. In: China, Russia and Central Asian Infrastructure. Palgrave Series in Asia and Pacific Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4254-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4254-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4253-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4254-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)